Human Rights for ‘Hard Cases’: Alternatives to Imprisonment for Serious Offending by Children and Youth
It is almost ubiquitous to have separate and specialized systems for children and youth in conflict with the law, but in even the most progressive of jurisdictions, children and youth convicted of serious violent offences such as homicide may be imprisoned. This chapter analyses the use of imprisonment in adult facilities against young offenders, particularly the imposition of the sentence of life imprisonment, through the lens of international standards for youth justice. This issue has received little attention in the literature, posing as it does conceptual challenges to norms of youth justice, such as best interests, and involving the balancing with interests such as public safety. There is a particular focus on New Zealand, but the analysis will have wider application.
KeywordsYouth justice Children’s rights Imprisonment International standards
- Allen, F. A. (1981). The Decline of the Rehabilitative Ideal: Penal Policy and Social Purpose. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
- Applegate, B. K., & Davis, R. K. (2006). Public views on sentencing juvenile murderers: The impact of offender, offense, and perceived maturity? Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 4(1), 55–74.Google Scholar
- Baird, M. I., & Samuels, M. B. (1996). Youth, family and the law: Defining rights and establishing recognition. Journal of Law & Policy, 5, 177–189.Google Scholar
- Barretto, C., Miers, S., & Lambie, I. (2016). The views of the public on youth offenders and the New Zealand criminal justice system. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology. [Online]. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X16644500. Accessed February 9, 2018.
- Bell, S. A., & Brookbanks, W. J. (2005). Mental Health Law in New Zealand. Wellington: Brookers.Google Scholar
- Cavadino, P. (Ed.). (1996). Children Who Kill: An Examination of the Treatment of Juveniles Who Kill in Different European Countries. Winchester: Waterside Press.Google Scholar
- Child Rights International Network [CRIN]. (2015). Inhuman Sentencing: Life Imprisonment of Children Around the World—Research Report. [Online]. Available https://www.crin.org/sites/default/files/life_imprisonment_children_global_0.pdf. Accessed February 7, 2018.
- Council of Europe. (2010). Guidelines of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe on Child Friendly Justice: Adopted by the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe on 17 November 2010. Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing.Google Scholar
- Cuncannan, J. (1997). Only when they’re bad: The rights and responsibilities of our children. Washington University Journal of Urban & Contemporary Law, 51, 273–301.Google Scholar
- Defence for Children International. (2003). Kids Behind Bars: A Study on Children in Conflict with the Law: Towards Investing in Prevention, Stopping Incarceration and Meeting International Standards. [Online]. Available http://www.kidsbehindbars.org/english/docs/RapportKBBtotaal.pdf. Accessed February 7, 2018.
- Department of Corrections. (2007). About Time: Turning People Away from a Life of Crime and Reducing Re-offending. Wellington: New Zealand Department of Corrections.Google Scholar
- Department of Corrections. (2017a). Official information request.Google Scholar
- Department of Corrections. (2017b). Prison Facts and Statistics—September 2017. [Online]. Available http://www.corrections.govt.nz/resources/research_and_statistics/quarterly_prison_statistics/prison_stats_september_2017.html. Accessed February 7, 2018.
- Department of Corrections. (2017c). Prison Operations Manual. [Online]. Available http://www.corrections.govt.nz/__data/assets/pdf_file/0008/627065/Prisoner-Guide-to-POM-050717.pdf. Accessed February 7, 2018.
