Advertisement

Systems

  • Nicole Curato
  • Marit Hammond
  • John B. Min
Chapter
Part of the Political Philosophy and Public Purpose book series (POPHPUPU)

Abstract

This chapter takes a broad view of deliberative politics beyond the forum. It examines the field’s ‘systemic turn’ as a normative, empirical, and a political project, with each dimension appreciating deliberative democracy’s operation in an imperfect speech situation. Placing the issue of power at the centre of analysis not only identifies obstructions in the circulation of inclusive and contesting discourses, but also examines the possibilities for democratic renewal. Power plays an ambiguous and sometimes contradictory role in the deliberative system. The challenge is to critically examine the context in which these exercises of power take place.

References

  1. Bachrach, Peter, and Morton Baratz. 1962. Two Faces of Power. The American Political Science Review 56 (4): 947–952.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bächtiger, André, and Simon Beste. 2017. Deliberative Citizens, (Non)Deliberative Politicians: A Rejoinder. Daedalus 146 (3): 106–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bächtiger, André, and John Parkinson. Forthcoming. Mapping and Measuring Deliberation: Towards a New Deliberative Quality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Baym, Geoffrey. 2005. The Daily Show: Discursive Integration and the Reinvention of Political Journalism. Political Communication 22 (3): 259–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Beauvais, Edana, and André Bächtiger. 2016. Taking the Goals of Deliberation Seriously: A Differentiated View on Equality and Equity in Deliberative Designs and Processes. Journal of Public Deliberation 12(2): Article 2.Google Scholar
  6. Bell, Daniel. 2015. The China Model: Political Meritocracy and the Limits of Democracy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bevir, Mark. 2006. Democratic Governance: Systems and Radical Perspectives. Public Administration Review 66 (3): 426–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Boswell, John. 2016. Deliberating Downstream: Countering Democratic Distortions in the Policy Process. Perspectives on Politics 14 (3): 724–737.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Boswell, John, and Jack Corbett. 2017. Deliberative Bureaucracy: Reconciling Democracy’s Trade-Off Between Inclusion and Economy. Political Studies. First published October 2, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Boswell, John, Carolyn Hendriks, and Selen Ercan. 2016. Message Received? Examining Transmission in Deliberative Systems. Critical Policy Studies 10 (3): 263–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Boukes, Mark, Hajo G. Boomgaarden, Marjolein Moorman, and Claes de Vreese. 2015. At Odds: Laughing and Thinking? The Appreciation, Processing, and Persuasiveness of Political Satire. Journal of Communication 65 (5): 721–744.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Brennan, Jason. 2016. Against Democracy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cabañero-Verzosa, Cecilia, and Helen Garcia. 2009. Building Commitment to Reform Through Strategic Communication: The Five Key Decisions. Washington, DC: The World Bank.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chambers, Simone. 2009. Rhetoric and the Public Sphere: Has Deliberative Democracy Abandoned Mass Democracy? Political Theory 37 (3): 323–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. ———. 2017. Balancing Epistemic Quality and Equal Participation in a System Approach to Deliberative Democracy. Social Epistemology 31 (3): 266–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Chouliaraki, Lilie. 2008. The Media as Moral Education: Mediation and Action. Media, Culture & Society 30 (6): 831–852.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. ———. 2013. Mediating Vulnerability: Cosmopolitanism and the Public Sphere. Media, Culture & Society 35 (1): 105–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Christiano, Thomas. 2012. Rational Deliberation Among Experts and Citizens. In Deliberative Systems: Deliberative Democracy at the Large Scale, ed. John Parkinson and Jane Mansbridge, 27–51. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Coleman, Stephen. 2013. Debate on Television: The Spectacle of Deliberation. Television & New Media 14 (1): 20–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Cottle, Simon. 2009. Global Crises in the News: Staging New Wars, Disasters, and Climate Change. International Journal of Communication 3: 494–517.Google Scholar
