Advertisement

Intelligent Oil Field Approach Using Virtual Reality and Mobile Anthropomorphic Robots

  • José E. Naranjo
  • Paulina X. Ayala
  • Santiago Altamirano
  • Geovanni Brito
  • Marcelo V. Garcia
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10851)

Abstract

The need to implement architectures with a high degree of scalability, a low level of error and the preservation of the integrity of human beings in the oil industry, has led to the development of technologies that use tele operation, in addition to graphic interfaces that reach a total immersion of the user. To achieve this, it is necessary to use tools such as augmented reality and virtual reality, which help to make the transparency of any system infinite. This research presents the design of a tele-operation system that allows periodic inspections of equipment, maintenance tasks, or training of new personnel in the Well-Pads located in Petroamazonas EP, Ecuador. The transmission of data has been made through the MQTT protocol in order to use the lowest possible bandwidth and consume few resources. In the local site several environments of augmented reality and virtual reality have been implemented, this allows to transmit the skill of the operator to the slave robot through the senses of kinesthesia, sight and hearing implementing an operation based on the concept of Intelligent Oil Field.

Keywords

Intelligent Oil Field Augmented reality Virtual reality Teleoperation Mobile manipulator 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was financed in part by Universidad Tecnica de Ambato (UTA) under project CONIN-P-0167-2017, by DPI2015-68602-R (MINECO/FEDER, UE), UPV/EHU under project PPG17/56 and GV/EJ under recognized research group IT914-16 and Government of Ecuador through grant SENESCYT-2013.

References

  1. 1.
    Shukla, A., Karki, H.: Application of robotics in onshore oil and gas industry-a review Part I. Rob. Auton. Syst. 75, 490–507 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Liaw, J., Tsai, P.: Target prediction to improve human errors in robot teleoperation system. In: 2017 International Conference on Applied System Innovation (ICASI), pp. 1094–1097. IEEE (2017)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Shukla, A., Karki, H.: Application of robotics in offshore oil and gas industry—a review Part II. Rob. Auton. Syst. 75, 508–524 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Tang, K., Wang, Y., Liu, H., Sheng, Y., Wang, X., Wei, Z.: Design and implementation of push notification system based on the MQTT protocol. In: Proceedings of 2013 International Conference on Information Science and Computer Applications (ISCA 2013), pp. 116–119 (2013)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Garcia, M.V., Irisarri, E., Perez, F., Estevez, E., Orive, D., Marcos, M.: Plant floor communications integration using a low cost CPPS architecture. In: 2016 IEEE 21st International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation (ETFA), pp. 1–4. IEEE (2016)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Milgram, P., Takemura, H., Utsumi, A., Kishino, F.: Augmented reality: a class of displays on the reality-virtuality continuum. In: Telemanipulator and Telepresence Technologies. International Society for Optics and Photonics, vol. 2351, pp. 282–293 (1995)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Regenbrecht, H., Baratoff, G., Wilke, W.: Augmented reality projects in the automotive and aerospace industries. IEEE Comput. Graph. Appl. 25(6), 48–56 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Reyes, F.: Robotica: Control de Robots Manipuladores, 1st edn. Alfaomega Grupo Editor, Mexico (2011)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    García, M.V., Irisarri, E., Pérez, F., Estévez, E., Marcos, M.: Automation architecture based on cyber physical systems for flexible manufacturing within Oil&Gas industry. Rev. Iberoam. Automática Informática Ind (RIAI), 15(2), 156–166 (2018). https://doi.org/10.4995/riai.2017.8823. Directory of Open Access JournalsCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Salcudean, S.E., Wong, N.M., Salcudean, S.E., Hollis, R.L., Wong, M., Hollis, R.L.: Design and control of a force-reflecting teleoperation system with magnetically levitated master and wrist. Robotics 11(6), 844–858 (1995)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Andaluz, V.H., Quevedo, W.X., Chicaiza, F.A., Varela, J., Gallardo, C., Sánchez, J.S., Arteaga, O.: Transparency of a bilateral tele-operation scheme of a mobile manipulator robot. In: De Paolis, L.T., Mongelli, A. (eds.) AVR 2016. LNCS, vol. 9768, pp. 228–245. Springer, Cham (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40621-3_18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Asaad, M., Ahmad, F., Alam, M.S., Rafat, Y.: IoT enabled monitoring of an optimized electric vehicle’s battery system. Mob. Netw. Appl. 1, 1–12 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11036-017-0957-z Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bandyopadhyay, S., Bhattacharyya, A.: Lightweight Internet protocols for web enablement of sensors using constrained gateway devices. In: 2013 International Conference on Computing Networking and Communications. (ICNC), pp. 334–340. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC (2013)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Handbook of Augmented Reality, Springer (2011)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Carmigniani, J., Furht, B., Anisetti, M., Ceravolo, P., Damiani, E., Ivkovic, M.: Augmented reality technologies, systems and applications. Multimed. Tools Appl. 51(1), 341–377 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Universidad Técnica de Ambato, UTAAmbatoEcuador
  2. 2.University of the Basque Country, UPV/EHUBilbaoSpain

Personalised recommendations