Advertisement

Biofortification of Maize for Protein Quality and Provitamin-A Content

  • Firoz Hossain
  • Vignesh Muthusamy
  • Rajkumar U. Zunjare
  • Hari S. GuptaEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Concepts and Strategies in Plant Sciences book series (CSPS)

Abstract

Protein and micronutrient deficiency have emerged as the major public health problems in under-developed as well as developing countries. Of the several approaches used to alleviate malnutrition, biofortification has turned out to be the most effective and sustainable approach for providing micronutrients in natural forms. Marker-assisted selection (MAS) is an effective strategy to introgress trait(s) especially controlled by recessive gene(s). Maize is an important cereal extensively used as food and feed around the world. The nutritive value of maize, however, remains relatively poor on account of low quality of protein and lower level of micronutrients like provitamin-A. Research initiatives during the past three decades have culminated in the development of quality protein maize (QPM) that possesses nearly double the quantity of lysine and tryptophan, which helps in enhancing the biological value of QPM protein as compared to normal maize. QPM although contains better quality of protein; yet the quantity of provitamin-A is very low (<2 ppm). The current chapter presents an overview of the research work undertaken to enhance the quality of protein in maize grains on the one hand and the level of provitamin-A on the other. Two genes viz. lycopene ε-cyclase (lcyE) and β-carotene hydroxylase1 (crtRB1) play a significant role in enhancing provitamin-A. Favourable alleles of crtRB1 and lcyE gene(s) were introgressed in commercial hybrids using MAS. The resultant hybrids were found to contain 4.5-fold more provitamin-A as compared to original hybrids. Stability of provitamin-A in QPM as well as normal maize and possible impact of these multi-nutrient hybrids in reducing protein and vitamin-A deficiency have also been discussed.

Keywords

Biofortification Marker-assisted selection Maize Quality protein maize Provitamin-A 

References

  1. Akalu G, Taffesse S, Gunaratna NS et al (2010) The effectiveness of quality protein maize in improving the nutritional status of young children in the Ethiopian highlands. Food Nutr Bull 31:418–429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aluru M, Xu Y, Guo R et al (2008) Generation of transgenic maize with enhanced provitamin A content. J Exp Bot 59:3551–3562.  https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/ern212CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Andersson MS, Saltzman A, Virk PS et al (2017) Progress update: crop development of biofortified staple food crops under Harvestplus. Afr J Food Agric Nutr Dev 17:11905–11935.  https://doi.org/10.18697/ajfand.78.HarvestPlus05CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Azmach G, Gedil M, Menkir A et al (2013) Marker-trait association analysis of functional gene markers for provitamin A levels across diverse tropical yellow maize inbred lines. BMC Plant Biol 13:227.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2229-13-227CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Azmach G, Menkir A, Spillane S (2018) Genetic loci controlling carotenoid biosynthesis in diverse tropical maize lines. Gen Genom Genet 8(3):1049–1065Google Scholar
  6. Babu R, Nair SK, Kumar A et al (2005) Two-generation marker-aided backcrossing for rapid conversion of normal maize lines to quality protein maize (QPM). Theor Appl Genet 111:888–897.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-005-0011-6CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Babu R, Rojas NP, Gao S et al (2013) Validation of the effects of molecular marker polymorphisms in LcyE and CrtRB1 on provitamin A concentrations for 26 tropical maize populations. Theor Appl Genet 126:389–399.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-012-1987-3CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Babu BK, Agrawal PK, Saha S et al (2015) Mapping QTLs for opaque2 modifiers influencing the tryptophan content in quality protein maize using genomic and candidate gene-based SSRs of lysine and tryptophan metabolic pathway. Plant Cell Rep 34:37–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bain LE, Awah PK, Geraldine N et al (2013) Malnutrition in Sub-Saharan Africa: burden, causes and prospects. Pan Afr Med J 15:1–9.  https://doi.org/10.11604/pamj.2013.15.120.253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bjarnason M, Vasal SK (1992) Breeding of quality protein maize. Plant Breed Rev 9:181–216Google Scholar