  21. Cottle, Simon, and Mugdha Rai. 2006. Between Display and Deliberation: Analyzing TV News as Communicative Architecture. Media, Culture & Society 28 (2): 163–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Couldry, Nick, Sonia Livingstone, and Tim Markham. 2007. Media Consumption and Public Engagement: Beyond the Presumption of Attention. Revised and Updated Edition. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  23. Curato, Nicole. 2012. A Sequential Analysis of Democratic Deliberation. Acta Politica 47 (4): 432–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Dagnes, Alison. 2012. A Conservative Walks Into a Bar: The Politics of Political Humor. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Davies, Nick. 2011. Flat Earth News: An Award-winning Reporter Exposes Falsehood, Distortion and Propaganda in the Global Media. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  26. Dobson, Andrew. 2014. Listening for Democracy: Recognition, Representation, Reconciliation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Dryzek, John. 2001. Legitimacy and Economy in Deliberative Democracy. Political Theory 29 (5): 651–669.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. ———. 2010. Foundations and Frontiers of Deliberative Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Dubois, Elizabeth, and Grant Blank. 2018. The Echo Chamber Is Overstated: The Moderating Effect of Political Interest and Diverse Media. Information, Communication & Society 21 (5): 729–745.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Dunne, Finley Peter. 1906. Observations by Mr. Dooley [pseud.]. New York: Harper & Brothers.Google Scholar
  31. Ebeling, Martin, and Fabio Wolkenstein. 2017. Exercising Deliberative Agency in Deliberative Systems. Political Studies. First published September 29, 2017.Google Scholar
  32. Edwards, Sophie. 2018. Accountability in the Aid Sector: Humanitarians Can No Longer Be Above the Law. Devex.com. https://www.devex.com/news/accountability-in-the-aid-sectorhumanitarians-humanitarians-can-no-longer-be-above-the-law-92133?utm_source=Article&utm_medium=Link&utm_campaign=LSS3. Accessed 9 Aug 2018.
  33. Elstub, Stephen, Selen Ercan, and Ricardo Fabrino Mendonça. 2016. The Fourth Generation of Deliberative Democracy. Critical Policy Studies 10 (2): 139–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Evans, Peter. 2004. Development as Institutional Change: The Pitfalls of Monocropping and the Potentials of Deliberation. Studies in Comparative International Development 38 (4): 30–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Fishkin, James. 2018. Democracy When the People Are Thinking Revitalizing Our Politics Through Public Deliberation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Flynn, Jeffrey. 2004. Communicative Power in Habermas’s Theory of Democracy. European Journal of Political Theory 3 (4): 433–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Gerhardt, Uta. 2002. Talcott Parsons: An Intellectual Biography. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Giddens, Anthony. 1968. ‘Power’ in the Recent Writings of Talcott Parsons. Sociology 2 (3): 257–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Goodin, Robert. 2008. Innovating Democracy: Democratic Theory and Practice After the Deliberative Turn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Guess, Andrew, Benjamin Lyons, Brendan Nyhan, and Jason Reifler. 2018. Avoiding the Echo Chamber About Echo Chambers: Why Selective Exposure to Like-Minded Political News Is Less Prevalent than You Think. Miami: John S. And James L. Knight Foundation.Google Scholar
  41. Gunn, Paul, ed. 2014. Democratic Deliberation in the Modern World. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  42. Guo, Baogang. 2006. Political Legitimacy in China’s Transition: Toward a Market Economy. In China’s Deep Reform: Domestic Politics in Transition, ed. Lowell Dittmer and Guoli Liu, 147–176. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.Google Scholar
