Advertisement

Sustainable Production of Biogas from Renewable Sources: Global Overview, Scale Up Opportunities and Potential Market Trends

  • Lilia E. Montañez-Hernández
  • Inty Omar Hernández-De Lira
  • Gregorio Rafael-Galindo
  • María de Lourdes Froto Madariaga
  • Nagamani Balagurusamy
Chapter

Abstract

Anaerobic Digestion (AD), which is the most prominent bioenergy technology worldwide, is a profitable alternative that provides a sustainable solution to treat organic wastes and reduce greenhouse gases emission, while producing energy in the form of methane, improving fertilizer potency and reducing pollution. The most common substrates used in AD process include animal manure and slurry, agricultural residues and their by-products, organic waste from food industries, organic fraction of municipal waste, sewage sludge, and energy crops. However, the feedstocks have different methane yield and they influence the biodigester operational behavior. Thus, many anaerobic biodigesters designs have been implemented, such as anaerobic sequencing batch reactor, continuous stirred tank reactor, anaerobic plug-flow reactor, anaerobic contact reactor, among others. Biogas produced by different sources is mainly composed by CH4, CO2, H2S, NH3 and water vapour, which have different impacts on biogas utilization. To reduce those impacts, methods of removal of undesirable components in biogas have been applied, such as condensation and absorption. Technologies for the conversion of renewable energy sources in electricity, heat and steam have undergone substantial progress over the past two decades. The total amount of electricity produced from biogas is 63.3 TWh and is estimated that the global power generation capacity will increased more than double in biogas production over the next decade, from 14.5 GW in 2012 to 29.5 GW in 2022.

Keywords

Anaerobic digestion Bioenergy Biogas Technology 

Notes

Acknowledgements

LEMH, IOHDL, MLFM and NB, authors of this chapter thank CONACyT-SENER project grant (S0019-2014-01-245113) to carry out this work. GRG thank CONACyT-PNPC for the fellowship received to do his Master’s degree in Biochemical Engineering.

