Advertisement

Fieldwork and Emotions: Positionality, Method Choices, and a Radio Program in South Sudan

  • Kerstin Tomiak
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter offers insight into the ways in which emotions affect our present and future positionalities during fieldwork. While focus on positionality in scholarly literature tends to be on ethnicity, gender, and class, Kerstin Tomiak, conducting fieldwork in a refugee camp in South Sudan, argues it is not only these parts of a researcher’s self that have an impact. Grappling with her own reactions to the deeply emotional responses of her interviewees, Tomiak discusses the role that emotional labor played in her reactions to stories told by research participants. She concludes that experiences made in the field, and the emotions that these trigger, play an important and overlooked part in a researcher’s positionality and in turn affect method choices for research projects going forward.

Keywords

South Sudan Refugee Positionality Emotions Method choices 

References

  1. Alveson, M., & Sköldberg, K. (2009). Reflexive Methodologies. New Vistas for Qualitative Research (2nd ed.). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  2. Autesserre, S. (2014). Peaceland. Conflict Resolution and the Everyday Politics of International Intervention. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Autesserre, S. (2017). International Peacebuilding and Local Success: Assumptions and Effectiveness. International Studies Review, 19(1), 1–19.Google Scholar
  4. Bliesemann de Guevara, B., & Kostic, R. (2017). Knowledge Production In/About Conflict and Intervention: Finding “Fact”, Telling “Truth”. Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding, 11(1), 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Clarke, C., & Knights, D. (2015). Negotiating Identities: Fluidity, Diversity and Researcher Emotions. In C. Clarke, M. Broussine, & L. Watts (Eds.), Researching with Feeling: The Emotional Aspects of Social and Organizational Research (pp. 35–50). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Clément, M., & Sangar, E. (2018). Introduction: Methodological Challenges and Opportunities for the Study of Emotions. In M. Clément & E. Sangar (Eds.), Researching Emotions in International Relations: Methodological Perspectives on the Emotional Turn (pp. 1–30). Cham: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Crapanzano, V. (2010). “At the Heart of the Discipline”: Critical Reflections on Fieldwork. In J. Davies & D. Spencer (Eds.), Emotions in the Field: The Psychology and Anthropology of Fieldwork Experience (pp. 55–78). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Czarniawska, B. (2014). Social Science Research: From Field to Desk. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  9. D’Aoust, A. M. (2014). Ties That Bind? Engaging Emotions, Governmentality and Neoliberalism: Introduction to the Special Issue. Global Society, 28(3), 267–276.Google Scholar
  10. Davies, J. (2010). Introduction: Emotions in the Field. In J. Davies & D. Spencer (Eds.), Emotions in the Field: The Psychology and Anthropology of Fieldwork Experience (pp. 1–32). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Delamont, S. (2009). The Only Honest Thing: Autoethnography, Reflexivity and Small Crises in Fieldwork. Ethnography and Education, 4(1), 51–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dickson-Swift, V., James, E. L., Kippen, S., & Liamputtong, P. (2009). Researching Sensitive Topics: Qualitative Research and Emotion Work. Qualitative Research, 9(11), 61–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Finlay, L. (2002). “Outing” the Researcher: The Provenance, Process, and Practice of Reflexivity. Qualitative Health Research, 12(4), 531–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Freyberg-Inan, A. (2006). Rational Paranoia and Enlightened Machismo: The Strange Psychological Foundations of Realism. Journal of International Relations and Development, 9(3), 247–268.Google Scholar
  15. Gregory, D. (2000). Empiricism. In R. J. Johnston, D. Gregory, G. Pratt, & M. Watts (Eds.), The Dictionary of Human Geography (pp. 205–206). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.Google Scholar
  16. Hochschild, A. R. (1983). The Managed Heart: Commercialization of Human Feeling. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  17. Hutchison, E., & Bleiker, R. (2008). Emotional Reconciliation: Reconstructing Identity and Community After Trauma. European Journal of Social Theory, 11(3), 385–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hutchison, E., & Bleiker, R. (2014). Theorizing Emotions in World Politics. International Theory, 6, 491–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hutton, L. (2013). Displacement, Disharmony and Disillusion. Understanding Host-Refugee Tensions in Maban County, South Sudan. Danish Demining Group. https://reliefweb.int/report/south-sudan-republic/displacement-disharmony-and-disillusion-understanding-host-refugee. Accessed October 29, 2017.
  20. Jackson, M. (2010). From Anxiety to Method in Anthropological Fieldwork: An Appraisal of George Devereux’s Enduring Ideas. In J. Davies & D. Spencer (Eds.), Emotions in the Field: The Psychology and Anthropology of Fieldwork Experience (pp. 35–45). Redwood City, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Jackson, P. T. (2011). The Conduct of Inquiry in International Relations: Philosophy of Science and Its Implications for the Study of World Politics. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  22. James, W. (2015). Perspectives on the Blue Nile. In S. Totten & A. Grzyb (Eds.), Conflict in the Nuba Mountains: From Genocide by Attrition to the Contemporary Crisis in Sudan. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  23. Mattingly, D., & Falconer-Al-Hindi, K. (1995). Should Women Count? A Context for the Debate. Professional Geographer, 47, 27–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Nast, H. J. (1994). Opening Remarks on “Women in the Field”. Professional Geographer, 46, 54–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Nordstrom, C., & Robben, A. (Eds.). (1995). Fieldwork Under Fire: Contemporary Studies of Violence and Survival. London: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  26. Oakley, A. (1981). Interviewing Women: A Contradiction in Terms. In H. Roberts (Ed.), Doing Feminist Research. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  27. Rager, K. (2005). Compassion, Stress and the Qualitative Researcher. Qualitative Health Research, 15(3), 423–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Reger, J. (2001). Emotions, Objectivity and Voice: An Analysis of a “Failed” Participant Observation. Women’s Studies International Forum, 24(5), 605–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Schaffer, F. C. (2015). Ordinary Language Interviewing. In D. Yanow & P. Schwartz-Shea (Eds.), Interpretation and Method: Empirical Research Methods and the Interpretive Turn. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  30. Schaffer, F. C. (2016). Elucidating Social Sciences Concepts: An Interpretivist Guide. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  31. Seear, K., & McLean, K. (2008, December). Breaking the Silence: The Role of Emotional Labor in Qualitative Research. In The Australian Sociological Association (TASA) Annual Conference Proceedings. Melbourne: University of Melbourne.Google Scholar
  32. Silverman, D. (2013). Doing Qualitative Research (4th ed.). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  33. Siriam, C. L., King, J., Martin-Ortega, O., & Herman, J. (Eds.). (2009). Surviving Field Research: Working in Violent and Difficult Situations. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  34. Tiller, S., & Healy, S. (2013). Have We Lost the Ability to Respond to Refugee Crises? The Maban Response. Humanitarian Exchange, 57. Humanitarian Practice Network at ODI. http://odihpn.org/magazine/have-we-lost-the-ability-to-respond-to-refugee-crises-the-maban-response/. Accessed May 21, 2016.

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kerstin Tomiak
    • 1
  1. 1.Hebrew University of JerusalemJerusalemIsrael

Personalised recommendations