Advertisement

Mastectomy

  • Hisham Fansa
  • Christoph Heitmann
Chapter

Abstract

Mastectomy has become less invasive. The radical mastectomy published by William Halsted in1894 included resection of skin, gland, the pectoral muscles and axillary lymph nodes en bloc. This approach was partially due to the late and extensive stages of the disease. Nowadays most mastectomies are performed as nipple-sparing mastectomies (NSM), leaving the skin and the nipple intact. It was shown that the risk for recurrence is not much increased in the right indications. Skin- and nipple-sparing mastectomies (SSM and NSM) have shifted the paradigm in breast reconstruction. Leaving the skin intact requires a primary reconstruction and involves the plastic surgeon early in the surgical and oncological concept.

Literature

  1. 1.
    Bostwick J. Prophylactic (risk-reducing) mastectomy and reconstruction. In: Plastic and reconstructive breast surgery, vol. II. St. Louis: Quality Medical Publishing; 1990. p. 1369–73.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Colwell AS, Tessler O, Lin AM, Liao E, Winograd J, Cetrulo CL, Tang R, Smith BL, Austen WG Jr. Breast reconstruction following nipple-sparing mastectomy: predictors of complications, reconstruction outcomes, and 5-year trends. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014;133:496–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Colwell AS, Christensen JM. Nipple-sparing mastectomy and direct-to-implant breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017;140(5S Advances in Breast Reconstruction):44S–50S.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Colwell AS, Taylor E, Specht M, Orringer JS. Optimizing nipple position following nipple-sparing mastectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2017;5:e1490.  https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000001490.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Headon HL, Kasem A, Mokbel K. The oncological safety of nipple-sparing mastectomy: a systematic review of the literature with a pooled analysis of 12,358 procedures. Arch Plast Surg. 2016;43:328–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jakub JW, Peled AW, Gray RJ, Greenup RA, Kiluk JV, Sacchini V, McLaughlin SA, Tchou JC, Vierkant RA, Degnim AC, Willey S. Oncologic safety of prophylactic nipple-sparing mastectomy in a population with BRCA mutations: a multi-institutional study. JAMA Surg. 2017:123.  https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2017.3422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ladizinsky DA, Sandholm PH, Jewett ST, Shahzad F, Andrews K. Breast reconstruction with the Bostwick autoderm technique. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;132:261–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Manning AT, Wood C, Eaton A, Stempel M, Capko D, Pusic A, Morrow M, Sacchini V. Nipple-sparing mastectomy in patients with BRCA1/2 mutations and variants of uncertain significance. Br J Surg. 2015;102:1354–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Marta GN, Poortmans P, de Barros AC, Filassi JR, Freitas Junior R, Audisio RA, Mano MS, Meterissian S, DeSnyder SM, Buchholz TA, Hijal T. Multidisciplinary international survey of post-operative radiation therapy practices after nipple-sparing or skin-sparing mastectomy. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2017;S0748-7983(17):30704–7.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Meijers-Heijboer H, van Geel B, van Putten WLJ, Henzen-Logmans SC, Seynaeve C, Menke-Pluymers MBE, Bartels CCM, Verhoog LC, van den Ouweland AMW, Niermeijer MF, Brekelmans CTM, Klijn JGM. Breast cancer after prophylactic bilateral mastectomy in women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. N Engl J Med. 2001;345:159–64. 2001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mota BS, Riera R, Ricci MD, Barrett J, de Castria TB, Atallah ÁN, Bevilacqua JLB. Nipple- and areola-sparing mastectomy for the treatment of breast cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016;11. Art. No.: CD008932.  https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD008932.pub3.
  12. 12.
    Smith BL, Tang R, Rai U, Plichta JK, Colwell AS, Gadd MA, Specht MC, Austen WG Jr, Coopey SB. Oncologic safety of nipple-sparing mastectomy in women with breast cancer. J Am Coll Surg. 2017;S1072-7515(17):30595–1.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2017.06.013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    van Verschuer VM, Mureau MA, Gopie JP, Vos EL, Verhoef C, Menke-Pluijmers MB, Koppert LB. Patient satisfaction and nipple-areola sensitivity after bilateral prophylactic mastectomy and immediate implant breast reconstruction in a high breast cancer risk population: nipple-sparing mastectomy versus skin-sparing mastectomy. Ann Plast Surg. 2016;77:145–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hisham Fansa
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Christoph Heitmann
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic SurgeryKlinikum BielefeldGermany
  2. 2.Center for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery and Reconstructive Breast SurgeryMunichGermany
  3. 3.Center for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery and Reconstructive Breast SurgeryZurichSwitzerland
  4. 4.Practice for Plastic SurgeryMunichGermany

Personalised recommendations