Skip to main content

Are Tinder and Dating Apps Changing Dating and Mating in the USA?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Families and Technology

Part of the book series: National Symposium on Family Issues ((NSFI,volume 9))

Abstract

I use in-depth interviews and a new national survey to examine how people use phone dating apps (such as Tinder and Grindr), how often they use them, and why. Gay men are the most active users of the phone dating apps. Unpartnered heterosexual adults do not use phone dating apps very often and meet few new partners through apps. According to the survey data, more than 80% of unpartnered heterosexual adults have not gone on any dates or met any new people in the past 12 months, which suggests that being unpartnered is a more stable status for heterosexual adults than previously thought.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Best, J., & Bogle, K. A. (2014). Kids gone wild: From rainbow parties to sexting, understanding the hype over teen sex. New York, NY: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bogle, K. A. (2008). Hooking up: Sex, dating and relationships on campus. New York, NY: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cacioppo, J. T., Cacioppo, S., Gonzaga, G., Ogburn, E. L., & VanderWeele, T. J. (2013). Marital satisfaction and break-ups differ across on-line and off-line meeting venues. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110(25), 10135–10140. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1222447110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D’Emilio, J. (2002). The world turned: Essays on gay history, politics, and culture. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • DePaulo, B. (2006). Singled out: How singles are stereotyped, stigmatized, and ignored, and still live happily ever after. New York, NY: St. Martin’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elder, G. H., Jr. (1975). Age differentiation in the life course. Annual Review of Sociology, 1, 165–190 Retrieved from https://www.annualreviews.org/doi/abs/10.1146/annurev.so.01.080175.001121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glassner, B. (2010). The culture of fear: Why Americans are afraid of the wrong things (10th ed.). New York, NY: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeong, S. (2013). Revenge porn is bad. Criminalizing it is worse. Wired.com. Retrieved October 2017, from https://www.wired.com/2013/10/why-criminalizing-revenge-porn-is-a-bad-idea/

  • Klinenberg, E. (2012). Going solo: The extraordinary rise and surprising appeal of living alone. New York, NY: Penguin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laumann, E. O., Gagnon, J. H., Michael, R. T., & Michaels, S. (1994). The social organization of sexuality: Sexual practices in the United States. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewontin, R. C. (1995, April 20). Sex, lies, and social science. The New York Review of Books. Retrieved from http://www.nybooks.com/articles/1995/04/20/sex-lies-and-social-science/

  • Lohmann, R. C. (2013, April 7). Teen sexting—the real issue: Common problems associated with teen sexting. Psychology Today. Retrieved from https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/teen-angst/201304/teen-sexting-the-real-issue

  • Manning, J. C. (2006). The impact of Internet pornography on marriage and the family: A review of the research. Sexual Addiction & Compulsivity, 13(2/3), 131–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Massey, A. (2015, April 30). The dickonomics of Tinder: Yes, women are using Tinder to get laid. No, not with you. medium.com. Retrieved from https://medium.com/matter/the-dickonomics-of-tinder-b14956c0c2c7#.koj7c3pu7

  • McKenna, K. Y. A., & Bargh, J. A. (1998). Coming out in the age of the Internet: Identity “demarginalization” through virtual group participation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(3), 681–694.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKenna, K. Y. A., & Bargh, J. A. (2000). Plan 9 from cyberspace: The implications of the Internet for personality and social psychology. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4(1), 57–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oppenheimer, V. K. (1988). A theory of marriage timing. American Journal of Sociology, 94(3), 563–591.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenfeld, M. J. (2007). The age of independence: Interracial unions, same-sex unions, and the changing American family. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenfeld, M. J. (2014). Couple longevity in the era of same-sex marriage in the United States. Journal of Marriage and Family, 76(5), 905–918.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenfeld, M. J. (2017). Marriage, choice and couplehood in the age of the Internet. Sociological Science, 4, 490–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenfeld, M. J. (2018). Who wants the breakup? Gender and breakup in heterosexual couples. In D. F. Alwin, D. Felmlee, & D. Kreager (Eds.), Social networks and the life course: Integrating the development of human lives and social relational networks (pp. 221–243). New York, NY: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenfeld, M. J., & Thomas, R. J. (2012). Searching for a mate: The rise of the Internet as a social intermediary. American Sociological Review, 77(4), 523–547.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenfeld, M. J., Thomas, R. J., & Falcon, M. (2015). How couples meet and stay together (waves 1, 2, and 3 version 3.04; wave 4 supplement version 1.02; wave 5 supplement version 1.0). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Libraries Retrieved from http://data.stanford.edu/hcmst

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenfeld, M. J., Thomas, R. J., & Hausen, S. (2018). How couples meet and stay together: 2017 fresh sample. [computer files]. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Libraries Retrieved from http://data.stanford.edu/hcmst

    Google Scholar 

  • Sales, N. J. (2015, September). Tinder and the dawn of the ‘dating apocalypse’. Vanity Fair. Retrieved from http://www.vanityfair.com/culture/2015/08/tinder-hook-up-culture-end-of-dating

  • Sassler, S., & Miller, A. J. (2011). Waiting to be asked: Gender, power, and relationship progression among cohabiting couples. Journal of Family Issues, 32(4), 482–506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slater, D. (2013). Love in the time of algorithms: What technology does to meeting and mating. New York, NY: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turkle, S. (2011). Alone together: Why we expect more from our technology and less from each other. New York, NY: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turkle, S. (2015). Reclaiming conversation: The power of talk in a digital age. New York, NY: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waite, L. J., & Gallagher, M. (2000). The case for marriage: Why married people are happier, healthier, and better off financially. New York, NY: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weigel, M. (2016). Labor of love: The invention of dating. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wellman, B. (2001). Physical place and cyberplace: The rise of personalized networking. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 25(2), 227–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young, K. S. (1998). Caught in the net: How to recognize the signs of Internet addiction—and a winning strategy for recovery. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Rosenfeld .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix: Description of the HCMST 2017 Data, Unweighted Sample Size with Weighted Row and Weighted Column Percentages

Appendix: Description of the HCMST 2017 Data, Unweighted Sample Size with Weighted Row and Weighted Column Percentages

Relationship status

Heterosexual

Sexual identity

Sexual identity unknown

Total

Gay, lesbian, or bisexual

Married

1886 (96.8%) [63.8%]

193 (2.9%) [35.6%]

6 (0.4%)

2085 (100%) [59.9%]

Partnered, but not married

544 (90.0%) [21.0%]

233 (10.0%) [43.7%]

0

777 (100%) [21.2%]

Unpartnered, but has had a partner in the past

413 (92.5%) [15.2%]

125 (6.7%) [20.7%]

3 (0.8%)

541 (100%) [14.9%]

Never had a partner

0

0

107

107 [4.0%]

Total

2843 (90.9%) [100%]

551 (4.9%) [100%]

116 (4.3%)

3510 (100%) [100%]

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Rosenfeld, M. (2018). Are Tinder and Dating Apps Changing Dating and Mating in the USA?. In: Van Hook, J., McHale, S., King, V. (eds) Families and Technology. National Symposium on Family Issues, vol 9. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95540-7_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics