Advertisement

Autologous Reconstruction: Pedicled Flaps

  • Hisham Fansa
  • Christoph Heitmann
Chapter

Abstract

The latissimus dorsi muscle runs from the thoracolumbar fascia of the lumbar and lower thoracic spine directly under the skin to its base on the upper arm (crista tuberculi minoris). The latissimus dorsi flap, first described by Tansini in 1906, quickly became the standard flap after its rediscovery by Olivari in 1976 due to its very constant anatomy. It can be used as a free flap or as a pedicled flap. In breast surgery it is used almost exclusively pedicled. Even today, the pedicled latissimus is a good procedure if free flaps are not indicated or have failed. The latissimus is an internal rotator and adductor in the shoulder. If the shoulder is intact and the remaining muscles are present, muscle harvesting is usually well tolerated.

Literature

Latissimus Dorsi Flap

  1.  1.
    Hamdi M, Van Landuyt K, Hijjawi JB, Roche N, Blondeel P, Monstrey S. Surgical technique in pedicled thoracodorsal artery perforator flaps: a clinical experience with 99 patients. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;121:1632–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2.  2.
    Heitmann C, Pelzer M, Kuentscher M, Menke H, Germann G. The extended latissimus dorsi flap revisited. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003a;111:1697–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3.  3.
    Heitmann C, Guerra A, Metzinger SW, Levin LS, Allen RJ. The thoracodorsal artery perforator flap: anatomic basis and clinical application. Ann Plast Surg. 2003b;51:23–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4.  4.
    Olivari N. The latissimus flap. Br J Plast Surg. 1976;29:126–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pedicled Transverse und Vertical Rectus Abdominis Muscle-Flap (TRAM/VRAM-Flap)

  1.  5.
    Fansa H, Schirmer S, Frerichs O, Gehl HB. Significance of abdominal wall CT-angiography in planning DIEA perforator flaps, TRAM flaps and SIEA flaps. Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir. 2011;43:81–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2.  6.
    Knox AD, Ho AL, Leung L, Tashakkor AY, Lennox PA, Van Laeken N, Macadam SA. Comparison of outcomes following autologous breast reconstruction using the DIEP and pedicled TRAM flaps: a 12-year clinical retrospective study and literature review. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016;138:16–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3.  7.
    Levine SM, Patel N, Disa JJ. Outcomes of delayed abdominal-based autologous reconstruction versus latissimus dorsi flap plus implant reconstruction in previously irradiated patients. Ann Plast Surg. 2012;69:380–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4.  8.
    Macadam SA, Zhong T, Weichman K, Papsdorf M, Lennox PA, Hazen A, Matros E, Disa J, Mehrara B, Pusic AL. Quality of life and patient-reported outcomes in breast cancer survivors: a multicenter comparison of four abdominally based autologous reconstruction methods. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016;137:758–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5.  9.
    Spear SL, Ducic I, Cuoco F, Hannan C. The effect of smoking on flap and donor-site complications in pedicled TRAM Breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005;116:1873–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 10.
    Wu C, Clayton JL, Halvorson EG. Racial differences in ischemic complications of pedicled versus free abdominal flaps for Breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 2014;72:S172–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hisham Fansa
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Christoph Heitmann
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic SurgeryKlinikum BielefeldGermany
  2. 2.Center for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery and Reconstructive Breast SurgeryMunichGermany
  3. 3.Center for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery and Reconstructive Breast SurgeryZurichSwitzerland
  4. 4.Practice for Plastic SurgeryMunichGermany

Personalised recommendations