  11. Black RE, Victora CG, Walker SP et al (2013) Maternal and child undernutrition and overweight in low-income and middle-income countries. Lancet 382:427–451CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bouis H (2018) Reducing mineral and vitamin deficiencies through biofortification: progress under HarvestPlus. In: Biesalski HK, Birner R (eds) Hidden hunger: strategies to improve nutrition quality, vol 118. Karger, Basel, pp 112–122.  https://doi.org/10.1159/000484342
  13. Bouis HE, Saltzman A (2017) Improving nutrition through biofortification: a review of evidence from HarvestPlus, 2003 through 2016. Glob Food Secur 12:49–58.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2017.01.009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bouis HE, Welch RM (2010) Biofortification—a sustainable agricultural strategy for reducing micronutrient malnutrition in the global south. Crop Sci 50:S20–S32.  https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2009.09.0531CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bouis HE, Hotz C, McClafferty B et al (2011) Biofortification: a new tool to reduce micronutrient malnutrition. Food Nutr Bull 32:S31–S40Google Scholar
  16. Bressani R (1994) opaque-2 corn in human nutrition and utilization. In: Larkins BA, Mertz ET (eds) Proceedings of international symposium on quality protein maize, pp 41–63Google Scholar
  17. Brochetto-Braga MR, Leite A, Arruda P (1992) Partial purification and characterization of lysine-ketoglutarate reductase in normal and opaque-2 maize endosperms. Plant Physiol 98:1139–1147CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Burgoon KG, Hansen JA, Knabe JA (1992) Nutritional value of quality protein maize for starter and finisher swine. J Anim Sci 70:811–817CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Burnett RJ, Larkins BA (1999) Opaque2 modifiers alter transcription of the 27-kDa c-zein genes in maize. Mol Gen Genet 261:908–916CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Choudhary M, Muthusamy V, Hossain F et al (2014) Characterization of β-carotene rich MAS-derived maize inbreds possessing rare genetic variation in β-carotene hydroxylase gene. Indian J Genet Plant Breed 74:620–623.  https://doi.org/10.5958/0975-6906.2014.00900.6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Choudhary M, Hossain F, Muthusamy V et al (2015) Microsatellite marker based genetic diversity analyses of novel maize inbreds possessing rare allele of β-carotene hydroxylase (crtRB1) for their utilization in β-carotene enrichment. J Plant Biochem Biotechnol 25:12–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Collard BCY, Jahufer MZZ, Brouwer JB et al (2005) An introduction to markers, quantitative trait loci (QTL) mapping and marker-assisted selection for crop improvement: the basic concepts. Euphytica 142:169–196.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-005-1681-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Dannenhoffer JM, Bostwick DE, Or E et al (1995) opaque-15, a maize mutation with properties of a defective opaque-2 modifier. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 92:1931–1935CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Danson JW, Mbogari M, Kimani M et al (2006) Marker-assisted introgression of opaque-2 gene into herbicide resistant elite maize inbred lines. Afr J Biotechnol 5:2417–2422Google Scholar
  25. Dhliwayo T, Palacios-Rojas N, Babu R et al (2014) Vitamin A maize. Biofortification progress brief 5. International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI), Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  26. Diaz-Gomez J, Moreno JA, Angulo E et al (2017) High-carotenoid biofortified maize is an alternative to color additives in poultry feed. Anim Feed Sci Technol.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2017.06.007
  27. Dube N, Mashurabad PC, Hossain F et al (2018) β-carotene bio-accessibility from biofortified maize (Zea mays L.) is related to its density and is negatively influenced by lutein and zeaxanthin. Food Funct 9:379–388.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c7fo01034fCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ekpa O, Palacios-Rojas N, Krusemanc G et al (2018) Sub-Saharan African maize-based foods: technological perspectives to increase the food and nutrition security impacts of maize breeding programmes. Global Food Secur 17:48–56.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2018.03.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Emerson RA, Beadle GE, Fraser AC (1935) A summary of linkage studies in maize. In: Cornell University Agricultural Experiment Station Memoir, vol 180. pp 1–83Google Scholar
