Digital Dilemmas: Transforming Gender Identities and Power Relations in Everyday Life

  • Diana C. Parry
  • Luc S. Cousineau
  • Corey W. Johnson
  • Simone Fullagar


The proliferation of digital technologies, virtual spaces, and new forms of engagement raise key questions about the changing nature of relationships and identities within democratic societies. This introductory chapter explores the nature of digital spaces and the connected and compounded effects those spaces can have on shaping digital embodiments. The discursive and ideological formation of gender imbricated in gender injustice is discussed, and we outline how the intersection of gendered understandings with technological fluidity creates spaces where individuals can be simultaneously empowered and subjugated. In doing so, we will draw upon existing work that has explored elements of these dilemmas and bring those works together to examine the interrelationships of gendered leisure, advocacy, and civic engagement. We seek to advance new approaches to understanding, critiquing, and mobilizing action.


  1. Bivens, R. (2017). The gender binary will not be deprogrammed: Ten years of coding gender on Facebook. New Media & Society, 19(6), 880–898. Scholar
  2. Bivens, R., & Haimson, O. L. (2016). Baking gender into social media design: How platforms shape categories for users and advertisers. Social Media Society, 2(4), 2056305116672486.Google Scholar
  3. Black Lives Matter. (2018). Black Lives Matter: Herstory. Retrieved from
  4. Braithwaite, A. (2016). It’s about ethics in games journalism? Gamergaters and geek masculinity. Social Media Society, 2(4), 2056305116672484.Google Scholar
  5. Burgess, J., & Matamoros-Fernández, A. (2016). Mapping sociocultural controversies across digital media platforms: One week of# gamergate on twitter, YouTube, and Tumblr. Communication Research and Practice, 2(1), 79–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Carstensen, T. (2014). Gender and social media: Sexism, empowerment, or the irrelevance of gender? In C. Carter, L. Steiner, & L. McLaughlin (Eds.), The Routledge companion to media & gender (pp. 483–492). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Chess, S., & Shaw, A. (2015). A conspiracy of fishes, or, how we learned to stop worrying about# GamerGate and embrace hegemonic masculinity. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 59(1), 208–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cyber Civil Rights Initiative. (2018). Revenge Porn Laws. Retrieved from
  9. D’Ignazio, C. (2016). A primer on non-binary gender and big data. Retrieved from
  10. Daniels, J. (2009). Rethinking cyberfeminism(s): Race, gender, and embodiment. WSQ: Women’s Studies Quarterly, 37(1), 101–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dobson, A.S. (2015). Postfeminist digital cultures: Femininity, social media, and self-representation. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  12. Durham, A., Cooper, B. C., & Morris, S. M. (2013). The stage hip-hop feminism built: A new directions essay. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 38(3), 721–737.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Eisenstein, Z. (1998). Global obscenities: Patriarchy, capitalism, and the lure of cyberfantasy. New York: NYU Press.Google Scholar
  14. Everett, A. (2004). On cyberfeminism and cyberwomanism: High-tech mediations of feminism’s discontents. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 30(1), 1278–1286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fullagar, S., Pavlidis, A., & Francombe-Webb, J. (2018). Feminist theories after the post-structuralist turn. In D. C. Parry (Ed.), Feminisms in leisure studies: Advancing a fourth wave. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  16. Gajjala, R. (2003). South Asian digital diasporas and cyberfeminist webs: Negotiating globalization, nation, gender and information technology design. Contemporary South Asia, 12(1), 41–56. Scholar
  17. Garcia, S. E. (2017, October 20). The woman who created #MeToo long before hashtags. The New York Times. Retrieved from
  18. Goldin, I., & Kutarna, C. (2016). Age of discovery: Navigating the risks and rewards of our new renaissance. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.Google Scholar
  19. Harvey, A., & Shepherd, T. (2017). When passion isn’t enough: Gender, affect and credibility in digital games design. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 20(5), 492–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Howard, P. N., Duffy, A., Freelon, D., Hussain, M. M., Mari, W., & Mazaid, M. (2011). Opening closed regimes: What was the role of social media during the Arab spring? Available at SSRN 2595096.Google Scholar
  21. IdleNoMore. (2018). IdleNoMore: The story. Retrieved from
  22. Johnson, C. W., & Parry, D. C. (2016). Fostering social justice through qualitative inquiry: A methodological guide. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Jones, S., & Hughes-Decatur, H. (2012). Speaking of bodies in justice-oriented, feminist teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 63(1), 51–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Keller, J. (2016). Girls’ feminist blogging in a postfeminist age. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  25. Khondker, H. H. (2011). Role of the new media in the Arab spring. Globalizations, 8(5), 675–679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kimmel, M. S. (2013). Angry white men: American masculinity at the end of an era. New York: Nation Books.Google Scholar
  27. Lupton, D. (2016). Foreword: Lively devices, lively data and lively leisure studies. Leisure Studies, 35(6), 709–711. Scholar
  28. Lupton, D., & Thomas, G. M. (2015). Playing pregnancy: The ludification and gamification of expectant motherhood in smartphone apps. M/C Journal, (5), 18.Google Scholar
  29. Marwick, A. E. (2017). Scandal or sex crime? Gendered privacy and the celebrity nude photo leaks. Ethics and Information Technology, 19(3), 177–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Massanari, A. L. (2017). # Gamergate and the fappening: How Reddit’s algorithm, governance, and culture support toxic technocultures. New Media & Society, 19(3), 329–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. me too movement. (2018). me too. Retrieved from