References

  1. Agostini A, Battini F, Giuntoli J et al (2015) Environmentally sustainable biogas? The key role of manure co-digestion with energy crops. Energies 8:5234–5265.  https://doi.org/10.3390/en8065234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Al Seadi T, Rutz D, Prassl H et al (2008) Biogas handbook. University of Southern Denmark Esbjerg, EsbjergGoogle Scholar
  3. Al-Hamamre Z, Saidan M, Hararah M et al (2017) Wastes and biomass materials as sustainable-renewable energy resources for Jordan. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 67:295–314.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.09.035CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Alkanok G, Demirel B, Onay TT (2014) Determination of biogas generation potential as a renewable energy source from supermarket wastes. Waste Manage 34:134–140.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2013.09.015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Almeida A, Nafarrete-Rivera E, Alvarado A et al (2011) Expresión genética en la digestión anaerobia: un paso adelante en la comprensión de las interacciones tróficas de esta biotecnología. Acta Quím Mex 3:14–34Google Scholar
  6. Alvarado A, Montañez-Hernádez LE, Palacio-Molina SL et al (2014) Microbial trophic interactions and mcrA gene expression in monitoring of anaerobic digesters. Front Microbiol.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2014.00597CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Aslanzadeh S, Rajendran K, Taherzadeh MJ (2014) A comparative study between single- and two-stage anaerobic digestion processes: effects of organic loading rate and hydraulic retention time. Int Biodeterior Biodegradation 95:181–188.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibiod.2014.06.008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Awe OW, Zhao Y, Nzihou A et al (2017) A review of biogas utilisation, purification and upgrading technologies. Waste Biomass Valorization 8:267–283.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-016-9826-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bartoli A, Cavicchioli D, Kremmydas D et al (2016) The impact of different energy policy options on feedstock price and land demand for maize silage: the case of biogas in Lombardy. Energy Policy 96:351–363.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.06.018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bauer F, Persson T, Hulteberg C, Tamm D (2013) Biogas upgrading–technology overview, comparison and perspectives for the future. Biofuels Bioprod Biorefin 7:499–511CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. BP Statistical Review of World Energy, June 2017. http://www.bp.com/en/global/corporate/energy-economics/statistical-review-of-world-energy.html. Accessed 3 Sep 2017
  12. Bruun S, Jensen LS, Khanh Vu VT, Sommer S (2014) Small-scale household biogas digesters: an option for global warming mitigation or a potential climate bomb? Renew Sustain Energy Rev 33:736–741.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.02.033CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Budych-Gorzna M, Smoczynski M, Oleskowicz-Popiel P (2016) Enhancement of biogas production at the municipal wastewater treatment plant by co-digestion with poultry industry waste. Appl Energy 161:387–394.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.10.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Budzianowski WM (2016) A review of potential innovations for production, conditioning and utilization of biogas with multiple-criteria assessment. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 54:1148–1171.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.10.054CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Budzianowski WM, Budzianowska DA (2015) Economic analysis of biomethane and bioelectricity generation from biogas using different support schemes and plant configurations. Energy 88:658–666.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2015.05.104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Chaemchuen S, Zhou K, Verpoort F (2016) From biogas to biofuel: materials used for biogas cleaning to biomethane. ChemBioEng Rev 3:250–265.  https://doi.org/10.1002/cben.201600016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Chen Y, Cheng JJ, Creamer KS (2008) Inhibition of anaerobic digestion process: a review. Bioresour Technol 99:4044–4064CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Chottier C, Chatain V, Julien J et al (2014) Volatile organic silicon compounds in biogases: development of sampling and analytical methods for total silicon quantification by ICP-OES. Sci World J 2014:1–7.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/537080CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Chynoweth DP, Owens JM, Legrand R (2001) Renewable methane from anaerobic digestion of biomass. Renew Energy 22:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Collet P, Hélias A, Lardon L et al (2011) Life-cycle assessment of microalgae culture coupled to biogas production. Bioresour Technol 102:207–214.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2010.06.154CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Da Costa Gomez C (2013) 1—Biogas as an energy option: an overview. In: Wellinger A, Murphy J, Baxter D (eds) The biogas handbook. Woodhead Publishing, pp 1–16Google Scholar
  22. De Baere L (2000) Anaerobic digestion of solid waste: state-of-the-art. Water Sci Technol J Int Assoc Water Pollut Res 41:283–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Dhanalakshmi Sridevi V, Rema T, Srinivasan SV (2015) Studies on biogas production from vegetable market wastes in a two-phase anaerobic reactor. Clean Technol Environ Policy 17:1689–1697.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-014-0883-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Divya D, Gopinath LR, Merlin Christy P (2015) A review on current aspects and diverse prospects for enhancing biogas production in sustainable means. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 42:690–699.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.10.055CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. EBA Biomethane and Biogas Report (2015) European Biogas Association. http://european-biogas.eu/2015/12/16/biogasreport2015/. Accessed 3 Sep 2017