  30. Foreign Agricultural Service/USDA (2017) Office of global analysis. https://ipad.fas.usda.gov
  31. Galili G, Amir R (2013) Fortifying plants with the essential amino acids lysine and methionine to improve nutritional quality. Plant Biotechnol J 11:211–222.  https://doi.org/10.1111/pbi.12025CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Gebremeskel S, Garcia-oliveira AL, Menkir A et al (2017) Effectiveness of predictive markers for marker assisted selection of provitamin A carotenoids in medium-late maturing maize (Zea mays L.) inbred lines. J Cereal Sci 79:27–34.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcs.2017.09.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Gibbon BC, Wang X, Larkins BA (2003) Altered starch structure is associated with endosperm modification in quality protein maize. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100:15329–15334CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  34. Giuliano G (2014) Plant carotenoids: genomics meets multi-gene engineering. Curr Opin Plant Biol 19:111–117.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbi.2014.05.006CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Global Nutrition Report (2017) Available online at: https://www.globalnutritionreport.org
  36. Gregory T, Sewando P (2013) Determinants of the probability of adopting of quality protein maize (QPM) technology in Tanzania: a logistic regression analysis. Int J Dev Sustain 2:729–746Google Scholar
  37. Gunaratna N, De Groote H, Nestel P et al (2010) A meta-analysis of community-based studies on quality protein maize. Food Policy 35:202–210.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2009.11.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Gupta HS, Agrawal PK, Mahajan V et al (2009) Quality protein maize for nutritional security: rapid development of short duration hybrids through molecular marker assisted breeding. Curr Sci 96:230–237Google Scholar
  39. Gupta HS, Raman B, Agrawal PK et al (2013) Accelerated development of quality protein maize hybrid through marker-assisted introgression of opaque-2 allele. Plant Breed 132:77–82.  https://doi.org/10.1111/pbr.12009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Gupta HS, Hossain F, Muthusamy V (2015) Biofortification of maize: an Indian perspective. Indian J Genet 75:1–22.  https://doi.org/10.5958/0975-6906.2015.00001.2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Gutierrez-Rojas A, Betran J, Scott MP et al (2010) Quantitative trait loci for endosperm modification and amino acid contents in quality protein maize. Crop Sci 50:870–879.  https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2008.10.0634CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Habben JE, Moro GL, Hunter BG et al (1995) Elongation factor la concentration is highly correlated with the lysine content of maize endosperm. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 92:8640–8644CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  43. Harjes CE, Rocheford TR, Bai L et al (2008) Natural genetic variation in lycopene epsilon cyclase tapped for maize biofortification. Science 319:330–333.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1150255CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  44. Hellin J, Erenstein O (2009) Maize poultry value chains in India: implications for research and development. J New Seeds 10:245–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Heying EK, Tanumihardjo JP, Vasic V et al (2014) Biofortified orange maize enhances β-cryptoxanthin concentrations in egg yolks of laying hens better than tangerine peel fortificant. J Agric Food Chem 62:11892–11900.  https://doi.org/10.1021/jf5037195CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Holding DR, Hunter BG, Chung T et al (2008) Genetic analysis of opaque2 modifier loci in quality protein maize. Theor Appl Genet 117:157–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Holding DR, Hunter BG, Klingler JP et al (2011) Characterization of opaque2 modifier QTLs and candidate genes in recombinant inbred lines derived from the K0326Y quality protein maize inbred. Theor Appl Genet 122:783–794.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-010-1486-3CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Hospital F, Chevalet C, Mulsant P (1992) Using markers in gene introgression programs. Genetics 132:1199–1210PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  49. Hossain F, Prasanna BM, Kumar R et al (2007) Genetic analysis of grain yield and endosperm protein quality in quality protein maize (QPM) lines. Indian J Genet 67:315–322Google Scholar
