Advertisement

Engaging Young People: Consultation Skills

  • Rachel S. TattersallEmail author
Chapter
Part of the In Clinical Practice book series (ICP)

Abstract

Healthcare professionals (HCP) frequently report that communicating with adolescents and young adults (AYA) is problematic. They often attribute the difficulties to the AYA themselves, while AYA report that the responsibility to facilitate communication effectively with young people lies with the adult. Young people (YP) repeatedly express the value of engagement in their own healthcare and their struggle to ensure their voices are heard. These difficulties are multifactorial but are likely to stem from lack of training on the part of healthcare professionals, neurobiological development of young people, the development of identity/autonomy, parental style/support and the structure of healthcare consultations. This chapter reviews the factors affecting successful engagement with young people and offers suggestions for improving communication in clinical consultations.

Keywords

Communication Confidentiality Motivational interviewing Psychosocial screening 

References

  1. 1.
    White B, Viner R. Improving communication with adolescents. Arch Dis Child Pract Ed. 2012;97:93–7.  https://doi.org/10.1136/edpract-2011-300797.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bray L, Maden M, Bewley T, et al. A systematic evidence synthesis of interventions to engage children and young people in consulatations about their long term conditions. J Child Health Care. 2017;  https://doi.org/10.1177/1367493517746771.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Blakemore SJ. The social brain in adolescence. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2008;9(4):267–77.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2353.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Colver A, Longwell S. New understanding of adolescent brain development: relevance to transitional healthcare for young people with long term conditions. Arch Dis Child.  https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2013-303945.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Klein DA, Goldenring JM, Adelman WP. HEEADSSS 3.0. The psychosocial interview for adolescents updated for a new century fueled by media http://contemporarypediatrics.modernmedicine.com/contemporary-pediatrics/content/tags/adolescent-medicine/heeadsss-30-psychosocial-interview-adolesce?page=full.
  6. 6.
    Doukrou M, Segal TY. Fifteen minute consultation: communicating with young people – how to use HEEADSSS, a psychosocial interview for adolescents. Arch Dis Child Educ Pract Ed. 2017;0:1–5.  https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2016-311553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Van Staa AL. Unraveling triadic communication in hospital consultations with adolescents with chronic conditions: the added value of mixed methods research. Patient Educ Couns. 2011;82:4555–464.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2010.12.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sanci LA, Coffey CM, Veit FC, et al. Evaluation of the effectiveness of an educational intervention for general practitioners in adolescent health care: randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2000;320:224–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ford CA, Millstein SG, Halpern-Felsher BL, Irwin CE Jr. Influence of physician confidentiality assurances on adolescents’ willingness to disclose information and seek future health care. A randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 1997;278:1029–34.  https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1997.03550120089044.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gilbert AL, Rickert VI, Aalsma MC. Clinical conversations about health: the impact of confidentiality in preventive adolescent care. J Adolesc Health. 2014;55:672–7.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2014.05.016.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rubak S, Sandboaek A, Lauritzen T, et al. Motivational interviewing: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Gen Pract. 2005;55:305–12.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Schaefer MR, Kavookjian J. The impact of motivational interviewing on adherence and symptom severity in adolescents and young adults with chronic illness: a systematic review patient education and counseling. Patient Educ Couns. 2017;100:2190–9.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec2017.05.037.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sanasoni J, Grootemaat P, Duncan C. Question prompt lists in health consultations: a review. Patient Educ Couns. 98(12):1454–64.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2015.05.015, 0738-3991/.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sleath B, Carpenter DM, Davis SA, et al. Acceptance of a pre-visit intervention to engage teens in pediatric asthma visits. Patient Educ Couns. 2017;100(11):2005–11.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2017.05.013.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Whitehouse SR, Lam PY, Balka E, McLellan S, Deevska M, Penn D, Issenman R, Paone M. Co-creation with TickiT: designing and evaluating a clinical eHealth platform for youth. JMIR Res Protoc. 2013;2(2):e42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Sheffield Teaching Hospitals and Sheffield Children’s HospitalSheffieldUK
  2. 2.Department of RheumatologyRoyal Hallamshire HospitalSheffieldUK

Personalised recommendations