  43. Habermas, Jürgen. 1971. Toward a Rational Society: Student Protest, Science, and Politics. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  44. ———. 1996. Between Facts and Norms Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Trans. by William Rehg. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  45. ———. 2006. Political Communication in Media Society: Does Democracy Still Enjoy an Epistemic Dimension? The Impact of Normative Theory on Empirical Research. Communication Theory 16 (4): 411–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Hammond, Marit. 2018. Deliberative Democracy as a Critical Theory. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy. First published February 13, 2018.Google Scholar
  47. Hansson, Niklas, and Kerstin Jacobsson. 2014. Learning to Be Affected: Subjectivity, Sense, and Sensibility in Animal Rights Activism. Society and Animals 22: 262–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Hendriks, Carolyn. 2006. Integrated Deliberation: Reconciling Civil Society’s Dual Role in Deliberative Democracy. Political Studies 54 (3): 486–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Humphrey, Matthew, and Mark Stears. 2006. Animal Rights Protest and the Challenge to Deliberative Democracy. Economy and Society. 35: 400–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Johnston, Jane, and Susan Forde. 2017. Churnalism: Revised and Revisited. Digital Journalism 5 (8): 943–946.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Jones, Jeffrey. 2010. Entertaining Politics: Satiric Television and Political Engagement. 2nd ed. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.Google Scholar
  52. Juris, Jeffrey S. 2008. Performing Politics: Image, Embodiment, and Affective Solidarity During Anti-corporate Globalization Protests. Ethnography 9 (1): 61–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Kahneman, Daniel. 2011. Thinking, Fast and Slow. London: Penguin Books Limited.Google Scholar
  54. Keane, John. 2014. Democracy and Media Decadence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  55. ———. Forthcoming. Humbling Power: Monitory Democracy and its Future. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  56. Kuyper, Jonathan. 2015. Democratic Deliberation in the Modern World: The Systemic Turn. Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 27 (1): 49–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. ———. 2017. The Means and Ends of Deliberative Democracy: Rejoinder to Gunn. Critical Review 29 (3): 328–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Kuyper, Jonathan, and Fabio Wolkenstein. 2017. Counteracting Failures of Representative Institutions: When and How to Use Mini-Publics. Paper prepared for the ECPR General Conference, Oslo, Norway. September 6–9, 2017.Google Scholar
  59. Kyamusugulwa, Patrick Milabyo. 2013. Participatory Development and Reconstruction: A Literature Review. Third World Quarterly 34 (7): 1265–1278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Lafont, Cristina. 2015. Deliberation, Participation, and Democratic Legitimacy: Should Deliberative Mini-Publics Shape Public Policy? The Journal of Political Philosophy 23 (1): 40–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Landemore, Hélène. 2013. Democratic Reason: Politics, Collective Intelligence, and the Rule of the Many. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  62. Lazarus, Joel. 2008. Participation in Poverty Reduction Strategy Papers: Reviewing the Past, Assessing the Present and Predicting the Future. Third World Quarterly 29 (6): 1205–1221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Lupia, Arthur, and Anne Norton. 2017. Inequality Is Always in the Room: Language & Power in Deliberative Democracy. Daedalus 146 (3): 64–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Lyon, Arabella. 2013. Deliberative Acts: Democracy, Rhetoric, and Rights. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
  65. Mansbridge, Jane. 1996. Using Power/Fighting Power: The Polity. In Democracy and Difference: Contesting the Boundaries of the Political, ed. Seyla Benhabib, 46–66. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  66. ———. 1999. Everyday Talk in the Deliberative System. In Deliberative Politics: Essays on Democracy and Disagreement, ed. Stephen Macedo, 211–242. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  67. ———. 2012. Recursive Representation in the Representative System. Paper presented at the 2017 annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, San Francisco. https://www.dropbox.com/s/gi18fmwlxjm7gmn/MANSBRIDGE_Recursive%20Representation.pdf?dl=0. Accessed 4 May 2018.