  50. Hossain F, Prasanna BM, Kumar R et al (2008a) The genotype × pollination mode interaction affects kernel modification in quality protein maize (QPM) genotypes. Indian J Genet 68:132–138Google Scholar
  51. Hossain F, Prasanna BM, Kumar R et al (2008b) Genetic analysis of kernel modification in quality protein maize (QPM) genotypes. Indian J Genet 68:1–9Google Scholar
  52. Hossain F, Nepolean T, Vishwakarma AK et al (2013) Mapping and validation of microsatellite markers linked to sugary1 and shrunken2 genes in maize. J Plant Biochem Biotechnol 24:135–142.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13562-013-0245-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Hossain F, Muthusamy V, Pandey N et al (2018) Marker-assisted introgression of opaque2 allele for rapid conversion of elite maize hybrids into quality protein maize. J Genet 97:287–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Howe JA, Tanumihardjo SA (2006a) Evaluation of analytical methods for carotenoid extraction from biofortified maize (Zea mays sp.). J Agric Food Chem 54:7992–7997.  https://doi.org/10.1021/jf062256fCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Howe JA, Tanumihardjo SA (2006b) Carotenoid-biofortified maize maintains adequate vitamin A status in Mongolian gerbils. J Nutr 136:2562–25677CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Institute of Medicine (2001) Dietary reference intakes for vitamin A, vitamin K, arsenic, boron, chromium, copper, iodine, iron, manganese, molybdenum, nickel, silicon, vanadium, and zinc. Panel on Micronutrients, National Academies Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  57. Jia M, Wu H, Clay K et al (2013) Identification and characterization of lysine-rich proteins and starch biosynthesis genes in the opaque2 mutant by transcriptional and proteomic analysis. BMC Plant Biol 13:60.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2229-13-60CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  58. Jompuk C, Cheuchart P, Jompuk P et al (2011) Improved tryptophan content in maize with opaque-2 gene using marker assisted selection (MAS) in backcross and selfing generations. Kasetsart J Nat Sci 45:666–674Google Scholar
  59. Kostadinovic M, Ignjatovic-Micic D, Vancetovic J et al (2016) Development of high tryptophan maize near isogenic lines adapted to temperate regions through marker assisted selection—impediments and benefits. PLoS ONE 11:e0167635.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0167635CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  60. Lebaka NG, Coors JG, Shaver RG (2013) Quantitative trait loci for ruminal degradability in opaque endosperm2 (o2) maize. Crop Sci 378–384.  https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2011.12.0646
  61. Li S, Nugroho A, Rocheford T et al (2010) Vitamin A equivalence of the β-carotene in β-carotene- biofortified maize porridge consumed by women. Am J Clin Nutr 92:1105–1112.  https://doi.org/10.3945/ajcn.2010.29802CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Lin K, Bockholt AJ, Smith JD (1997) Utilization of molecular probes to facilitate development of quality protein maize. MNL 71:22–23Google Scholar
  63. Liu YQ, Davis CR, Schmaelzle ST et al (2012) β-cryptoxanthin biofortified maize (Zea mays) increases β-cryptoxanthin concentration and enhances the color of chicken egg yolk. Poult Sci 91:432–438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Liu L, Jeffers D, Zhang Y et al (2015) Introgression of the crtRB1 gene into quality protein maize inbred lines using molecular markers. Mol Breed 35:154.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11032-015-0349-7CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  65. Liu H, Shi J, Sun C et al (2016) Gene duplication confers enhanced expression of 27-kDa γ-zein for endosperm modification in quality protein maize. Proc Natl Acad Sci 113:4964–4969CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Lividini K, Fiedler JL (2015) Assessing the promise of biofortification: a case study of high provitamin A maize in Zambia. Food Policy 54:65–77.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2015.04.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Lopes MA, Larkins BA (1995) Genetic analysis of opaque2 modifier gene activity in maize endosperm. Theor Appl Genet 91:274–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Lopes MA, Takasaki K, Bostwick DE et al (1995) Identification of two opaque2 modifier loci in quality protein maize. Mol Gen Genet 247:603–613CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Lopez-Valenzuela JA, Gibbon BC, Holding DR et al (2004) Cytoskeletal proteins are coordinately increased in maize genotypes with high levels of eEF1A. Plant Physiol 135:1784–1797CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  70. Magulama E, Sales EK (2009) Marker assisted introgression of opaque-2 gene into elite maize inbred lines. USM R & D 17:131–135Google Scholar