- Feld, B. C. (2012). Adolescent criminal responsibility, proportionality, and sentencing policy: Roper, Graham, Miller/Jackson, and the youth discount. Law & Inequality, 31, 263–330.Google Scholar
- Fionda, J. (Ed.). (2001). Legal Concepts of Childhood. Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
- Goldingay, S. (2012). “Without fists”: Age mixing and its influence on safety and criminal contamination in women’s prisons. Youth Studies Australia, 31, 17–25.Google Scholar
- Goldson, B. (2002). New punitiveness: The politics of child incarceration. In J. Muncie, G. Hughes, & E. McLaughlin (Eds.), Youth Justice: Critical Readings (pp. 386–400). London: Sage.Google Scholar
- Goldson, B., & Muncie, J. (2012). Towards a global ‘child friendly’ juvenile justice? International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice, 40(1), 47–64.Google Scholar
- Graham, P. (2011). So Brilliantly Clever: Parker, Hulme & the Murder that Shocked the World. Wellington: Awa Press.Google Scholar
- Green, D. A. (2012). When Children Kill Children: Penal Populism and Political Culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Guggenheim, M. (2005). How children’s lawyers serve state interests. Nevada Law Journal, 6(3), 805–835.Google Scholar
- Jackson, M. (1988). The Māori and the Criminal Justice System: He Whaipaanga Hou—A New Perspective. Wellington: New Zealand Department of Justice Policy and Research Division.Google Scholar
- Kilkelly, U., Moore, L., & Convery, U. (2002). In Our Care: Promoting the Rights of Children in Custody. Belfast: Northern Ireland Human Rights Commission.Google Scholar
- Levick, M. L., & Schwartz, R. G. (2012). Practical implications of Miller v. Jackson: Obtaining relief in court and before the parole board. Law & Inequality, 31(2), 369–409.Google Scholar
- Lynch, N. (2010). Changes to youth justice. New Zealand Law Journal, 129–130.Google Scholar
- Lynch, N. (2016a). Youth Justice in New Zealand (2nd ed.). Wellington: Thomson Reuters.Google Scholar
- Lynch, N. (2016b). Case note: The sentencing of the vulnerable: P v R. Te Wharenga. The New Zealand Criminal Law Review, 61, 103–109.Google Scholar
- Lynch, N. (2016c). Permanent name suppression for a child convicted of homicide. New Zealand Law Journal, 13.Google Scholar
- Lynch, N. (2018). ‘Manifest injustice?’ The judiciary as moderator of penal excess in the sentencing of youth for murder. Howard Journal of Crime and Justice, 57(1), 57–76.Google Scholar
- McDonald, L. (2006). Investigation of the Circumstances Surrounding the Death at Auckland Public Hospital of Prisoner Liam John Ashley of Auckland Central Remand Prison on 25 August 2006, Report to: Chief Executive Department of Corrections. Wellington: New Zealand Department of Corrections.Google Scholar
- Ministry of Justice. (2009). Sentencing and Parole Reform Bill—Initial briefing (SP/ADV/1). Law and Order Select Committee. Tabled April 29, 2009.Google Scholar
- Muncie, J., & Goldson, B. (Eds.). (2006). Comparative Youth Justice. London: Sage.Google Scholar
- Royal College of Psychiatrists. (2006). Child Defendants (Occasional Paper 56). [Online]. Available http://www.rcpsych.ac.uk/usefulresources/publications/collegereports//op/op56.aspx. Accessed February 7, 2018.
- Tomasevski, K. (Ed.). (1986). Children in Adult Prisons: An International Perspective. New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
- UN Committee on the Rights of the Child [UNCRC]. (2007). General Comment No. 10 (2007): Children’s Rights in Juvenile Justice (CRC/C/GC/10). [Online]. Available http://undocs.org/CRC/C/GC/10. Accessed February 7, 2018.
- UN General Assembly. (1985). United Nations Standard Minimum Rules for the Administration of Juvenile Justice [Beijing Rules] (A/RES/40/33). Adopted November 29, 1985.Google Scholar
- UN General Assembly. (1989). Convention on the Rights of the Child (A/RES/44/25). Adopted November 20, 1989.Google Scholar
- UN General Assembly. (1990). United Nations Rules for the Protection of Juveniles Deprived of their Liberty [Havana Rules] (A/RES/45/113). Adopted December 14, 1990.Google Scholar
- UNICEF. (2003). Juvenile Justice Systems: Good Practices in Latin America. Panama: UNICEF Regional Office for the Americas and the Caribbean.Google Scholar
- UNICEF. (2006). Juvenile Justice in South Asia: Improving Protection for Children in Conflict with the Law. Kathmandu: UNICEF Regional Office for South Asia.Google Scholar
- UNICEF. (2010). Good Practices and Promising Initiatives in Juvenile Justice in the CEE/CIS Region. Geneva: UNICEF Regional Office for CEE/CIS.Google Scholar
- Waitangi Tribunal. (2017). Tū Mai te Rangi! Report on the Crown and Disproportionate Reoffending Rates (WAI 2540). [Online]. Available http://maorilawreview.co.nz/2017/04/tu-mai-te-rangi-the-crown-and-disproportionate-maori-reoffending-rates/. Accessed February 7, 2018.
Table of Cases
- R v Nelson  NZHC 3570.Google Scholar
- DP v R  NZCA 476.Google Scholar
- P v R  NZCA 128.Google Scholar
- R v DP & RP  NZHC 1765.Google Scholar
- Te Wini v R  NZCA 201.Google Scholar
- Churchward v R  NZCA 531.Google Scholar
- R v O’Brien  HC New Plymouth T6/02.Google Scholar
- R v Slade and Hamilton  NZCA 19.Google Scholar
- R v Bennett  HC AK CRI-2009-292-002198.Google Scholar
- R v Te Wini  HC ROT CRI-2008-270-000361.Google Scholar