  68. Mansbridge, Jane, James Bohman, Simone Chambers, Thomas Christiano, Archon Fung, John Parkinson, Dennis Thompson, and Mark Warren. 2012. A Systematic Approach to Deliberative Democracy. In Deliberative Systems: Deliberative Democracy at the Large Scale, ed. John Parkinson and Jane Mansbridge, 1–26. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  69. Mansuri, Ghazala, and Vijayendra Rao. 2013. Can Participation Be Induced? Some evidence From Developing Countries. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 16 (2): 284–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Maxwell, Simon. 2001. WDR 2000: Is There a New ‘New Poverty Agenda’? Development Policy Review 19 (1): 143–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. McClennen, Sophia, and Remy Maisel. 2014. Satire Saving Our Nation?: Mockery and American Politics. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Mendonça, Ricardo Fabrino. 2016. Mitigating Systemic Dangers: The Role of Connectivity Inducers in a Deliberative System. Critical Policy Studies 10 (2): 171–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Menocal, Alina Rocha, and Bhavna Sharma. 2008. Joint Evaluation of Citizens’ Voice and Accountability. London: Department for International Development.Google Scholar
  74. Mihailidis, Paul, and Samantha Viotty. 2017. Spreadable Spectacle in Digital Culture: Civic Expression, Fake News, and the Role of Media Literacies in ‘Post-Fact’ Society. American Behavioral Scientist 61 (4): 441–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Min, John. 2014. Review of Deliberative Systems: Deliberative Democracy at the Large Scale edited by John Parkinson and Jane Mansbridge (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2012). Journal of Public Deliberation 10 (2): 1–4.Google Scholar
  76. Min, John B., and James K. Wong. 2018. Epistemic Approaches to Deliberative Democracy. Philosophy Compass 13 (6): e12497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Montanaro, Laura. 2012. The Democratic Legitimacy of Self-Appointed Representatives. The Journal of Politics 74 (4): 1094–1107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Moore, Alfred. 2016. Deliberative Elitism? Distributed Deliberation and the Organization of Epistemic Inequality. Critical Policy Studies 10 (2): 191–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Morrison, Kevin, and Matthew Singer. 2007. Inequality and Deliberative Development: Revisiting Bolivia’s Experience with the PRSP. Development Policy Review 25 (6): 721–740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Narayan, Deepa. 2005. Conceptual Framework and Methodological Challenges. In Measuring Empowerment: Cross-disciplinary Perspectives, ed. Deepa Narayan, 3–38. Washington, DC: The World Bank.Google Scholar
  81. O’Flynn, Ian. 2006. Deliberative Democracy and Divided Societies. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
  82. O’Neill, Tammie, Marta Foresti, and Alan Hudson. 2007. Evaluation of Citizens’ Voice and Accountability: Review of the Literature and Donor Approaches. London: Department for International Development.Google Scholar
  83. Orgad, Shani. 2012. Media Representation and the Global Imagination. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  84. Oshima, Kaori. 2013. What Have Been the Impacts of World Bank CDD Programs?: Operational and Research Implications. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
  85. Owen, David, and Graham Smith. 2015. Survey Article: Deliberation, Democracy, and the Systemic Turn. The Journal of Political Philosophy 23 (2): 213–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Parkinson, John. 2006. Rickety Bridges: Using the Media in Deliberative Democracy. British Journal of Political Science 36 (1): 175–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Parkinson, John, and Jane Mansbridge, eds. 2012. Deliberative Systems: Deliberative Democracy at the Large Scale. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  88. Parry, Lucy J. 2017. Don’t Put All Your Speech-acts in One Basket: Situating Animal Activism in the Deliberative System. Environmental Values 26 (4): 437–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Parsons, Talcott. 1951. Social Systems. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  90. Parthasarathy, Ramya, Vijayendra Rao, and Nethra Palaniswamy. 2017. Unheard Voices: The Challenge of Inducing Women’s Civic Speech. Policy Research Working Paper. Washington, DC: The World Bank.Google Scholar
  91. Pogrebinschi, Thamy. 2013. The Squared Circle of Participatory Democracy: Scaling Up Deliberation to the National Level. Critical Policy Studies 7 (3): 219–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Prior, Markus. 2005. News vs. Entertainment: How Increasing Media Choice Widens Gaps in Political Knowledge and Turnout. American Journal of Political Science 49 (3): 577–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Przeworski, Adam. 1998. Deliberation and Ideological Domination. In Deliberative Democracy, ed. Jon Elster, 140–160. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Rückert, Arne. 2007. Producing Neo-Liberal Hegemony? A Neo-Gramscian Analysis of the Poverty Reduction Strategy Paper (PRSP) in Nicaragua. Studies in Political Economy 79: 91–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Ryan, Matthew, and Graham Smith. 2014. Defining Mini-Publics. In Deliberative Mini-Publics Involving Citizens in the Democratic Process, ed. Kimmo Grönlund, André Bächtiger, and Maija Setälä, 9–26. Colchester: ECPR Press.Google Scholar
  96. Saward, Michael. 2014. Shape-Shifting Representation. American Political Science Review 108 (4): 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Searing, Donald, Frederick Solt, Pamela Johnston Conover, and Ivor Crewe. 2007. Public Discussion in the Deliberative System: Does It Make Better Citizens? British Journal of Political Science 37 (4): 587–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Self, Will. 2015. A Point of View: What’s the Point of Satire? BBC News. February 13. http://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-31442441. Accessed 22 April 2018.