  71. Manna R, Okello DK, Imanywoha J et al (2005) Enhancing introgression of the opaque-2 trait into elite maize lines using simple sequence repeats. Afr Crop Sci J 13:215–226Google Scholar
  72. Menkir A, Maziya-Dixon B, Mengesha W et al (2017) Accruing genetic gain in provitamin A enrichment from harnessing diverse maize germplasm. Euphytica 213:1–12.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-017-1890-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Mertz ET, Bates LS, Nelson OE (1964) Mutant gene that changes protein composition and increases lysine content of maize endosperm. Science 145:279–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Moreno JA, Diaz-Gomez J, Nogareda C et al (2016) The distribution of carotenoids in hens fed on biofortified maize is influenced by feed composition, absorption, resource allocation and storage. Sci Rep 6:35346.  https://doi.org/10.1038/srep35346CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  75. Motto M, Maddolini M, Panziani G et al (1988) Molecular cloning of the o2-m5 allele of Zea mays, using transposon tagging. Mol Gen Genet 121:488–494CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Muthusamy V, Hossain F, Thirunavukkarasu N et al (2014) Development of β-carotene rich maize hybrids through marker-assisted introgression of β-carotene hydroxylase allele. PLoS ONE 9:1–22.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.011358310.1007/BF00020113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Muthusamy V, Hossain F, Thirunavukkarasu N et al (2015a) Genetic variability and inter-relationship of kernel carotenoids among indigenous and exotic maize (Zea mays L.) inbreds. Cereal Res Commun 43:567–578.  https://doi.org/10.1556/0806.43.2015.012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Muthusamy V, Hossain F, Thirunavukkarasu N et al (2015b) Molecular characterization of exotic and indigenous maize inbreds for biofortification with kernel carotenoids. Food Biotechnol 29:276–295.  https://doi.org/10.1080/08905436.2015.1059768CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Muthusamy V, Hossain F, Thirunavukkarasu N et al (2015c) Allelic variations for lycopene-ε-cyclase and β-carotene hydroxylase genes in maize inbreds and their utilization in β-carotene enrichment programme. Cogent Food Agric 1:1033141.  https://doi.org/10.1080/23311932.2015.1033141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Muthusamy V, Hossain F, Thirunavukkarasu N et al (2016) Genetic analyses of kernel carotenoids in novel maize genotypes possessing rare allele of β-carotene hydroxylase gene. Cereal Res Commun 44:669–680CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Muzhingi T, Gadaga TH, Siwela AH et al (2011) Yellow maize with high β-carotene is an effective source of vitamin A in healthy Zimbabwean men. Am J Clin Nutr 94:510–519.  https://doi.org/10.3945/ajcn.110.006486CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  82. Naqvi S, Zhu C, Farre G et al (2009) Transgenic multivitamin corn through biofortification of endosperm with three vitamins representing three distinct metabolic pathways. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106:7762–7767.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0901412106CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  83. Nedi G, Alamerew S, Tulu L (2016) Review on quality protein maize breeding for Ethiopia. J Biol Agric Healthc 6:84–96Google Scholar
  84. Neeraja CN, Babu VR, Ram S et al (2017) Biofortification in cereals: progress and prospects. Curr Sci 113:1050–1057.  https://doi.org/10.18520/cs/v113/i06/1050-1057CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Nyakurwa CS, Gasura E, Mabasa S (2017) Potential for quality protein maize for reducing protein energy undernutrition in maize dependent Sub-Saharan African countries: a review. Afr Crop Sci J 25:521–537.  https://doi.org/10.4314/acsj.v25i4.9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Nyanamba T, De Groote H, August WR (2003) Quality protein maize for the feed industry in Kenya. Poster paper presented at the International Agricultural Economics Association, DurbanGoogle Scholar
