Advertisement

Big Data in Computational Social Sciences and Humanities: An Introduction

  • Shu-Heng Chen
  • Tina Yu
Chapter
Part of the Computational Social Sciences book series (CSS)

Abstract

This chapter provides an overview of the current development of big data in the computational social sciences and humanities. It is composed of two parts. In the first part, we review works incorporating the three most frequently seen types of big data, namely geographic data, text corpus data, and social media data, that are used to conduct research on the social sciences in a wide range of fields, including anthropology, economics, finance, geography, history, linguistics, political science, psychology, public health, and mass communications. The second part of the chapter provides a panoramic view of the development of big data in the computational social sciences and humanities, including recent trends and the evoked challenges. As for the former, we review four representative cases of its timely development. They are big data finance, big data in psychology, the spatial humanities, and cloud computing. As for the latter, we present an overview of four challenges associated with big data, namely the complexity of big data or the ontology and epistemology of big data, big data search, big data simulation, and big data risk.

Keywords

Big data Computational social science Computational humanities Citizen science Geographic information system Corpus linguistics Narrative economics Sentiment analysis Multiplex networks Spatial humanities Computational history 

References

  1. Azmak, O., Bayer, H., Caplin, A., Chun, M., Glimcher, P., Koonin, S., & Patrinos, A. (2015). Using Big data to understand the human condition: The Kavli HUMAN project. Big Data, 3(3), 173–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bauerlein, M. (2008). The dumbest generation: How the digital age stupefies young Americans and jeopardizes our future (or, don’t trust anyone under 30). London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  3. Biemann, C., Crane, G. R., Fellbaum, C. D., & Mehler, A. (2014). Computational humanities-bridging the gap between computer science and digital humanities (Dagstuhl Seminar 14301). In Dagstuhl reports (Vol. 4, No. 7). Dagstuhl: Schloss Dagstuhl-Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik.Google Scholar
  4. Bodenhamer, D. J., Corrigan, J., & Harris, T. M. (Eds.). (2010). The spatial humanities: GIS and the future of humanities scholarship. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Cambria, E., Das, D., Bandyopadhyay, S., & Feraco, A. (Eds.). (2017). A practical guide to sentiment analysis (Vol. 5). Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
  6. Ceron, A., Curini, L., & Iacus, S. M. (2016). Politics and Big data: Nowcasting and forecasting elections with social media. Didcot: Taylor & Francis.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chen, S.-H. (2008). Financial applications: Stock markets. In B. Wang (Ed.), Wiley encyclopedia of computer science and engineering (pp. 1227–1244). Hoboken: Wiley.Google Scholar
  8. Chen, S.-H. (2013). Reasoning-based artificial agents in agent-based computational economics. In K. Nakamatsu & L. Jain (Eds.), The handbook on reasoning-based intelligent systems (pp. 575–602). Singapore: World Scientific.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chen, S.-H., & Venkatachalam, R. (2017). Agent-based modelling as a foundation for big data. Journal of Economic Methodology, 24(4), 362–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chen, S. H., Kaboudan, M., & Du, Y. R. (2018). Computational economics in the era of natural computationalism. In S. H. Chen, M. Kaboudan, & Y. R. Du (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of computational economics and finance. New York: Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chen, S.-H., Kampouridis, M., & Tsang, E. (2010). Microstructure dynamics and agent-based financial markets. In International workshop on multi-agent systems and agent-based simulation (pp. 121–135). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  12. Cheung, M. W. L., & Jak, S. (2016). Analyzing big data in psychology: A split/analyze/meta-analyze approach. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 738  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00738.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Clark, A. E., Flèche, S., Layard, R., Powdthavee, N., & Ward, G. (2018). The origins of happiness: The science of Well-being over the life course. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Conover, M. D., Ferrara, E., Menczer, F., & Flammini, A. (2013). The digital evolution of occupy Wall Street. PLoS One, 8(5), e64679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Conroy, N. J., Rubin, V. L., & Chen, Y. (2015). Automatic deception detection: Methods for finding fake news. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 52(1), 1–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cooper, C. (2017). Citizen science: How ordinary people are changing the face of discovery. London: Gerald Duckworth & Co.Google Scholar
  17. Cruz-Neira, C. (2003). Computational humanities: The new challenge for VR. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 23(3), 10–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Franzoni, C., & Sauermann, H. (2014). Crowd science: The organization of scientific research in open collaborative projects. Research Policy, 43(1), 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gavin, M. (2014). Agent-based modeling and historical simulation. DHQ: Digital Humanities Quarterly, 8(4). Retrieved January 12, 2015, from http://www.digitalhumanities.org/dhq/vol/8/4/000195/000195.html
