Advertisement

Technique of Increasing Passenger Comfort by Ensuring Rational Parameters of Flexural Stiffness of Bodies of Passenger Cars

  • D. Ya. Antipin
  • E. V. Lukashova
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering book series (LNME)

Abstract

Based on the analysis of simulation results and full-scale running tests conducted by domestic and foreign specialists, the natural frequencies and vibration modes of the body bearing structure, which have the greatest impact on the passenger comfort level and safety, are determined. Design measures are proposed to ensure an increase in safety and comfort of transportation in domestic passenger cars through the installation of an additional load-bearing partition in the middle section of the body, which also ensures the requirements for the passive safety of a car as well as the introduction of additional longitudinal elements in the frame supporting structure.

Keywords

Locomotive Wheel–rail Clutch force Coefficient of adhesion Magnetic field Coupling amplifier Paramagnetic isolation 

References

  1. 1.
    BS 6841 (1987) Guide to measurement and evaluation of human exposure to whole-body mechanical vibration and repeated shock. BSI, p 24Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    BS EN 12299:2009 (2009) Railway applications. Ride comfort for passengers. Measurement and evaluation. BSI, p 66Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Suzuki H (1998) Research trends on riding comfort evaluation in Japan. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part F J Rail Rapid Transit 212(1):61–72MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Salvendy G (2012) Handbook of human factors and ergonomics, 4th edn. Wiley, p 1752Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    GM/RT2100 (2010) Requirements for rail vehicle structures. Railway Group Standard Issue 5, p 77Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Carlbom P (2000) Carbody and passengers in rail vehicle dynamics. Doctoral thesis, StockholmGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Orvnäs A (2010) Methods for reducing vertical carbody vibrations of a rail vehicle. Report in Railway Technology, Stockholm, p 35Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wu P, Zeng J, Dai H (2004) Dynamic response analysis of railway passenger car with flexible carbody model based on semi-active suspensions. Veh Syst Dyn 41:774–783CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Zhou J et al (2009) Influences of car body vertical flexibility on ride quality of passenger railway vehicles. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part F J Rail Rapid Transit 223(5):461–471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wu PB, Xue SH, Yang CH (2005) Dynamic response of high speed passenger car based on flexible car body model. J Traffic Transp Eng 5:5–8Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    ISO 2631-4 (2004) Mechanical vibrations and shock—evaluation of human exposure to whole body vibrations—part 4: guidelines for the evaluation of the effects of vibration and rotational motion on passenger and crew comfort of fixed guide way transport systems. International Organization for Standardization, p 9Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    UIC 513R (1994) Guidelines for evaluating passenger comfort in relation to vibration in railway vehicle. International Union of Railways, p 81Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lauriks G, Evans J, Förstberg J, Balli M, Barron de Angoit I (2003) UIC comfort tests Investigation of ride comfort and comfort disturbance on transition and circular curves, p 116Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Strandemar K (2005) On objective measures for ride comfort evaluation. Royal Inst Tech, p 91Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Tomioka T, Takigami T, Suzuki Y (2006) Numerical analysis of three-dimensional flexural vibration of railway vehicle car body. Veh Syst Dyn 44:272–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hui C, Weihua Z, Bingrong M (2015) Vertical vibration analysis of the flexible carbody of high speed train. Int J Veh Struct Syst 7(2):55–60Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Shi H, Wu P (2016) Flexible vibration analysis for car body of high-speed EMU. J Mech Sci Technol 30(1):55–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Young TH, Li CY (2003) Vertical vibration analysis of vehicle/imperfect track systems. Veh Syst Dyn 40(5):329–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Griffin MJ (1996) Handbook of human vibration. Academic Press, p 988Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kozek M, Benatzky C, Schirrer A et al (2008) Vibration damping of a flexible car body structure using piezo-stack actuators. In: Proceedings of the 17th world congress the international federation of automatic control, pp 8284–8292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ashurkova SN, Kobishchanov VV, Kolchina EV (2017) Methods used to analyze the impact of passenger cars bodies design features on their stiffness and strength characteristics. Proc Eng 206:1623–1628CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Technical Report for Interior Passive Safety in Railway Vehicles (2014). UNIFE, p 75Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    BS EN 12663-1:2010+A1:2014 (2010) Railway applications. Structural requirements of railway vehicle bodies. Locomotives and passenger rolling stock (and alternative method for freight wagons). BSI, p 44Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    BS EN 15227:2008+A1:2010 (2008) Railway applications. Crashworthiness requirements for railway vehicle bodies. BSI, p 42Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Bryansk State Technical UniversityBryanskRussia

Personalised recommendations