  99. Sen, Amartya. 2001. Development as Freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  100. Silverstone, Roger. 2006. Media and Morality: On the Rise of the Mediapolis. Hoboken: Wiley.Google Scholar
  101. Smith, William. 2016. The Boundaries of a Deliberative System: The Case of Disruptive Protest. Critical Policy Studies 10 (2): 152–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Stark, Luke, and Kate Crawford. 2015. The Conservatism of Emoji: Work, Affect, and Communication. Social Media+ Society 1 (2): 1–11.Google Scholar
  103. Stevenson, Hayley, and John Dryzek. 2014. Democratizing Global Climate Governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  104. Stokes, Susan. 1998. Pathologies of Deliberation. In Deliberative Democracy, ed. Jon Elster, 123–139. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Stone, Deborah. 2012. Policy Paradox: The Art of Political Decision Making. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
  106. Teorell, Jan. 1999. A Deliberative Defence of Intra-Party Democracy. Party Politics 5 (3): 363–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Tormey, Simon. 2015. The End of Representative Politics. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  108. Urbinati, Nadia. 2010. Unpolitical Democracy. Political Theory 38 (1): 65–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Van Aelst, Peter, Jesper Strömbäck, Toril Aalberg, Frank Esser, Claes de Vreese, Jörg Matthes, David Hopmann, Susana Salgado, Nicolas Hubé, Agnieszka Stępińska, Stylianos Papathanassopoulos, Rosa Berganza, Guido Legnante, Carsten Reinemann, Tamir Sheafer, and James Stanyer. 2017. Political Communication in a High-choice Media Environment: A Challenge for Democracy? Annals of the International Communication Association 41 (1): 3–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Wahl-Jorgensen, Karin. 2001. Letters to the Editor as a Forum for Public Deliberation: Modes of Publicity and Democratic Debate. Critical Studies in Media Communication 18 (3): 303–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Wanzo, Rebecca. 2015. The Suffering Will Not Be Televised: African American Women and Sentimental Political Storytelling. New York: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
  112. Warren, Mark. 1996. Deliberative Democracy and Authority. American Political Science Review 90 (1): 46–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. ———. 2017. A Problem-Based Approach to Democratic Theory. American Political Science Review 111 (1): 39–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. Wessler, Hartmut. 2008. Investigating Deliberativeness Comparatively. Political Communication 25 (1): 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. Wessler, Hartmut, and Eike Mark Rinke. 2014. Deliberative Performance of Television News in Three Types of Democracy: Insights from the United States, Germany, and Russia. Journal of Communication 64 (5): 827–851.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. World Bank. 2001. World Development Report 2000/2001: Attacking Poverty. World Development Report. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  117. World Bank Joint Ministerial Committee. 2010. World Bank Group Reform: An Update. Washington, DC: The World Bank. http://siteresources.worldbank.org/DEVCOMMINT/Documentation/22723851/DC2010-0014(E)Reform.pdf. Accessed 22 April 2018.
  118. Wrong, Dennis. 1968. Some Problems in Defining Social Power. American Journal of Sociology 73 (6): 673–681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. Zeng, Meg Jing. 2018. From #MeToo to #RiceBunny: How Social Media Users are Campaigning in China. The Conversation, February 6. https://theconversation.com/from-metoo-to-ricebunny-how-social-media-users-are-campaigning-in-china-90860. Accessed 22 April 2018.
  120. Zhu, Yuchao. 2011. ‘Performance Legitimacy’ and China’s Political Adaptation Strategy. Journal of Chinese Political Science 16 (2): 123–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nicole Curato
    • 1
  • Marit Hammond
    • 2
  • John B. Min
    • 3
  1. 1.Centre for Deliberative Democracy and Global GovernanceUniversity of CanberraCanberraAustralia
  2. 2.School of Politics, Philosophy, International Relations and EnvironmentKeele UniversityKeeleUK
  3. 3.Department of Social Sciences – Philosophy ProgramCollege of Southern NevadaNorth Las VegasUSA

Personalised recommendations