Advertisement

Relative Contact Area by Indentation and Flattening of Rough Surfaces Spherical Asperities

  • P. Ogar
  • D. Gorokhov
  • E. Ugryumova
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering book series (LNME)

Abstract

The paper indicates that the application of roughness models and the theories of contacting rough surfaces developed by Greenwood–Williamson and N. B. Demkin for solving the problems of hermetology leads to significant errors. This is explained by much greater contact pressures than assumed for the tribology problems, describing only the initial part of the reference surface curve and the lack of allowance for the plastic extrusion of the material. A brief review of methods for describing the introduction of a sphere into an elastoplastic reinforced half-space is given. The properties of the elastoplastic reinforced material are described by the power law of Hollomon. To describe the indentation and flattening of single spherical asperity, the results of finite element modeling are used. The cases of contacting a rigid rough surface with an elastoplastic half-space and a rigid smooth surface with a rough surface are considered. To determine the relative contact area, the discrete roughness model is used in the form of a set of spherical segments distributed along the height in accordance with the curve of the reference surface.

Keywords

Rough surface Relative contact area Spherical asperity Elastoplastic contact Hardened material Indentation of the sphere Flattening of the sphere 

References

  1. 1.
    Greenwood JA, Williamson JBR (1966) Contact of nominally flat sufaces. Proc Roy Soc A295:301–313Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Demkin NB (1970) Contacting rough surfaces. Nauka, MoscowGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ogar PM, Gorokhov DB, Kozhevnikov AS (2017) Contact tasks in hermetic sealing studies of fixed joints. BrSU, BratskGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ogar PM, Gorokhov DB, Elsukov VK (2017) Criteria for the appearance of plastic deformations at contacting rough surfaces of joints in technological equipment. Syst Meth Tech 3(35):32–39.  https://doi.org/10.18324/2077-5415-2017-3-32-39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kazankin VA (2016) Development of a technique for calculating the strength of fixed joints, taking into account the contact stiffness of matched parts of close hardness. Dissertation, VolSTU, VolgogradGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lankov AA (2009) The probability of elastic and plastic deformations during compression of metallic rough surfaces. Trenie-i-smazka-v-mashinah-i-mekhanizmah 3:3–5Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Voronin NA (2003) Theoretical model of elastic-plastic introduction of rigid sphere. J frict Wear 24:16–26Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ogar PM, Tarasov VA (2013) Kinetic indentation application to determine contact characteristics of sphere and elastoplastic half-space. Adv Mat Res 664: 625–631. www.scientific.net/AMR.664.625CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ogar PM, Tarasov VA, Turchenko AV (2013) Tribomechanics of elastoplastic contact. Modern Technol Syst Model 2(18):116–122Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Drozd MS, Matlin MM, Sidyakin YI (1986) Engineering methods for calculating elastoplastic contact deformation. In: Mechanical engineering, MoscowGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lee H, Lee JH, Pharr GM (2005) A numerical approach to spherical indentation techniques for material property evaluation. J Mech Phys Solids 53:2037–2069CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Collin JM, Mauvoisin G, Pilvin P (2010) Materials characterization by instrumented indentation using two different approaches. Mater Des 31:636–640CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Johnson KL (1985) Contact mechanics. University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hernot X, Bartier O, Bekouche Y, El Abdi R, Mauvoisin G (2006) Influence of penetration depth and mechanical properties on contact radius determination for spherical indentation. Int J Solids Struct 43:4136–4153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Myshkin NK, Petrokovec MI (2007) Friction, lubrication, wear. In: Physical bases and technical applications of tribology. Fizmatlit, MoscowGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bolotov AN, Meshkov VV, Sutyagin OV, Vasiliev MV (2013) Study of elastoplastic contact of a spherical indenter with metals and solid lubricating coatings: Part 1. Critical loads. J Friction Wear 34:1–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bolotov AN, Meshkov VV, Sutyagin OV, Vasiliev MV (2013) Study of elastoplastic contact of a spherical indenter with metals and solid lubricating coatings: Part 2. Contact characteristics. J Friction Wear 34:129–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ogar P, Gorokhov D (2017) Meyer law application to account of material hardening under rigid spherical indentation. In: Proceedings of 22nd international conference “MECHANIKA 2017”. KUT, Kaunas pp 287–290Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ogar P, Gorokhov D, Belokobylsky S (2017) The elastic-plastic contact of a single asperity of a rough surface. In: MATEC web of conferences vol 129, p 06017.  https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201712906017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bulychev SI (2010) The transition from the indentation diagrams to the tensile diagrams with allowance for the hardened surface layer. Deformation Fract Mater 2:43–48Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Bulychev SI (2011) Hardness and hysteresis at the yield strength. Deformation Fract Mater 1:41–45Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Matlin M, Kazankina E, Kazankin V (2009) initial. Mechanika 2:20–23Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Etision I, Kligerman Y, Kadin Y (2005) Unloading of an elastic–plastic loaded spherical contact. Int J Solids Struct 42:3716–3729CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kogut L, Etision I (2002) Elastic–plastic contact analysis of a sphere and a rigid flat. ASME J Appl Mech 69:657–662CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Zhao JH, Nagao S, Zhang ZI (2012) Loading and aunloadingnloading of a spherical contact: From elastic to elastic-perfectly plastic materials. Int J Mech Sci 56:70–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ogar PM, Gorokhov DB (2017) Influence of materials hardenability parameters on the machine parts characteristics after unloading. Key Eng Mat 723:369–375. www.scientific.net/KEM.723.369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ogar P, Gorokhov D, Ugryumova E (2017) Mechanics of unloading of a rough surfaces pre-loaded joint. In: MATEC Web of conference vil 129, p 06016.  https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201712906016CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Bratsk State UniversityBratskRussia

Personalised recommendations