  26. Garfí M, Martí-Herrero J, Garwood A, Ferrer I (2016) Household anaerobic digesters for biogas production in Latin America: a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 60:599–614.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.01.071CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gissén C, Prade T, Kreuger E et al (2014) Comparing energy crops for biogas production—yields, energy input and costs in cultivation using digestate and mineral fertilisation. Biomass Bioenergy 64:199–210.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2014.03.061CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gupta P, Gupta A (2014) Biogas production from coal via anaerobic fermentation. Fuel 118:238–242.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2013.10.075CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hagos K, Zong J, Li D et al (2017) Anaerobic co-digestion process for biogas production: progress, challenges and perspectives. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 76:1485–1496.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hahn H, Ganagin W, Hartmann K, Wachendorf M (2014a) Cost analysis of concepts for a demand oriented biogas supply for flexible power generation. Bioresour Technol 170:211–220.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2014.07.085CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Hahn H, Krautkremer B, Hartmann K, Wachendorf M (2014b) Review of concepts for a demand-driven biogas supply for flexible power generation. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 29:383–393.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.08.085CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hamawand I (2015) Anaerobic digestion process and bio-energy in meat industry: a review and a potential. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 44:37–51.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.12.009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hengeveld EJ, Bekkering J, van Gemert WJT, Broekhuis AA (2016) Biogas infrastructures from farm to regional scale, prospects of biogas transport grids. Biomass Bioenergy 86:43–52.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2016.01.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ho K-L, Lin W-C, Chung Y-C et al (2013) Elimination of high concentration hydrogen sulfide and biogas purification by chemical–biological process. Chemosphere 92:1396–1401.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.05.054CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Höök M, Tang X (2013) Depletion of fossil fuels and anthropogenic climate change—a review. Energy Policy 52:797–809.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.10.046CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Huacuz JM (2007) Renewable energy in Mexico: current status and future prospects. Towards a cleaner planet. Springer, Berlin, pp 247–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Jeison D, Chamy R (1999) Comparison of the behaviour of expanded granular sludge bed (EGSB) and upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactors in dilute and concentrated wastewater treatment. Water Sci Technol 40:91–97.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0273-1223(99)00613-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Jha P, Schmidt S (2017) Reappraisal of chemical interference in anaerobic digestion processes. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 75:954–971.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.076CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kabir MM, Forgács G, Sárvári Horváth I (2015) Biogas from lignocellulosic materials. In: Karimi K (ed) Lignocellulose-based bioproducts. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 207–251Google Scholar
  40. Kadam R, Panwar NL (2017) Recent advancement in biogas enrichment and its applications. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 73:892–903.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.01.167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Kim D-H, Cha J, Lee M-K et al (2013) Prediction of bio-methane potential and two-stage anaerobic digestion of starfish. Bioresour Technol 141:184–190.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2013.02.065CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Korres N, O’Kiely P, Benzie JAH, West JS (2013) Bioenergy production by anaerobic digestion: using agricultural biomass and organic wastes. RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
  43. Kusch S, Schäfer W, Kranert M (2011) Dry digestion of organic residues. In: Integrated waste management, vol I. InTechGoogle Scholar
  44. Lauer M, Dotzauer M, Hennig C et al (2017) Flexible power generation scenarios for biogas plants operated in Germany: impacts on economic viability and GHG emissions. Int J Energy Res 41:63–80.  https://doi.org/10.1002/er.3592CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Lemmer A, Krümpel J (2017) Demand-driven biogas production in anaerobic filters. Appl Energy 185:885–894.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.10.073CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Li Y, Park SY, Zhu J (2011) Solid-state anaerobic digestion for methane production from organic waste. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 15:821–826.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2010.07.042CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Lijó L, González-García S, Bacenetti J, Moreira MT (2017) The environmental effect of substituting energy crops for food waste as feedstock for biogas production. Energy.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.04.137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Lindner J, Zielonka S, Oechsner H, Lemmer A (2016) Is the continuous two-stage anaerobic digestion process well suited for all substrates? Bioresour Technol 200:470–476.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2015.10.052CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Lisboa MS, Lansing S (2013) Characterizing food waste substrates for co-digestion through biochemical methane potential (BMP) experiments. Waste Manage 33:2664–2669.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2013.09.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. NOM-001-SECRE-2010. Specifications of natural gas. Published in the Official Diary of the Federation in February 25th 2010. http://dof.gob.mx/nota_detalle.php?codigo=5135962&fecha=19/03/2010. Accessed 3 Sep 2017