  87. Odunitan-Wayas FA, Kolanisi U, Chimonyo M et al (2016) Effect of provitamin A biofortified maize inclusion on quality of meat from indigenous chickens. J Appl Poult Res 25:581–590CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Onimisi PA, Dafwang II, Omage JJ et al (2008) Apparent digestibility of feed nutrients, total tract and ileal amino acids of broiler chicken fed quality protein maize (Obatampa) and normal maize. Int J Poult Sci 7:959–963CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Owens BF, Gore MA, Magallanes-Lundback M et al (2014) A foundation for provitamin a biofortification of maize: genome-wide association and genomic prediction models of carotenoid levels. Genetics 198:1699–1716.  https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.114.169979CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  90. Paes MCD, Bicudo MH (1994) Nutritional perspective of quality protein maize. In: Larkins BA, Mertz ET (eds) Quality protein maize. pp 65–77Google Scholar
  91. Palmer AC, Craft NE, Schulze KJ et al (2018) Impact of biofortified maize consumption on serum carotenoid concentrations in Zambian children. Eur J Clin Nutr.  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41430-017-0054-1
  92. Panda AK, Zaidi PH, Rama Rao S et al (2014) Efficacy of quality protein maize in meeting energy and essential amino acid requirements in broiler chicken production. J Appl Anim Res 42:133–5139.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09712119.2013.822812CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Pandey N, Hossain F, Kumar K et al (2015) Molecular characterization of endosperm and amino acids—modifications among quality protein maize inbreds. Plant Breed.  https://doi.org/10.1111/pbr.12328
  94. Pineda-Hidalgo KV, Lavin-Aramburo M, Salazar-Salas NY et al (2011) Characterization of free amino acid QTLs in maize opaque2 inbred lines. J Cereal Sci 53:250–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Pixley K, Palacios-Rojas N, Babu R et al (2013) Carotenoids and human health. In: Tanumihardjo S (ed) Chapter: biofortification of maize with provitamin a carotenoids. Springer Science + Business Media, New York, pp 271–292.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-62703-203-2_17
  96. Prasanna BM, Vasal SK, Kassahun B et al (2001) Quality protein maize. Curr Sci 81:1308–1319Google Scholar
  97. Sarika K, Hossain F, Muthusamy V et al (2017) Exploration of novel opaque16 mutation as a source for high-lysine and -tryptophan in maize endosperm. Indian J Genet 77:59–64Google Scholar
  98. Sarika K, Hossain F, Muthusamy V et al (2018a) Opaque16 a high lysine and tryptophan mutant, does not influence the key physico-biochemical characteristics in maize kernel. PLoS ONE 2:1–14Google Scholar
  99. Sarika K, Hossain F, Muthusamy V et al (2018b) Marker-assisted pyramiding of opaque2 and novel opaque16 genes for further enrichment of lysine and tryptophan in sub-tropical maize. Plant Sci 272:142–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Schmidt RJ, Burr FA, Burr B (1987) Transposon tagging and molecular analysis of the maize regulatory locus opaque-2. Science 238.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.2823388
  101. Schmidt RJ, Burr FA, Aukerman MJ et al (1990) Maize regulatory gene opaque-2 encodes a protein with a leucine zipper motif that binds to zein DNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 87:46–50CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  102. Segal G, Song R, Messing J (2003) A new opaque variant of maize by a single dominant RNA-interference-inducing transgene. Genetics 165:387–397PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  103. Serna-Saldívar SO, Gomez MH, Islas-Rubio AR et al (1992) The alkaline processing properties of quality protein maize. In: Mertz E (ed) Quality protein maize, pp 273–293Google Scholar
  104. Sheftel J, Gannon BM, Davis CR (2017) Provitamin A-biofortified maize consumption increases serum xanthophylls and 13C-natural abundance of retinol in Zambian children. Exp Biol Med 1–7.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1535370217728500
