Having It Both Ways: Managing Contested Market Money in a Civil Society Organization
This chapter deals with the general issue of how hybridity in general and contested money in particular can be managed by hybrid organizations. The authors draw on a longitudinal case study of IOGT-NTO, a Swedish temperance association that raises most of its income through its own market-based lottery. Weighing the benefits of controlling the lottery against the legitimacy risks of being responsible for its operations (in light of risks of gambling addition), IOGT-NTO portrays the lottery as an actor, an organization of its own. However, in reality, the lottery is a department in the association. Following this strategy, the organization seeks to have it both ways.
KeywordsContestation Market money Complete organizations Civil society organizations Degrees of organization
- Alexius, S. 2014. Ansvar och marknader: vem tar ansvar för spelmarknadens baksida? Stockholm: Liber.Google Scholar
- Alexius, S., and O. Segnestam Larsson. 2016. The Social Meaning of Money: Formal and Informal Earmarking. Paper presented at the International Society of Third Sector Researchers.Google Scholar
- Billis, D., ed. 2010. Hybrid Organizations and the Third Sector. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
- Brunsson, N. 2006. Mechanisms of Hope. Copenhagen: Copenhagen Business School Press.Google Scholar