  51. Mao C, Feng Y, Wang X, Ren G (2015) Review on research achievements of biogas from anaerobic digestion. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 45:540–555.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.02.032CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Massanet-Nicolau J, Dinsdale R, Guwy A, Shipley G (2015) Utilising biohydrogen to increase methane production, energy yields and process efficiency via two stage anaerobic digestion of grass. Bioresour Technol 189:379–383.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2015.03.116CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Mauky E, Jacobi HF, Liebetrau J, Nelles M (2015) Flexible biogas production for demand-driven energy supply—feeding strategies and types of substrates. Bioresour Technol 178:262–269.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2014.08.123CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Meneses-Reyes JC, Hernández-Eugenio G, Huber DH et al (2017) Biochemical methane potential of oil-extracted microalgae and glycerol in co-digestion with chicken litter. Bioresour Technol 224:373–379.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2016.11.012CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Montgomery LF, Bochmann G (2014) Pretreatment of feedstock for enhanced biogas production. IEA Bioenergy 1–20Google Scholar
  56. Mumme J, Linke B, Tölle R (2010) Novel upflow anaerobic solid-state (UASS) reactor. Bioresour Technol 101:592–599.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2009.08.073CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Nayal FS, Mammadov A, Ciliz N (2016) Environmental assessment of energy generation from agricultural and farm waste through anaerobic digestion. J Environ Manage 184:389–399.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.09.058CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Neshat SA, Mohammadi M, Najafpour GD, Lahijani P (2017) Anaerobic co-digestion of animal manures and lignocellulosic residues as a potent approach for sustainable biogas production. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 79:308–322.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Ohannessian A, Desjardin V, Chatain V, Germain P (2008) Volatile organic silicon compounds: the most undesirable contaminants in biogases. Water Sci Technol 58:1775.  https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2008.498CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Pagés-Díaz J, Sárvári-Horváth I, Pérez-Olmo J, Pereda-Reyes I (2013) Co-digestion of bovine slaughterhouse wastes, cow manure, various crops and municipal solid waste at thermophilic conditions: a comparison with specific case running at mesophilic conditions. Water Sci Technol 67:989–995.  https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2013.647CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Paolini V, Petracchini F, Guerriero E et al (2016) Biogas cleaning and upgrading with natural zeolites from tuffs. Environ Technol 37:1418–1427.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09593330.2015.1118557CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Petersson A, Wellinger A (2009) Biogas upgrading technologies–developments and innovations. IEA Bioenergy 20:1–19Google Scholar
  63. Poh PE, Tan DT, Chan E-S, Tey BT (2015) Current advances of biogas production via anaerobic digestion of industrial wastewater. In: Ravindra P (ed) Advances in bioprocess technology. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 149–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Pohl M, Mumme J, Heeg K, Nettmann E (2012) Thermo- and mesophilic anaerobic digestion of wheat straw by the upflow anaerobic solid-state (UASS) process. Bioresour Technol 124:321–327.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2012.08.063CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Pohl M, Heeg K, Mumme J (2013) Anaerobic digestion of wheat straw—performance of continuous solid-state digestion. Bioresour Technol 146:408–415.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2013.07.101CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Pohland FG, Ghosh S (1971) Developments in anaerobic stabilization of organic wastes–the two-phase concept. Environ Lett 1:255–266.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00139307109434990CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Pöschl M, Ward S, Owende P (2010) Evaluation of energy efficiency of various biogas production and utilization pathways. Appl Energy 87:3305–3321.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2010.05.011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Prasad PVV, Thomas JMG, Narayanan S (2017) Global warming effects. In: Encyclopedia of applied plant sciences. Elsevier, pp 289–299Google Scholar
  69. Rapport J, Tiangco V, Urgun-Demirtas M et al (2016) Field-scale demonstration of a new in situ biogas upgrading process to produce renewable methane from food waste. Proc Water Environ Fed 2016:5607–5613.  https://doi.org/10.2175/193864716819707012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Renewable capacity statistics (2017) International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA), Abu DhabiGoogle Scholar
  71. Renewables 2017: Global Status Report (2017) Canadian Electronic Library (Firm)Google Scholar
  72. Riva M, Campestrini M, Toubassy J et al (2014) Solid–liquid–vapor equilibrium models for cryogenic biogas upgrading. Ind Eng Chem Res 53:17506–17514.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ie502957xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Ruffino B, Zanetti M (2017) Present and future solutions of waste management in a candied fruit—jam factory: optimized anaerobic digestion for on site energy production. J Clean Prod 159:26–37.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.05.048CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Ryckebosch E, Drouillon M, Vervaeren H (2011) Techniques for transformation of biogas to biomethane. Biomass Bioenergy 35:1633–1645.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2011.02.033CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Sanna A (2014) Advanced biofuels from thermochemical processing of sustainable biomass in Europe. BioEnergy Res 7:36–47.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-013-9378-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Schievano A, D’Imporzano G, Adani F (2009) Substituting energy crops with organic wastes and agro-industrial residues for biogas production. J Environ Manage 90:2537–2541.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.01.013CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. Schievano A, Tenca A, Lonati S et al (2014) Can two-stage instead of one-stage anaerobic digestion really increase energy recovery from biomass? Appl Energy 124:335–342.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.03.024CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Scholz M, Melin T, Wessling M (2013) Transforming biogas into biomethane using membrane technology. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 17:199–212.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2012.08.009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Sgroi F, Foderà M, Trapani AMD et al (2015) Economic evaluation of biogas plant size utilizing giant reed. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 49:403–409.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.04.142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Sialve B, Bernet N, Bernard O (2009) Anaerobic digestion of microalgae as a necessary step to make microalgal biodiesel sustainable. Biotechnol Adv 27:409–416.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2009.03.001CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. Singhal S, Agarwal S, Arora S et al (2017) Upgrading techniques for transformation of biogas to bio-CNG: a review: a review on upgradation techniques to transform biogas to bio-CNG. Int J Energy Res.  https://doi.org/10.1002/er.3719CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Steffen R, Szolar O, Braun R (1998) Feedstocks for anaerobic digestionGoogle Scholar
