Institutional Framework for Conservation of Forest Genetic Resources in Serbia

  • Dragan NonićEmail author
  • Jelena Nedeljković
  • Marina Nonić
Part of the Advances in Global Change Research book series (AGLO, volume 65)


In this chapter is analysed the institutional framework for conservation of forest genetic resources (FGR) in Serbia, i.e. institutions and organizations responsible for this issue at the republic level. The results show that a number of institutions and organizations are involved in conservation work. The top institutions of public administration are the Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Water Management (through the work of the Directorate for Forests) and the Ministry of Environmental Protection (through the work of the Sector for Nature Protection and Climate Change). The public service for nature conservation is responsible for the support and control in the performance of professional activities. The public enterprise for state forests management and public enterprises for management of national parks, as well as other organizations, including non-governmental organizations, are responsible for the implementation of professional activities on FGR conservation. The work of educational and research institutions in relation to the conservation of FGR is done through different projects and programs, at the national and regional level. In most cases, the competencies of institutions and organizations do not relate exclusively to the FGR conservation but also include other activities. Conservation of FGR is a primary objective within the competence of public administration in forestry and nature conservation (competent ministries); public service in nature conservation; public enterprises in forestry and nature conservation; educational and research organizations. Bearing in mind a wide range of the institutional framework, it is necessary to build and implement a policy of cross-sectoral dialogue for successful implementation of FGR conservation activities. Although the conducted analysis did not show any no overlapping of the competencies of institutions and organizations, continuous cooperation and information exchange is necessary.


Institutions Organizations Forestry Genetic resources Serbia 



The research was financed by the project “Establishment of forest plantations to increase the afforested areas in Serbia” (TP 31041) and project “Studies of climate changes and their impact on the environment – monitoring impacts, adaptation and mitigation” (no. 43007), sub-project “Socio-economic development, mitigation and adaptation to climate change” (no. 43007/16-III), funded by the Ministry of education, science and technological development of the Republic of Serbia.