  20. Hansen, S., McMahon, M., & Prat, A. (2018). Transparency and deliberation within the FOMC: A computational linguistics approach. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1, 70.  https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjx045.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Harlow, L. L., & Oswald, F. L. (2016). Big data in psychology: Introduction to the special issue. Psychological Methods, 21(4), 447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Helbing, D., Frey, B. S., Gigerenzer, G., Hafen, E., Hagner, M., Hofstetter, Y., et al. (2017). Will democracy survive big data and artificial intelligence? Scientific American, 25. Retrieved February 27, 2017, from https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/will-democracy-survive-big-data-and-artificial-intelligence/ (accessed 27 Feb, 2017)
  23. Jones, M. N. (Ed.). (2016). Big data in cognitive science. Hove: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  24. Joshi, A., Mishra, A., Senthamilselvan, N., & Bhattacharyya, P. (2014). Measuring sentiment annotation complexity of text. In Proceedings of the 52nd annual meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (volume 2: Short papers) (Vol. 2, pp. 36–41).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1972). Subjective probability: A judgment of representativeness. Cognitive Psychology, 3(3), 430–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kleiner, B., Stam, A., & Pekari, A. (2015). Big data for the social sciences (FORS Working Papers, 2015-2).Google Scholar
  27. Lane, J., Stodden, V., Bender, S., & Nissenbaum, H. (Eds.). (2014). Privacy, big data, and the public good: Frameworks for engagement. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Liu, B. (2015). Sentiment analysis: Mining opinions, sentiments, and emotions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Loader, B. D., Vromen, A., Xenos, M. A., Steel, H., & Burgum, S. (2015). Campus politics, student societies and social media. The Sociological Review, 63(4), 820–839.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lo, A. W. (2004). The adaptive markets hypothesis: Market efficiency from an evolutionary perspective. Journal of Portfolio Management, 30, 15–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. McCloskey, D. N. (1983). The rhetoric of economics. Journal of Economic Literature, 21(2), 481–517.Google Scholar
  32. McCloskey, D. N. (1998). The rhetoric of economics. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
  33. Mitra, G., & Xiang, Y. (2016). Handbook of sentiment analysis in finance. New York: Albury Books.Google Scholar
  34. Morson, G. S., & Schapiro, M. (2017). Cents and sensibility: What economics can learn from the humanities. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Morzy, M., Kajdanowicz, T., & Kazienko, P. (2017). On measuring the complexity of networks: Kolmogorov complexity versus entropy. Complexity, 2017, 3250301.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. O’Neil, C. (2017). Weapons of math destruction: How big data increases inequality and threatens democracy. New York: Broadway Books.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  37. Peters, B. (2012). The big data gold rush. New York: Forbes Magazine.Google Scholar
  38. Peterson, R. L. (2016). Trading on sentiment: The power of minds over markets. Hoboken: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Pinheiro, F. L., Santos, M. D., Santos, F. C., & Pacheco, J. M. (2014). Origin of peer influence in social networks. Physical Review Letters, 112(9), 098702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Pozzi, F. A., Fersini, E., Messina, E., & Liu, B. (2016). Sentiment analysis in social networks. Burlington: Morgan Kaufmann.Google Scholar
  41. Rossbach, S. (1983). Feng Shui, the Chinese art of placement. New York: EP Dutton. Inc.Google Scholar
  42. Roy, D., & Zeckhauser, R. (2016). Literary light on decision’s dark corner. In R. Frantz, S. H. Chen, K. Dopfer, F. Heukelom, & S. Mousavi (Eds.), Routledge handbook of behavioral economics (pp. 230–249). Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  43. Savage, M., & Burrows, R. (2007). The coming crisis of empirical sociology. Sociology, 41(5), 885–899.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Seligman, M. E. (2004). Authentic happiness: Using the new positive psychology to realize your potential for lasting fulfillment. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  45. Shiller, R. J. (2017). Narrative economics. American Economic Review, 107(4), 967–1004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Soja, E. (2001). In different spaces: Interpreting the spatial organization of societies. In Proceedings, 3rd international space syntax symposium (p. 1-s1).Google Scholar
  47. Soros, G. (2013). Fallibility, reflexivity, and the human uncertainty principle. Journal of Economic Methodology, 20(4), 309–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Stephens-Davidowitz, S., & Pabon, A. (2017). Everybody lies: Big data, new data, and what the internet can tell us about who we really are. New York: HarperLuxe.Google Scholar
  49. Sunstein, C. R. (2008). Neither Hayek nor Habermas. Public Choice, 134(1–2), 87–95.Google Scholar
  50. Thompson, A. (2016). Journalists and Trump voters live in separate online bubbles, MIT analysis shows. New York: Vice News.Google Scholar
  51. Vaillant, G. E. (2008). Aging well: Surprising guideposts to a happier life from the landmark study of adult development. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
  52. Webster, R. (2012). Feng Shui for beginners: Successful living by design. Woodbury: Llewellyn Worldwide.Google Scholar
  53. WHO-CBD. (2015). Connecting global priorities: biodiversity and human health: a state of knowledge review, p. 344.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shu-Heng Chen
    • 1
  • Tina Yu
    • 1
  1. 1.AI-ECON Research Center, Department of EconomicsNational Chengchi UniversityTaipeiTaiwan

Personalised recommendations