  83. Strevett KA, Vieth RF, Grasso D (1995) Chemo-autotrophic biogas purification for methane enrichment: mechanism and kinetics. Chem Eng J Biochem Eng J 58:71–79.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0923-0467(95)06095-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Sun Q, Li H, Yan J et al (2015) Selection of appropriate biogas upgrading technology-a review of biogas cleaning, upgrading and utilisation. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 51:521–532.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.06.029CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Sun C, Cao W, Banks CJ et al (2016) Biogas production from undiluted chicken manure and maize silage: a study of ammonia inhibition in high solids anaerobic digestion. Bioresour Technol 218:1215–1223.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2016.07.082CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  86. Surendra KC, Takara D, Hashimoto AG, Khanal SK (2014) Biogas as a sustainable energy source for developing countries: opportunities and challenges. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 31:846–859.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.12.015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Svenskt gastekniskt center (2012) Basic data on biogas. Svenskt gastekniskt center, MalmöGoogle Scholar
  88. Tafarte P, Hennig C, Dotzauer M, Thrän D (2017) Impact of flexible bioenergy provision on residual load fluctuation: a case study for the TransnetBW transmission system in 2022. Energy Sustain Soc.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s13705-017-0108-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Tasnim F, Iqbal SA, Chowdhury AR (2017) Biogas production from anaerobic co-digestion of cow manure with kitchen waste and Water Hyacinth. Renew Energy 109:434–439.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2017.03.044CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Thomas P, Soren N, Rumjit NP et al (2017) Biomass resources and potential of anaerobic digestion in Indian scenario. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 77:718–730.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.04.053CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Van der Ploeg F, Rezai A (2017) Cumulative emissions, unburnable fossil fuel, and the optimal carbon tax. Technol Forecast Soc Change 116:216–222.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.10.016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Wang X, Nordlander E, Thorin E, Yan J (2013) Microalgal biomethane production integrated with an existing biogas plant: a case study in Sweden. Appl Energy 112:478–484.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.04.087CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Wang J, Feng L, Tang X et al (2017) The implications of fossil fuel supply constraints on climate change projections: a supply-side analysis. Futures 86:58–72.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2016.04.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Ward AJ, Hobbs PJ, Holliman PJ, Jones DL (2008) Optimisation of the anaerobic digestion of agricultural resources. Bioresour Technol 99:7928–7940.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2008.02.044CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  95. Ward AJ, Lewis DM, Green FB (2014) Anaerobic digestion of algae biomass: a review. Algal Res 5:204–214.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.algal.2014.02.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Ware A, Power N (2016) Biogas from cattle slaughterhouse waste: energy recovery towards an energy self-sufficient industry in Ireland. Renew Energy 97:541–549.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2016.05.068CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Weiland P (2010) Biogas production: current state and perspectives. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 85:849–860.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-009-2246-7CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  98. Whiting A, Azapagic A (2014) Life cycle environmental impacts of generating electricity and heat from biogas produced by anaerobic digestion. Energy 70:181–193.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2014.03.103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Williams PJ le B, Laurens LML (2010) Microalgae as biodiesel & biomass feedstocks: review & analysis of the biochemistry, energetics & economics. Energy Environ Sci 3:554.  https://doi.org/10.1039/b924978h
  100. Yang L, Ge X, Wan C et al (2014) Progress and perspectives in converting biogas to transportation fuels. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 40:1133–1152.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.08.008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Yentekakis IV, Goula G (2017) Biogas management: advanced utilization for production of renewable energy and added-value chemicals. Front Environ Sci.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2017.00007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Zheng Y, Zhao J, Xu F, Li Y (2014) Pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass for enhanced biogas production. Prog Energy Combust Sci 42:35–53.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecs.2014.01.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Zhu L (2014) The combined production of ethanol and biogas from microalgal residuals to sustain microalgal biodiesel: a theoretical evaluation. Biofuels Bioprod Biorefin 8:7–15.  https://doi.org/10.1002/bbb.1442CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lilia E. Montañez-Hernández
    • 1
  • Inty Omar Hernández-De Lira
    • 1
  • Gregorio Rafael-Galindo
    • 1
  • María de Lourdes Froto Madariaga
    • 1
  • Nagamani Balagurusamy
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratorio de Biorremediación, Facultad de Ciencias BiológicasUniversidad Autónoma de CoahuilaTorreónMexico

Personalised recommendations