  1. Barata, A. M., Rocha, F., Lopes, V., & Carvalho, A. M. (2016). Conservation and sustainable uses of medicinal and aromatic plants genetic resources on the worldwide for human welfare. Industrial Crops and Products, 88, 8–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Dawson, I., Leakey, R., Clement, C., Weber, J., Cornelius, J., Roshetko, J., Vinceti, B., Kalinganire, A., Tchoundjeu, Z., Masters, E., & Jamnadass, R. (2014). The management of tree genetic resources and the livelihoods of rural communities in the tropics: Non-timber forest products, smallholder agroforestry practices and tree commodity crops. Forest Ecology and Management, 333, 9–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. FAO. (2014). Institutional framework for conservation and management of forest genetic resources. In The state of the world’s forest genetic resources (pp. 207–211). Commission on Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture – Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome.Google Scholar
  4. FAO. (2018). Organizational development of forestry institutions, FAO. Available online at:
  5. FB. (2017a). Biodiversity Information Center, Faculty of Biology, Belgrade. Available at:
  6. FB. (2017b). Chair of Ecology and Geography of Plants, Faculty of Biology, Belgrade. Available at:
  7. FD. (2016). Information about work scope (52 pp.). Ministry of agriculture and environmental protection-Forest Directorate, Belgrade.Google Scholar
  8. FOREST EUROPE. (2011). State of Europe’s Forests 2011 – Status and trends in sustainable forest management in Europe. Ministerial Conference on the Protection of Forests in Europe FOREST EUROPE, Liaison Unit Oslo, Oslo (341 pp.).Google Scholar
  9. Gane, M. (2007). Forest strategy-strategic management and sustainable development for the forest sector (414 pp.). Dordrecht: SpringerGoogle Scholar
  10. Geburek, T., & Konrad, H. (2008). Why the conservation of forest genetic resources has not worked. Conservation Biology, 22(2), 267–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Graudal, L.O.V., Kjær, E.D., Thomsen, A., & Larsen, B. (1997). Planning national programmes for conservation of forest genetic resources (Technical Note no. 48, 54 pp.). Danida Forest Seed Centre, Humlebaek.Google Scholar
  12. Hodgson, G. M. (2006). What are institutions? Journal of Economic Issues, 40(1), 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. IBISS. (2017). Department for Ecology, Institute for Biological Research “Siniša Stanković”, Beograd. Available at:
  14. IF. (2017a). Department of Genetics, Plant Breeding, Seed and Nursery Production – Research, Institute of Forestry, Belgrade. Available at:,51.
  15. IF. (2017b). Forest Protection Division – Research, Institute of Forestry, Belgrade. Available at:,61.
  16. IMGG. (2016). Development strategy of the Institute of Molecular Genetics and Genetic Engineering 2016–2026 (17 pp.). Institute of Molecular Genetics and Genetic Engineering, Belgrade.Google Scholar
  17. IMGG. (2017). Laboratory for Molecular Biology of Plants, Institute of Molecular Genetics and Genetic Engineering, Belgrade. Available at:
  18. INC. (2017). Information about the work scope (40 pp.). Belgrade: Institute for nature conservation of Serbia.Google Scholar
  19. Lalović, V. (2016). Basic elements of the conservation of forest genetic resources and their institutional-legal aspects, master thesis, University of Belgrade-Faculty of Forestry, Belgrade, (78 pp.).Google Scholar
  20. Maksimović, Z., Šijačić-Nikolić, M., Aleksić, P., & Sovilj, L. J. (2015). Seed sources in SE “Srbijašume” as a basis for conservation and directed utilization gene pool. Bulletin of the Faculty of Forestry, 111, 63–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. MEP. (2017). Sector for nature conservation and climate change. Ministry of Environmental Protection. Available at:
  22. Nonić, D. (2015). Organization and business administration in forestry, electronic source (380 pp.). Belgrade: University of Belgrade-Faculty of Forestry.Google Scholar
  23. Nonić, D., Avdibegović, M., & Krilašević, E. (2006). Institutional organization of forestry in Serbia. Naše šume, 6–7, 78–81.Google Scholar
  24. Nonić, D., Avdibegović, M., Nedeljković, J., Radosavljević, A., & Ranković, N. (2014). Sustainable governance in forestry and nature protection (pp. 113–140). Bulletin of the Faculty of Forestry, Special issue on the occasion of the conference: “Forests of Serbia and sustainable development”.Google Scholar
  25. North, D. (1994). Economic performance through time. The American Economic Review, 84(3), 359–368.Google Scholar
  26. OG. (2015). Law on National Parks, “Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia”, no. 84/15.Google Scholar
  27. Paul, M., Hinrichs, T., Janßen, A., Schmitt, H. P., Soppa, B., Stephan, B. R., & Dörflinger, H. (2010). Forest genetic resources in Germany: Concept for the conservation and sustainable utilization of forest genetic resources in the Federal Republic of Germany (76 pp.). Bonn: Federal Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Consumer Protection.Google Scholar
  28. Šijačić-Nikolić, M., Nonić, M., Lalović, V., Milovanović, J., Nedeljković, J., & Nonić, D. (2017). Conservation of forest genetic resources: Key stakeholders’ attitudes in forestry and nature protection. Genetika, 49(3), 875–890.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Srbijašume. (2018). Internal documentation about work tasks, public enterprise for state forest management. Belgrade: Srbijašume.Google Scholar
  30. Stamatović, S., Vukotić, M., & Nedeljković, J. (2013). Institutional framework and impact of environmental organizations on issues of woody biomass utilization for energy. Bulletin of the Faculty of Forestry, 108, 191–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. UNECE. (2005). European forest sector outlook study 1960–2000-2020 main report (Geneva Timber and Forest Study Paper 20, 235 pp). Geneva: UNECE.Google Scholar
  32. World Bank. (2005). Forest institutions in transitions: Experiences and lessons from Eastern Europe (PROFOR book number 4, 74 pp). Washington, DC: The World Bank.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dragan Nonić
    • 1
    Email author
  • Jelena Nedeljković
    • 1
  • Marina Nonić
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of ForestryUniversity of BelgradeBelgradeSerbia

Personalised recommendations