Advertisement

System Approach Realization Under Compressed Air Quality Increase Strategy Choice Based on Resource Saving

  • T. Ripol-Saragosi
  • L. Ripol-Saragosi
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering book series (LNME)

Abstract

At present, the problem of the compressed preparation (drying and purifying) at the railway rolling stock and enterprises has no single unique solution. The authors try to analyze and systemize the mechanical method for compressed air preparation at the mains of charging and testing breaks device at car depots. It is suggested to use SWOT analysis as the key to analyze strong and weak sides of the method and consider the possible opportunities and threats of its implementation. As an example, the pneumatic system of the “Bataysk-Sever” car exploitation depot is considered for the implementation of energy-saving-compressed air purification systems. The jalousie separator placed in tanks is suggested as an energy-saving technology to be applied for the compressed air purification at pneumatic systems.

Keywords

Compressed air Purification Drying Compressor Rolling stock Depot Dew point 

References

  1. 1.
    Yan F, Rinoshika A (2016) An experimental study on a horizontal energy-saving pneumatic conveying system. In: Proceedings of the 7th world congress on particle technology (WCPT7). Jiangsu University of Science and Technology, School of Mechanical Engineering, Department of Mechanical Systems Engineering, pp 75–86Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    White DH Jr (2008) Compressed air and gas purification and fractionation for high purity applications by improved PSA processes. Sep Sci Technol 43(9–100):2298–2306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Buekens A, Zyaykina NN (2009) Adsorbents and adsorption processes for pollution control. Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems, vol 2Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fisk WJ (2000) Health and productivity gains from better indoor environments and their relationship with building energy efficiency. Annu Rev Energy Env 25:537–566CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Devinny JS, Deshusses M, Webster TS (1999) Biofiltration for air pollution control. FL, Lewis Publishers USA, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Consumers Union of U.S., Inc. 2007. Air purifiers: filtering the claims. Consumer Reports, December, pp 48–51Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    GOST R 53977-2010 Szhatyi vozdukh pnevmoticheskikh system zheleznodorozhnogo podvizhnogo sostava. Trebovaniya k kachestvu (Compressed air of railway rolling stock pneumatic systems. Requirements for quality), 7 pGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Meunier F, Sun LM (2003) Adsorption—aspects théoriques. Techniques de l’Ingénieur, traité génie des procédés, J2730Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Pujol A, Pommier S, Debenest G, Quintard M, Chenu D (2010) Drying in porous media: equilibrium and non-equilibrium approaches for composting processes. In: Proceedings of the COMSOL conference in ParisGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Albert H (2005) SWOT analysis for management consulting (PDF). SRI Alumni Newsletter. SRI International, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mesly O (2017) Project feasibility—tools for uncovering points of vulnerability. Taylor and Francis, CRC Press, New York, 546 pGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Armstrong MA (2006) handbook of human resource management practice, 10th edn. Kogan Page, LondonGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Albert Humphrey The “Father of TAM”. TAM UK. Retrieved 2012-06-03Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Blake M, Wijetilaka S (2015) 5 tips to grow your start-up using SWOT analysis. SydneyGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Geiss O, Giannopoulos G, Tirendi S, Barrero-Moreno J, Larsern BR, Kotzias D (2011) The AIRMEX study—VOC measurements in eleven European cities: statistical analysis of the data. Atmos Environ 45:3676–3684CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lawrence SJ (2006) Description, properties, and degradation of selected volatile organic compounds detected in ground water—a review of selected literature: Atlanta, Georgia, U.S. Geological Survey. Open-File Report 2006-1338, 62 p. http://pubs.usgs.gov/ofr/2006/1338/. Accessed 15 April 2015
  17. 17.
    Ferrero D, Gamba M, Lanzini A, Santarelli M et al (2016) Energy procedia power-to-gas hydrogen: techno-economic assessment of processes towards a multi-purpose energy carrier. In: Proceedings of 71st conference of the Italian Thermal Machines Engineering Association. Turin: ATI2016, pp 50–57, 14–16 September 2016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Goodarzia G, Dehghani S, Akbarzadeh A, Date A (2016) Energy saving opportunities in air drying process in high-pressure compressors. In: Proceedings of 1st international conference on energy and power, ICEP2016. RMIT University, Melbourne, pp. 428–433, 14–16 December 2016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Jones AP (1999) Air quality and health. Atmos Environ 33:4535–4564Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Estrada JM, Kraakman NJR, Muñoz R, Lebrero R (2011) A comparative analysis of odour treatment technologies in wastewater treatment plants. Environ Sci Technol 45(3):1100–1106CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Rostov State Transport UniversityRostov-on-DonRussia

Personalised recommendations