Advertisement

Hybridity as Fluid Identity in the Organization of Associations

  • Anna Fyrberg Yngfalk
  • Carl Yngfalk
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter addresses the issue of hybridity in non-profit organizations formally run as non-profit associations (NPA) and the case of Swedish Friskis & Svettis. It does so by examining and discussing how organizational legitimacy is managed under what is commonly referred to as “marketization”. In contradiction to previous research, we show how the hybrid position of the NPA in the market not only enacts a struggle upon the organization but also leads to a flexibility that is actively utilized in the management of organizational identity and legitimacy. In so doing, the chapter draws attention to two key organizational strategies that help to explain how Friskis & Svettis is able to utilize its hybridity in order to maintain legitimacy in the market: adaptation and activation, which creates a fluidness in which the organization is able to maintain and incorporate multiple organizational identities.

Keywords

Marketing, Marketization, Non-profit, Organizational identity, Legitimacy 

References

  1. Alvesson, M., and S. Sveningsson. 2003. Managers Doing Leadership: The Extra-Ordinarization of the Mundane. Human Relations 56: 1435–1459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Araujo, L., and J. Pels. 2015. Marketization and Its Limits. Decision 42: 451–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Balanoff, E.K. 2013. A Special, Set-Apart Place No Longer? Deconstructing the Discourse of Meaning and Mission in Nonprofit Newsletters. Administrative Theory & Praxis 35: 11–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bromley, P., and J.W. Meyer. 2015. Hyper-Organization: Global Organizational Expansion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chad, P. 2013. Implementing Market Orientation in Charities: A Necessity for Survival. Marketing Theory 13: 303–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dagens Nyheter. 2016. https://www.dn.se/ekonomi/svettig-momssmall-for-friskis-svettis/. Accessed 16 Apr 2018.
  7. Dart, R. 2004. The Legitimacy of Social Enterprise. Nonprofit Management and Leadership 14: 411–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Djelic, M.-L. 2006. Marketization: From Intellectual Agenda to Global Policy-Making. In Transnational Governance. Institutional Dynamics of Regulation, ed. M.-L. Djelic and K. Sahlin-Andersson, 53–73. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Eikenberry, A.M. 2009. Refusing the Market: A Democratic Discourse for Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 38: 582–596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Eikenberry, A.M., and J.D. Kluver. 2004. The Marketization of the Nonprofit Sector: Civil Society at Risk? Public Administration Review 64: 132–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Friskis&Svettis. 1984. The Story of Friskis & Svettis [Sagan om Friskis & Svettis]. http://www.liv-lust.se/pdf/Friskissagan.pdf. Accessed 16 Apr 2018.
  12. Friskis&Svettis.se. 2018. About Us. https://www.friskissvettis.se/Omoss. Accessed 16 Apr 2018.
  13. Hwang, H., and W.W. Powell. 2009. The Rationalization of Charity: The Influences of Professionalism in the Nonprofit Sector. Administrative Science Quarterly 54: 268–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lawrence, T.B., R. Suddaby, and B. Leca. 2009. Institutional Work: Actors and Agency in Institutional Studies of Organizations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Maier, F., M. Meyer, and M. Steinbereithner. 2016. Nonprofit Organizations Becoming Business-Like: A Systematic Review. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 45: 64–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Perkmann, M., and A. Spicer. 2008. How Are Management Fashions Institutionalized? The Role of Institutional Work. Human Relations 61: 811–844.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Powell, W.W., and P.J. DiMaggio. 2012. The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  18. Resume. 2018. https://www.resume.se/taggar/f/friskis%2D%2Dsvettis/. Accessed 16 Apr 2018.
  19. Sanders, M.L., and J.G. McClellan. 2014. Being Business-like While Pursuing a Social Mission: Acknowledging the Inherent Tensions in US Nonprofit Organizing. Organization 21: 68–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Scott, W.R. 2008. Institutions and Organizations: Ideas and Interests. Los Angeles: Sage.Google Scholar
  21. Spiggle, S. 1994. Analysis and Interpretation of Qualitative Data in Consumer Research. Journal of Consumer Research 2: 491–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. SvenskIdrott.se. 2016. Friskis&Svettis Membership Application Swedish Sports Movement. http://www.svenskidrott.se/globalassets/svenskidrottriksidrottsmotet/dokument/medlemsansokningar/friskissvettis-riks.pdf. Accessed 16 Apr 2018.
  23. Swedish Tax Authority. 2015. Statement Regarding Rentals. https://www4.skatteverket.se/rattsligvagledning/347301.html?date=2015-10-01. Accessed 16 Apr 2018.

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Service Research CenterKarlstad UniversityKarlstadSweden
  2. 2.ScoreStockholm UniversityStockholmSweden

Personalised recommendations