Advertisement

Shafts Reliability Assessment in Accordance with Criteria of Fatigue Strength Under Random Load Conditions

  • K. Syzrantseva
  • L. Chernaya
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering book series (LNME)

Abstract

The paper considers an improved method of shaft strength reliability calculation based on random values and nonparametric statistics computer simulation methods. The probability of shaft failure-free operation under random load condition is estimated by the fatigue strength resistance criterion. In this case, the safety factor is defined by a sample obtained using nonparametric generators. The paper considers four standard load conditions described by normal, equally, gamma-, and beta-distribution, and also random distribution defined by the user. A probability density function of the safety factor is recovered by the Parzen–Rosenblatt method. All algorithms are realized in Mathcad processor software. The authors carried out computer simulation which showed the difference in the shaft failure probability at different load condition varying from 0.702 to 13.936%. The proposed method allows one not only taking into account actual laws of external load distribution, but also recovering a factual function of safety factor density distribution as well as a failure-free operation probability in accordance with it.

Keywords

Shafts Fatigue strength Random load condition Probability of failure-free operation Nonparametric statistics methods 

References

  1. 1.
    Osakue EE (2014) Probabilistic fatigue design of shaft for bending and torsion. Int J Res Eng and Technol 3(09). http://www.ijret.orgCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kapur KC, Lamberson LR (1977) Reliability in engineering design. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Reshetov D, Ivanov A, Fadeev V (1990) Reliability of machines. Mir Publishers, MoscowGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Li B, Yu Q (2017) A nonparametric test of independence between 2 variables. Stat Anal Data Min 10(6):422–435.  https://doi.org/10.1002/sam.11363MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Yimin Z (2015) Reliability-based robust design optimization of vehicle components. Front Mech Eng, Part I: Theory 10(2):138–144.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11465-015-0333-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Zuo F-J (2015) Reliability analysis of gear transmission with considering failure correlation. Maint Reliab 17(4):617–623.  https://doi.org/10.17531/ein.2015.4.19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chakraborti S, Qiu P, Mukherjee A (2015) Editorial to the special issue: Nonparametric statistical process control charts. Qual Reliab Eng Int 31(1):1–2.  https://doi.org/10.1002/qre.1759CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Li C, Mukherjee A, Xie M (2016) Robust algorithms for economic designing of a nonparametric control chart for abrupt shift in location. J Stat Comput Simul 86(2):306–323.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00949655.2015.1007985MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Tschannen M, Bolcskei H (2017) Robust nonparametric nearest neighbor random process clustering. IEEE Trans Signal Process 65(22):6009–6023.  https://doi.org/10.1109/TSP.2017.2736513MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chowdhury S, Mukherjee A, Chakraborti S (2014) A new distribution-free control chart for joint monitoring of unknown location and scale parameters of continuous distributions. Qual Reliab Eng Int 30(2):191–204.  https://doi.org/10.1002/qre.1488CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Christmann A, Zhou D-X (2016) Learning rates for the risk of kernel-based quantile regression estimators in additive models. Anal Appl 14(3):449–477.  https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219530515500050MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Porshnev SV (2015) Features of information flows in the backbone Internet-channel: The analysis of the statistical characteristics of the relationship between the number of packets and the time. In: AICT 2015: 9th international conference on application of information and communication technologies, vol l, p 437.  https://doi.org/10.1109/icaict.2015.7338596
  13. 13.
    Liu K. Du Q, Ren G (2017) Identification of differential alternative splicing events with an adjusted beta-distribution model. In: IEEE international conference on electro information technology, Lincoln, United States, Art No. 8053369:276–279.  https://doi.org/10.1109/eit.2017.8053369
  14. 14.
    Liu XX, Wu ZY, Wang QA (2014) Structural fragility estimation with beta-binomial distribution. Chin J Comput Mechanics 31(6):755–762.  https://doi.org/10.7511/jslx201406012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Méndez-González LC, Rodríguez-Picón LA, Valles-Rosales DJ at al (2017) Reliability analysis for electronic devices using beta-Weibull distribution. Qual Reliab Eng Int 33(8):2521–2530.  https://doi.org/10.1002/qre.2214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Peng X, Zheng W, Lin L, Liu Y (2016) Short-term load forecasting method based on outlier robust extreme learning machine considering adaptive load detection and repair. In: Proceedings of the Chinese Society of electrical engineering, vol 36(23), p 6409.  https://doi.org/10.13334/j.0258-8013.pcsee.160047
  17. 17.
    Cheng Y, Mukherjee A, Xie M (2017) Simultaneously monitoring frequency and magnitude of events based on bivariate gamma distribution. J Stat Comput Simul 87(9):1723–1741.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00949655.2017.1284846MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Dundu M (2017) Mathematical model to determine the weld resistance factor of asymmetrical strength results. Structures 12:298–305.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2017.10.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gorokhov VL, Kholodnyak DV (2016) Nonparametric statistics in multivariate time series for cognitive anomaly detection. In: Proceedings of the 19th international conference on soft computing and measurements, Art No 7519804, p 435.  https://doi.org/10.1109/scm.2016.7519804
  20. 20.
    Syzrantseva KV (2009) Development of a method to calculate the strength reliability of tooth gears based on the fatigue resistance when the teeth bend. J Mach Manuf Reliab 38(6):552–556.  https://doi.org/10.3103/S1052618809060065.10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Syzrantseva KV (2009) Predicting the failure of gear transmissions by nonparametric statistics. Russ Eng Res 29(2):1206–1208.  https://doi.org/10.3103/S1068798X09120028CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Parzen E (1960) Modern probability theory and its applications. Wiley, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Porshnev SV, Koposov AS (2014) Quantities’ estimation peculiarities of densities blur parameter of random sequences distribution in Parzen-Rosenblatt approximation. World Sci Discov Ser B 2(1):120–129Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Chen Y, Zhao Y, Bao E, Xing X (2015) Research on inter-story shear distribution of multi-story buckling restrained braced frame structures with high β values. Prog Steel Build Struct 17(3):39–46.  https://doi.org/10.13969/j.cnki.cn31-1893.2015.03.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Liu Y, Quek ST, Lee FH (2016) Translation random field with marginal beta distribution in modeling material properties. Struct Safety 61:57–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Syzrantseva K, Syzrantsev V (2016) Reliability estimation of machine parts with complicated geometry on a base of methods of nonparametric statistics. J Eng Appl Sci 11(2):204–209. doi: 0.3923/jeasci.2016.204.209Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Tyumen Industrial UniversityTyumenRussia
  2. 2.Bauman Moscow State Technical UniversityMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations