Advertisement

Playing with Zombie Problems: Exploring the Gender-Digital-Play Assemblage in Online Mental Health Campaigns

  • Teresa Swist
  • Philippa Collin
Chapter

Abstract

It has become increasingly common for services and public policy initiatives to use digital campaigns to encourage youth mental health promotion practices. However, there is little critique of the gender positions made available in these campaigns or the role that digital cultures and leisure—beyond gamification—play in assembling gendered accounts of mental health. Drawing on analysis of the participatory design of a youth mental health campaign, Something Haunting You?, we explore how the creation of campaigns can shift in focus from predetermined gender and behaviour change towards the complex assemblage of gender, digital, and play practices.

References

  1. Akrich, M. (1992). The de-scription of technical objects. In W. Bijker & J. Law (Eds.), Shaping technology/building society. Cambridge, UK: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  2. Akrich, M., & Latour, B. (1992). A summary of a convenient vocabulary for the semiotics of human and non-human assemblies. In W. Bijker & J. Law (Eds.), Shaping technology/building society. Cambridge, UK: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  3. Buchanan, I. M. (2014). Assemblage theory and schizoanalysis. Panoptikum, 13(20), 115–125.Google Scholar
  4. Butler, J. (1988). Performative acts and gender constitution: An essay in phenomenology and feminist theory. Theatre Journal, 40(4), 519–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Butler, J. (1993). Bodies that matter. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Bruns, A. (2016). Prosumption, produsage. In B. Jensen, C. Klaus, T. Robert, J. D. Pooley, & E. W. Rothenbuhler (Eds.), The international encyclopedia of communication theory and philosophy. London: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Google Scholar
  7. Chau, C. (2010). Youtube as a participatory culture. New directions for student leadership, 128, 65–74.Google Scholar
  8. Collin, P., & Swist, T. (2016). From products to publics? The potential of participatory design for research on youth, safety and well-being. Journal of Youth Studies, 19(3), 305–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Connell, R. W., & Messerschmidt, J. W. (2005). Hegemonic masculinity: Rethinking the concept. Gender & Society, 19(6), 829–959. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243205278639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Deleuze, G. & Guattari, F. A (1987). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia (Brian Massumi, Trans.). Minneapolis, London: The University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  11. Eberle, S. G. (2014). The elements of play: Towards a philosophy and a definition of play. Journal of Play, 6(20), 214–233. Retrieved from http://www.journalofplay.org/sites/www.journalofplay.org/files/pdf-articles/6-2-article-elements-of-play.pdf.Google Scholar
  12. Ellis, L., Collin, P., Davenport, T., Hurley, P., Burns, J., & Hickie, I. (2012). Young men, mental health and technology: Implications for service design and delivery in the digital age. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 14(6), e160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ellis, L., Collin, P., Hurley, P., Davenport, T., Burns, J., & Hickie, I. (2013). Young men’s attitudes and behaviour in relation to mental health and technology: Implications for the development of online mental health services. BMC Psychiatry, 13, 119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Farrimond, H. (2011). Beyond the caveman: Rethinking masculinity in relation to men’s help-seeking. Health: An Interdisciplinary Journal for the Social Study of Health, Illness and Medicine, 16(2), 208–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fleming, T. M., Bavin, L., Stasiak, K., Hermansson-Webb, E., Merry, S. N., Cheek, C., Lucassen, M., Lau, H. M., Pollmuller, B., & Hetrick, S. (2017). Serious Games and Gamification for Mental Health: Current Status and Promising Directions. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 7, 215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fullagar, S., Rich, E., & Francombe-Webb, J. (2017). New kinds of (ab)normal?: Public pedagogies, affect, and youth mental health in the digital age. Social Sciences, 6(99). https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci6030099.
  17. Hagen, P., Collin, P., Metcalf, A., Nicholas, M., Rahilly, K., & Swainston, N. (2012). Participatory design of evidence-based online youth mental health promotion, prevention and early intervention and treatment. Abbotsford, BC: Young and Well CRC.Google Scholar
  18. Harvey, A. (2011). Architectures of Participation in Digital Play. Information, Communication & Society, 14(3), 303–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hubner, L., Leaning, M., & Manning, P. (2014). Introduction. In L. Hubner, M. Leaning, & P. Manning (Eds.), The zombie renaissance in popular culture (pp. 3–14). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  20. Huuki, T., Manninen, S., & Sunnari, V. (2010). Humour as a resource and strategy for boys to gain status in the field of informal school. Gender and Education, 22(4), 369–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ingold, T. (2011). Being alive: Essays on movement, knowledge and description. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Johnson, D., Deterding, S., Kuhn, K.-A., Staneva, A., Stoyanov, S., & Hides, L. (2016). Gamification for health and wellbeing: A systematic review of the literature. Internet Interventions, 6, 89–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. LEGO Learning Institute. (2003). The changing face of children’s play culture: Children’s play, learning and communication in a technology driven world. Retrieved from http://www.carsten-jessen.dk/Play_Culture.pdf
  24. Lupton, D. (2016). Foreward: Lively devices, lively data and lively leisure studies. Leisure Studies, 35(6), 709–711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Nasiruddin, M., Halabi, M., Dao, A., Chen, K., & Brown, B. (2013). Zombies – A pop culture resource for public health awareness. Emerging Infectious Diseases, 19(5), 809–813.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. O’Brien, R., Hunt, K., & Hart, G. (2005). ‘It’s caveman stuff, but that is to a certain extent how guys still operate’: Men’s accounts of masculinity and help-seeking. Social Science and Medicine, 61, 503–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Schack, M. H. (2014). Perspectives on comics and their literary merit. Retrieved from http://www.makingithappen.us/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/Perspectives-on-Comics-and-their-Literary-Merit.pdf
  28. Silk, M., Millington, B., Rich, E., & Bush, A. (2016). (Re-)thinking digital leisure. Leisure Studies, 35(6), 712–723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Spears, B. A., Taddeo, C. M., Barnes, A., Collin, P., Swist, T., Webb-Williams, J., Brock, C., Kavanagh, P., Drennan, J., Razzell, M., & Borbone, V. (2016). Something haunting you? Reframing and promoting help-seeking for young men: The co-creation and evaluation of a social marketing campaign. Melbourne, VIC: Young and Well Cooperative Research Centre.Google Scholar
  30. Spencer-Thomas, S., Hindman, J., & Conrad, J. (2012). Man therapy: An innovative approach to suicide prevention for working aged men. Retrieved from https://mantherapy.org/pdf/ManTherapy.pdf
  31. Swist, T., Hodge, B., & Collin, P. (2016). ‘Cultural making’: How complexity and power relations are modulated in transdisciplinary research. Continuum, 30(4), 489–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Vasudevan, L. (2010). Education remix: New media, literacies, and the emerging digital geographies. Digital Culture & Education, 2(1), 62–82.Google Scholar
  33. Whitebread, D. (with M. Basilio, M. Kuvalja and M. Verma). (2012) The importance of play: A report on the value of children’s play with a series of policy recommendations. Retrieved from http://www.importanceofplay.eu/IMG/pdf/dr_david_whitebread_-_the_importance_of_play.pdf

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for Culture and SocietyWestern Sydney UniversitySydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations