Advertisement

Development of Methodological Recommendations for Selection of Flexible Abrasive Tool by Performance Indicator

  • N. V. Syreyshchikova
  • E. N. Yaroslavova
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering book series (LNME)

Abstract

The results of the development of methodological recommendations on application of specific characteristics of tools on flexible basis (FAT) by performance indicators, issued by FAT passports, are given. The results of the development and selection of FAT indicators to correctly reflect the physical essence of the FAT processing are shown with a clear delineation of the set of indicators for the purpose of tools; the estimation of operational properties of abrasive tools on a flexible basis for roughing and finishing grinding operations is given; the results of determining the complex of the minimum necessary and sufficient number of evaluation indicators are shown. It is made clear that testing the workability of passports of various materials using grinding belts during the year has proved their effectiveness in designing the technology of manufacturing parts with a flexible abrasive tool, and the correction of cutting modes according to the FAT performance indicators has proved their practical importance.

Keywords

Methodological recommendations Workability passports Flexible abrasive tool Performance indicators 

References

  1. 1.
    Analysis of the market of abrasive tools on ceramic binder, abrasive tools on bakelite binder and abrasive tools on a flexible basis in RF, 2015–2016. http://www.ostu.ru/cont/tech article: 2521904162, Dec 2017
  2. 2.
    Abrasives. Uses wigening but improved quality moderating demand (2016) Ind Miner 46:9–28Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Information release (2016) Data for 12 months 2016. Inform. release, MoscowGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Butorin GI, Isakov VM, Ardashev DV (2012) Complex of operational parameters of abrasive tools. Theoretical and experimental studies of abrasive materials. UNSC of the USSR Academy of Sciences, Sverdlovsk, pp 25–30Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Guzeev VI, Syreyshchikov AA (2011) Stand for certification tests of a flexible abrasive tool, XX Russian School on Problems of Design of Inhomogeneous Constructions: Inform, Miass, pp 74–75Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Guzeev VI, Syreyshchikov AA (2014) Using the method of structuring the quality function for a flexible abrasive tool. Quality management of life, education, products and the environment in the regions of Russia. In: International scientific conference, Orel STU, Orel, pp 98–100Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Isakov DV (2014) Designing of productive grinding operations on the basis of a calculated definition of operating parameters of grinding wheels. Dissertation, University of ChelyabinskGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Syreischikova NV, Makarova EV, Boronina NM (2007) Quality control of fiber grinding discs according to performance indices in production conditions: unified methodology. MoscowGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Korchak SN, Koshin AA, Butorin GI (1979) Complex optimization model of grinding processes. Progressive methods of abrasive, diamond and elbor processing in mechanical engineering. NIIMASH, Moscow, pp 31–33Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kostin NV, Kostin AN, Ageev SS, Gubarev SV (2016) Increase of efficiency of belt grinding. Mach Tool 8:27–28Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Yuryev VG (2013) Processing with straightened abrasive belts. Diamond and abrasive machining of machine parts and tools. Interuniv Collect Sci Works 16:67–71Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Yakimov AV (2009) Abrasive-diamond processing of shaped surfaces. Mechanical Engineering, MoscowGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bayor BN, Semenov AV (2011) Methodology of the calculation determination of the characteristics of an abrasive tool. STIN 2:15–18Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Borisov VB, Bolshagin NP (2014) Precision and productivity grinding processing. Sci Prod 7:20–21Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Maslov EN (2011) Theory of metal grinding. Mechanical Engineering, MoscowGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Nosenko VA, Nosenko SV (2015) Technology of grinding metals. MoscowGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Stratievsky IK, Yuryev VG, Zubarev YuM (2010) Abrasive treatment: reference book. Engineering, MoscowGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ryabtsev SA (2011) Development of the abrasive tool with the raised structureness and operated porosity. Dissertation, University of MoscowGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Agasaryan RR (1985) Dependence of the bearing capacity of the surface layer on the method of finish abrasive processing. Bull Mach Build 8:66–68Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ivanov YuI, Nosov NV (2012) Efficiency and quality of processing tools on a flexible basis. Machine-building, MoscowGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kostin NV Study of the process of belt grinding of high-strength and wear-resistant steels. Dissertation, University of PermGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Baboshkin AF, Zubarev YuM, Pirozerskaya OL (2009) Parameters of the abrasive belt working surface during operation. Abrasive processing processes, abrasive tools and materials. Articles of international scientific conference Shlifabraziv VolgGASA, 17–18 May 2009Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Baboshkin AF, Pirozerskaya OL (2009) Change of geometric parameters of abrasive grains in the process of wear of abrasive belts. Abrasive processing processes, abrasive tools and materials. Articles of international scientific conference Shlifabraziv VolgGASA, 17–18 May 2009Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Baboshkin AF, Pirozerskaya OL (2009) Changes in the geometric parameters of abrasive grains in the process of wear of abrasive belts. Processes of abrasive processing, abrasive tools and materials. In: Coll. of articles of international scientific-technical conf Volzhsky, VolgGASA, pp 64–66Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Buchner S (2015) Schleifscheibenhökte und Bindun-gemenge bei Keramischen Schleifscheiben. Vorträge der Konferenz über Herstellung und Anwendung vön Schleifscheiben. UngarnGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Meyer K (2014) Das Hochleistungs-Bandschleifen und von zwei Einsatzbeispielen. Macchine 3:15–16Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Seward W (2015) Abrasive belt grinding and polishing. Do best work if basic principles applied. Can Mach Metalwork 2:57–55Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Zaitseva MA, Ulanova ME, Skochko AP (2002) Operational features of a grinding skins on special synthetic ties. Tools for highly effective grinding. VNIIAH NIIMASH, Chelyabinsk, pp 24–31Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.South Ural State UniversityChelyabinskRussia

Personalised recommendations