  105. Shiferaw B, Prasanna BM, Hellin J et al (2011) Crops that feed the world 6. Past successes and future challenges to the role played by maize in global food security. Food Secur 3:307–327.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-011-0140-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Simpungwe E, Dhliwayo T, Palenberg M et al (2017) Orange maize in Zambia: crop development and delivery experience. Afr J Food Agric Nutr Dev 17:11973–11999.  https://doi.org/10.18697/ajfand.78.HarvestPlus08CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Skjaerven KH, Jakt LM, Jorge M et al (2018) Parental micronutrient deficiency distorts liver DNA methylation and expression of lipid genes associated with a fatty-liver-like phenotype in offspring. Sci Rep 8:3055.  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-21211-5CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  108. Sommer A, West KP (1996) Vitamin A deficiency: health survival and vision. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  109. Sowa M, Yu J, Palacios-Rojas N et al (2017) Retention of carotenoids in biofortified maize flour and b-cryptoxanthin-enhanced eggs after household cooking. ACS Omega 2:7320–7328.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.7b01202CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  110. Tandzi LN, Mutengwa CS, Ngonkeu ELM (2017) Breeding for quality protein maize (QPM) varieties: a review. Agronomy 7:80.  https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy7040080CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Tanumihardjo SA (2011) Vitamin A: biomarkers of nutrition for development. Am J Clin Nutr 94:658–665.  https://doi.org/10.3945/ajcn.110.005777CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Teklewold A, Wegary D, Tadesse A et al (2015) Quality protein maize (QPM): a guide to the technology and its promotion in Ethiopia. CIMMYT, Addis Ababa, EthiopiaGoogle Scholar
  113. Tessema M, Gunaratna NS, Donato K et al (2016) Translating the impact of quality protein maize into improved nutritional status for Ethiopian children: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. BMC Nutr 2:54.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s40795-016-0089-zCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. Thakkar SK, Failla ML (2008) Micellarization of β-carotene during in vitro digestion of maize and uptake by Caco-2 intestinal cells is minimally affected by xanthophylls. The FASEB J 22:1105–1106Google Scholar
  115. Unger E, Parsons RL, Schmidt RJ et al (1993) Dominant negative mutants of Opaque2 suppress transactivation of a 22-kD zein promoter by Opaque2 in maize endosperm cells. Plant Cell 5:831–841CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  116. Vallabhaneni R, Gallagher CE, Licciardello N et al (2009) Metabolite sorting of a germplasm collection reveals the hydroxylase3 locus as a new target for maize provitamin a biofortification. Plant Physiol 151:1635–1645.  https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.109.145177CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  117. Varshney RK, Ribaut JM, Buckler ES et al (2012) Can genomics boost productivity of orphan crops? Nat Biotechnol 30:1172–1176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. Vasal SK (2000) The quality protein maize story. Food Nutr Bull 21:445–450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. Vasal SK (2001) High quality protein corn. In: Hallauer A (ed) Speciality corn, 2nd edn. CRC, Boca Raton, FL, pp 85–129Google Scholar
  120. Vasal SK, Villegas E, Bajarnason M et al (1980) Genetic modifiers and breeding strategies in developing hard endosperm opaque-2 materials. In: Pollmer WG, Philips RH (eds) Improvement of quality traits for silage use. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, The Hague, Netherlands, pp 37–71Google Scholar
  121. Vasal SK, Villegas E, Tang CY (1984) Recent advances in the development of quality protein maize germplasm at CIYMMT. Cereal grain improvement. IAEA, Vienna, pp 167–189Google Scholar
  122. Vignesh M, Hossain F, Nepolean T et al (2012) Genetic variability for kernel beta-carotene and utilization of crtRB1 3’TE gene for biofortification in maize (Zea mays L.). Indian J Genet Plant Breed 72:189–194Google Scholar
  123. Vignesh M, Nepolean T, Hossain F et al (2013) Sequence variation in 3′UTR region of crtRB1 gene and its effect on β-carotene accumulation in maize kernel. J Plant Biochem Biotechnol 22:401–408.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13562-012-0168-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  124. Vivek BS, Krivanek AF, Palacios-Rojas N et al (2008) Breeding quality protein maize (QPM) cultivars: protocols for developing QPM cultivars. CIMMYT, MexicoGoogle Scholar
