Advertisement

Visualization of Infants’ Behavior at Home Using Augmented Reality for Promotion of Development and Prevention of Accidents

  • Miho Nishizaki
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 809)

Abstract

This study presents a prototype of an augmented reality (AR) mobile application aimed at visualizing infants’ natural-setting motor and cognitive development for prevention of accidents and promotion of development. To provide adults with better understanding about the infants’ encounters with surrounding objects by visualization of actual recoded data, the study comprised three steps. First, we conducted longitudinal observations of 10 infants (6 males, 4 females), aged 4–12 months, at their homes in Tokyo, Japan. Second, we developed an AR application for iPhones and iPads, by using vision-based marker tracking technique. Based on the observations, 10 most frequently observed objects were adapted as markers for AR. To ensure privacy and to focus on infant–object interactions, we converted all AR movies to line drawings. Third, we conducted informal user interviews and user tests to confirm the method’s validity and usability. The longitudinal observational data shed light on the infants’ perceptions and actions, helping to clarify not only developmental possibilities but also risks of accidents. The user interview suggested that our prototype could scope out the home from infants and can help adults to obtain insights for encouraging child development and reevaluating childproofing home as an ongoing process.

Keywords

Augmented reality Accident Development Affordance 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) KAKENHI Grant Number 16K21263.

References

  1. 1.
    Sutherland, I.: A head-mounted three-dimensional display. Washington In: Proceedings of FJCC 1968, Thompson Books, DC, pp. 757–764 (1968)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Aukstakalnis, S.: Practical Augmented Reality: A Guide to the Technologies, Applications, and Human Factors for AR and VR, 1st edn. Addison-Wesley (2016)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Azuma, R.T.: A survey of augmented reality, presence-teleoperators and virtual environments, 6(4), 355–385 (1892)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Billinghurst, M., Clark, A., Lee, G.: A survey of augmented reality, foundations and trends in human-computer interaction, 8(2–3), 73–272 (2015)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Azuma, R., Billinghurst, M., Klinker, G.: Editorial: special section on mobile augmented reality. Comput. Graph. 35(4), vii–viii (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mohring, M., Lessig, C., Bimber, O.: Video see-through AR on consumer cell-phones. In: Proceedings of the 3rd IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality, pp. 252–253. IEEE Computer Society (2004)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
  8. 8.
    The Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare of Japan. List of Statistical Surveys. Vital Statistics 2016, https://www.e-stat.go.jp/en/stat-search/files?page=1&layout=datalist&tstat=000001028897&year=20160&month=0&tclass1=000001053058&tclass2=000001053061&tclass3=000001053066&result_back=1. Last accessed 2018/05/03
  9. 9.
    The National Safety Council of US Homepage, http://www.rospa.com/homesafety/adviceandinformation/childsafety/accidents-to-children.aspx. Last accessed 2018/05/03
  10. 10.
    CONSUMER SAFETY UNIT: 24th Annual Report, Home Accident Surveillance System. Department of Trade and Industry, London (2002)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    The U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission. https://www.cpsc.gov/s3fs-public/5013.pdf. Last accessed 2018/05/03
  12. 12.
    Carlsson, A., Dykes, A. K., Jansson, A., Bramhagen, A.C.: Mothers’ awareness towards child injuries and injury prevention at home: an intervention study.” BMC Research Notes 9 (2016): 223. PMC. Web. Last accessed 2018/05/03Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kendrick, D., Mulvaney, C.A., Ye, L., Stevens, T., Mytton, J.A., Stewart-Brown, S.: Parenting interventions and the prevention of unintentional injuries in childhood: systematic review and meta-analysis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Mar 28; (3):CD006020. Epub last accessed 2018/05/03Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Morrongiello, B.A., Kiriakou, S.: Mothers’ home-safety practices for preventing six types of childhood injuries: what do they do, and why? J. Pediatr. Psychol. 29(4), 285–297 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Carlsson, A., Dykes, A.K.: Precautions taken by mothers to prevent burn and scald injuries to young children at home: an intervention study. Scand. J. Public Health (2011)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gibson, J.J.: The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Houghton Mifflin, Boston (1979)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Caudell, T.P., Mizell, D.W.: Augmented reality: an application of heads-up display technology to manual manufacturing processes. In: System Sciences, 1992. Proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth Hawaii International Conference, vol. 2, pp. 659–669. IEEE (1992)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Tokyo Metropolitan UniversityHinoJapan

Personalised recommendations