Advertisement

Theoretical Foundations of Vibration Processing Modeling

  • E. Levchenko
  • Yu. Deykun
  • Yu. Moroz
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering book series (LNME)

Abstract

The results of the mathematical model development describing the motion of a load mass in a U-shaped container of a vibrating machine are presented, allowing one to take into account the influence of the field inhomogeneity of the oscillation trajectories of the container walls on the process productivity. The dependence of the determination of the circulating velocity of the working medium and the power expended on the processing of the product depending on the operation modes and the structural arrangement of the vibrating machine units is obtained, which determines the conditions for ensuring the stability of this movement, taking into account the mutual arrangement of the main units of the vibrating machine—vibration exciter and container. The possibility of increasing the operational properties of products as a result of vibrating treatment on finishing-peeling and strengthening operations on machines with a U-shaped container without a rigid kinematic connection between the elements of the technological system with increasing process productivity due to an external field-induced vibration excitement, which is a superposition of two planes-parallel fields: solenoidal-potential and vortex are theoretically proved.

Keywords

Vibration processing Abrasive granules Vortex field Vibration exciter Vibrating machine 

References

  1. 1.
    Brandt W (2005) New developments raise vibrator efficiency. Abras Eng, Munich, pp 32–35Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Malkin S, Guo Ch (2008) Grinding technology: theory and applications of machining with abrasives. Industrial Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hingnett J (2006) The technology of mass finishing. Autom Mach 41(5)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Marinescu I (2004), Tribology of abrasive machining processes. Published in the USA by Brent Beckley, William Andrew, Inc. Cover ArtGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kittreng J (1983) Attacking the astronomical odds in mass finishing. SME Tech Pop, USA, pp 2–18Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hurber E (1970) Maschine zum Entgraten, Polieren, Mischen und Mahlen. US Patent 492518, 14 Aug 1970Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Matsunaga M (1995) Vibratory finishing fundamental research. Boston, pp 27–33Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Harvey G, Fossel V, Lion R (1966) Method for finishing of parts. US Patent 274635, 03 May 1966Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Perez J (1995) Mécanique: points matériels—solides—fluides, MassonGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Aurich C, Biermann D, Blum H (2009) Modeling and simulation of process: machine interaction in grinding. Prod Eng Res Devel 1:111–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    El-Hofy HA-G (2006) Fundamentals of machining processes: conventional and nonconventional processes. CRC Press, PublisherGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rowe Brian W, Chen Xun (1999) Modeling surface roughness improvement in grinding. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part B J Eng Manuf 213(1):93–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    DeVries Warren R (1992) Analysis of material removal processes. Springer, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Aurich C, Biermann D, Blum H, Brecher C (2009) Modeling and simulation of process: machine interaction in grinding. Prod Eng Res Devel 3:111–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    El-Hofy HAG (2006) Fundamentals of machining processes: conventional and nonconventional processes. CRC PressGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Davim Paulo J (2011) Modern machining technology: a practical guide. Woodhead Publishing, UKCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Jackson Mark J, Paulo Davim J (2011) Machining with abrasives. Springer, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Marinescu ID et al (2004) Tribology of abrasive machining processes. Brent Beckley, William Andrew, Inc. Cover ArtGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hou ZB, Komanduri R (2003) On the mechanics of the grinding process—Part I, Stochastic nature of the grinding process. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 43:1579–1593CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Korchak SN (1974) Productivity of the grinding of steel parts. Mashinostroenie Publ., Moscow, 280 p (in Russian)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Polytechnic Institute, Sevastopol State UniversitySevastopolRussia

Personalised recommendations