  125. Wang XL, Larkins BA (2001) Genetic analysis of amino acid accumulation in opaque2 maize endosperm. Plant Physiol 125:1766–1777CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  126. Wang X, Woo Y, Kim C et al (2001) Quantitative trait locus mapping of loci influencing elongation factor 1a content in maize endosperm. Plant Physiol 125:1271–1282CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  127. Wang X, Lopez-Valenzuela JA, Gibbon BC et al (2007) Characterization of monofunctional aspartate kinase genes in maize and their relationship with free amino acid content in the endosperm. J Exp Bot 58:2653–2660CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  128. WHO/FAO/UNU (2007) Protein and amino acid requirements in human nutrition. 1764 report of a Joint WHO/FAO/UNU Expert Consultation, WHO technical report series, no 935. GenevaGoogle Scholar
  129. Wu Y, Messing J (2011) Novel genetic selection system for quantitative trait loci of quality protein maize. Genetics 188:1019–1022.  https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.111.131078
  130. Wu Y, Holding DR, Messing J (2010) γ-Zeins are essential for endosperm modification in quality protein maize. Proc Natl Acad Sci 107(29):12810–12815CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  131. Yadava DK, Choudhury PK, Hossain F et al (2017) Biofortified varieties: sustainable way to alleviate malnutrition. Indian Council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi, pp 7–10Google Scholar
  132. Yan J, Kandianis CB, Harjes CE et al (2010) Rare genetic variation at Zea mays crtRB1 increases β-carotene in maize grain. Nat Genet 42:322–327.  https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.551CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  133. Yang W, Zheng Y, Zheng W et al (2005) Molecular genetic mapping of a high-lysine mutant gene (opaque-16) and the double recessive effect with opaque-2 in maize. Mol Breed 15:257–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  134. Yang L, Wang W, Yang W et al (2013) Marker-assisted selection for pyramiding the waxy and opaque16 genes in maize using cross and backcross schemes. Mol Breed 31:767–775CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  135. Zhang WL, Yang WP, Chen ZW et al (2010) Molecular marker-assisted selection for o2 introgression lines with o16 gene in corn. Acta Agron Sin 36:1302–1309Google Scholar
  136. Zhang W, Yang W, Wang M et al (2013) Increasing lysine content of waxy maize through introgression of opaque2 and opaque16 genes using molecular assisted and biochemical development. PLoS ONE 8:1–10Google Scholar
  137. Zhu C, Naqvi S, Breitenbach J et al (2008) Combinatorial genetic transformation generates a library of metabolic phenotypes for the carotenoid pathway in maize. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105:18232–18237CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  138. Zuma MK, Kolanisi U, Modi AT et al (2018) The potential of integrating provitamin A-biofortified maize in smallholder farming systems to reduce malnourishment in South Africa. Int J Environ Res Public Health 15:805.  https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15040805CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  139. Zunjare RU, Hossain F, Muthusamy V et al (2017) Influence of rare alleles of β-carotene hydroxylase and lycopene epsilon cyclase genes on accumulation of provitamin A carotenoids in maize kernels. Plant Breed 136:872–880.  https://doi.org/10.1111/pbr.12548CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  140. Zunjare RU, Hossain F, Muthusamy V et al (2018a) Development of biofortified maize hybrids through marker-assisted stacking of β-carotene hydroxylase, lycopene-ε cyclase and opaque2 genes. Front Plant Sci 9:178.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.00178CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  141. Zunjare RU, Chhabra R, Hossain F et al (2018b) Molecular characterization of 5′ UTR of the lycopene epsilon cyclase (lcyE) gene among exotic and indigenous inbreds for its utilization in maize biofortification. 3 Biotech 8:75.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13205-018-1100-y
  142. Zunjare RU, Chhabra R, Hossain F et al (2018c) Development and validation of multiplex-PCR assay for simultaneous detection of rare alleles of crtRB1 and lcyE governing higher accumulation of provitamin A in maize kernel. J Plant Biochem Biotechnol 27:208–214.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13562-017-0432-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Firoz Hossain
    • 1
  • Vignesh Muthusamy
    • 1
  • Rajkumar U. Zunjare
    • 1
  • Hari S. Gupta
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research InstituteNew DelhiIndia

Personalised recommendations