  32. Mohrman, K., & Fischer, M. (2016). Black deaths matter? Sousveillance and the invisibility of black life. Ada: A Journal of Gender, New Media, and Technology, (10), 1–13.
  33. Morrison, A. (2014). Compositional strategies of conflict management in personal mommy blogs. Feminist Media Studies, 14(2), 286–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Noble, S. U. (2016). A future for intersectional black feminist technology studies. Scholar & Feminist Online, (13.3–14.1). Retrieved from
  35. Norris, P. (2001). Digital divide: Civic engagement, information poverty, and the internet worldwide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. O’Riordan, K. (2006). Gender, technology, and visual cyberculture. In D. Silver & A. L. Massanari (Eds.), Critical cyberculture Studies (pp. 243–256). New York: NYU Press.Google Scholar
  37. Pavlidis, A., & Fullagar, S. (2014). Women, sport and new media technologies: Derby grrrls online. In Bennett & Robards (Eds.), Mediated youth cultures (pp. 165–181). London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Retallack, H., Ringrose, J., & Lawrence, E. (2016). “Fuck your body image”: Teen girls’ twitter and Instagram feminism in and around school. In J. Coffey, S. Budgeon, & H. Cahill (Eds.), Learning bodies: The body in youth and childhood studies (pp. 85–103). Singapore: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Return of Kings. (2017). Return of kings: About. Retrieved from
  40. Rheingold, H. (1993). The virtual community: Finding connection in a computerized world. Reading, UK: Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing, Inc.Google Scholar
  41. Rich, E. (2018). Healthism, girls’ embodiment, and contemporary health and physical education: From weight management to digital practices of optimization. In L. Mansfield, J. Caudwell, B. Wheaton, & B. Watson (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of feminism and sport, Leisure and Physical Education (pp. 523–536). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Roberts, S. T. (2016). Commercial content moderation: Digital laborers’ dirty work. In S. U. Noble & B. Tynes (Eds.), The intersectional internet: Race, sex, class and culture online. New York: Peter Lang Publishing.Google Scholar
  43. Rose, J., & Spencer, C. (2016). Immaterial labour in spaces of leisure: Producing biopolitical subjectivities through Facebook. Leisure Studies, 35(6), 809–826.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Sassen, S. (2002). Towards a sociology of information technology. Current Sociology, 50(3), 365–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Schmitz, R. M., & Kazyak, E. (2016). Masculinities in cyberspace: An analysis of portrayals of manhood in men’s rights activist websites. Social Sciences, 5(2), 18. Scholar
  46. Shepherd, T. (2013). Gendering the commodity audience in social media. In C. Carter, L. Steiner, & L. McLaughlin (Eds.), The Routledge companion to media & gender (pp. 157–167). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  47. Singh, A. A., & Johnson, C. W. (2018). Using collective memory work to create safer schools for queer and trans students: A story of love, liberation, and transformation. In C. W. Johnson (Ed.), Collective memory work: A methodology for learning with and from ‘others’ (pp. 151–174). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  48. Smith-Prei, C., & Stehle, M. (2016). Awkward politics: Technologies of popfeminist activism. Montreal, QC: McGill-Queen’s press-MQUP.Google Scholar
  49. Spencer Schultz, C., & McKeown, J. K. L. (2018). Introduction to the special issue: Toward “digital leisure studies”. Leisure Sciences, 1–20.Google Scholar
  50. Spracklen, K. (2015). Digital leisure, the internet and popular culture: Communities and identities in a digital age. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Time’s Up. (2018). Time’s up: The clock has run out on sexual assault, harassment and inequality in the workplace. It’s time to do something about it. Retrieved from
  52. Turkle, S. (1996). Virtuality and its discontents searching for community in cyberspace. In J. Turow & A. L. Kavanaugh (Eds.), The wired homestead: An MIT press sourcebook on the internet and the family (pp. 385–402). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  53. United Nations. (2016). Human rights council thirty-second session agenda item 3 promotion and protection of all human rights, civil, political, economic, social and cultural rights, including the right to development. (No. A/HRC/32/L.20-1610802). New York: United Nations General Assembly, Human Rights Council. Retrieved from
  54. Wajcman, J. (2000). Reflections on gender and technology studies. Social Studies of Science, 30(3), 447–464. Scholar
  55. Wajcman, J. (2010). Feminist theories of technology. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 34(1), 143–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Warf, B., & Grimes, J. (1997). Counterhegemonic discourses and the internet. Geographical Review, 87(2), 259–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Whitson, J. R. (2014). Foucault’s fitbit: Governance and gamification. In S. P. Walz & S. Deterding (Eds.), Gameful world: Approaches, issues, applications (pp. 339–358). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  58. Williams, S. (2015). Digital defense: Black feminists resist violence with hashtag activism. Feminist Media Studies, 15(2), 341–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. YouTube. (2018). Bethany Mota: About. Retrieved from
  60. Zacharek, S., Dockterman, E., & Sweetland Edwards, H. (2017, December 18). The silence breakers: TIME person of the year 2017. Time Magazine. Retrieved from

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Diana C. Parry
    • 1
  • Luc S. Cousineau
    • 2
  • Corey W. Johnson
    • 2
  • Simone Fullagar
    • 3
  1. 1.University of WaterlooWaterlooCanada
  2. 2.Department of Recreation & Leisure StudiesUniversity of WaterlooWaterlooCanada
  3. 3.Department for HealthUniversity of BathBathUK

Personalised recommendations