Advertisement

From Nature Conservation to Dynamic Genetic Conservation: The Hellenic Case

  • Paraskevi G. Alizoti
  • Filippos A. Aravanopoulos
Chapter
Part of the Advances in Global Change Research book series (AGLO, volume 65)

Abstract

The importance of the Hellenic ecosystems from a biodiversity point of view at all levels is presented. The value of the existing biodiversity and its significance has been recognized quite early and the first protected areas were designated at a national level in 1937. The protected areas designated ever since under national and regional (EU) legislation, as well as under international Conventions and their protection status is presented in detail. Most of the protected areas though, that cover almost one third of the country, have been designated mainly for nature conservation (ecosystem, species level) and not for conserving the species genetic resources, even if within the general protection framework they were also indirectly conserved. Focused activities aiming towards the dynamic conservation of forest tree species (maintenance of forest tree genetic diversity to ensure the evolutionary continued processes and not just the preservation of existing frequencies of genotypes and alleles) were initiated after the participation of the country in the EUFORGEN program and the EUFGIS project. Dynamic gene conservation units (GCUs) have been designated so far for a number of species, but the process of designation needs to be intensified, given the role of the country as a biodiversity hotspot and an area of high endemism.

Keywords

Biodiversity Forest genetic resources Dynamic genetic conservation Protected areas Gene Conservation Units (GCUs) 

References

  1. Alizoti, P. G. (2007). Conservation of forest genetic resources and climate change. Measures- perspectives-suggestions. In Proceedings of the 13th Conference of Hellenic Forestry Society. Kastoria, 7–10 October 2005, pp. 406–412.Google Scholar
  2. Alizoti, P. G. (2010, October 13–15). Forest ecosystems and genetic resources in a multiple changing environment: Risks-challenges-perspectives. In Proceedings of the 13th Conference of Hellenic Scientific Society for Plant Genetics and Breeding on ‘Genetic erosion’, Kalamata, p. 218.Google Scholar
  3. Alizoti, P. G. (2011). Human impact on forest genetic resources. In Proceedings of the 14th Conference of Hellenic Forestry Society. Patra, November 1–4, 2009, pp. 867–875.Google Scholar
  4. Aravanopoulos, F. A., Drouzas, A. D., & Alizoti, P. G. (2001). Electrophoretic and quantitative variation in chestnut (Castanea sativa Mill.) in Hellenic populations in old-growth natural and coppice stands. Forest Snow and Landscape Research, 76(3), 429–434.Google Scholar
  5. Blondel, J., & Aronson, J. (1999). Biology and wildlife of the Mediterranean region. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Conservation International, Biodiversity hotspots website https://www.conservation.org/How/Pages/Hotspots.aspx
  7. Dudley, N. (2008). Guidelines for applying protected area management categories. Gland: IUCN.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. European Commision. (2008). Natura 2000. Protecting Europe’s Biodiversity. European Commission. Directorate – General for Environment. Publ. Information Press, Oxford, U.K.Google Scholar
  9. FAO. (1975). Forest genetic resources information No. 4. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.Google Scholar
  10. FAO. (1989). Plant genetic resources: Their conservation in situ for human use. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.Google Scholar
  11. Friedman, S. (1997). Forest genetics for ecosystem management. In K. Kohm & J. F. Franklin (Eds.), Creating a forestry for the 21st century – the science of ecosystem management (pp. 203–212). Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
  12. Ganopoulos, I., Aravanopoulos, F. A., Argiriou, A., Kalivas, A., & Tsaftaris, A. (2011). Is the genetic diversity of small scattered forest tree populations at the southern limits of their range more prone to stochastic events? A wild cherry case study by microsatellite-based markers. Tree Genetics & Genomes, 7, 1299–1313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Geburek, T., & Turok, J. (2005). Conservation and sustainable management of forest genetic resources in Europe-an introduction. In: Conservation and sustainable management of forest genetic resources in Europe (pp. 3–9). Zvolen: Arbora Publishers.Google Scholar
  14. Hellenic Minstry of Environment. http://www.ypeka.gr/Default.aspx?tabid=433
  15. Hobbs, R. J., Richardson, D. M., & Davis, G. W. (1995). Mediterranean-type ecosystems: opportunities and constrains for studying the function of biodiversity. In G. W. Davis & D. M. Richardson (Eds.), Mediterranean-type ecosystems (pp. 1–42). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  16. IUCN (1994). Guidelines for protected areas management categories. IUCN-WCPA and WCMC, Gland.Google Scholar
  17. Koskela, J., Lefevre, F., Schueler, S., Kraigher, H., Olrik, D. C., Hubert, J., Longauer, R., Bozzano, M., Yrjana, L., Alizoti, P., Rotach, P., Vietto, L., Bordacs, S., Myking, T., Eysteinsson, T., Souvannavong, O., Fady, B., De Cuyper, B., Heinze, B., von Wuehlisch, G., Ducousso, A., & Ditlevsen, B. (2012). Translating conservation genetics into management: Pan-European minimum requirements for dynamic conservation units of forest tree genetic diversity. Biological Conservation, 157(1), 39–49.Google Scholar
  18. Ledig, F. T. (1986). Heterozygosity, heterosis, and fitness in outbreeding plants. In M. Soule (Ed.), Conservation biology – The science of scarcity and diversity (pp. 77–104). Sunderland: Sincauer.Google Scholar
  19. Lefevre, L., Koskela, J., Hubert, J., Kraiger, H., Longauer, R., Olrik, D. S., Schueler, S., Bozzano, M., Alizoti, P., Bakys, R., Baldwin, C., Bailian, D., Samuelsson, S. B., Bednarova, D., Bordacs, S., Collin, E., De Cuyper, B., De Vries, S., Eysteinsson, T., Frydl, J., Haverkamp, M., Ivankovic, M., Konrad, H., Koziol, C., Maaten, T., Notivol Paino, E., Ozturk, H., Pandeva, I. D., Parnuta, G., Pilipovic, A., Prostolache, D., Ryan, C., Steffenrem, A., Varela, M. C., Vessella, F., Volosyanchuk, R. T., Westergren, M., Wolter, F., Yrjana, L., & Zarina, I. (2012). Dynamic conservation of forest genetic resources in 33 European countries. Conservation Biology, 27(2), 373–384.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Morgante, M., Felice, N., & Vendramin, G. G. (1998). Analysis of hypervariable chloroplast microsatellites in Pinus Halepensis reveals a dramatic genetic bottleneck. In A. Karp, P. G. Isaac, & D. S. Ingram (Eds.), Molecular tools for screening biodiversity. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  21. Myers, N. (1988). Threatened biotas: “hot spots” in tropical forests. Environmentalist, 8, 187–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Myers, N., Mittermeier, R. A., Mittermeier, C. G., da Fonseca, G. A. B., & Kent, J. (2000). Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature, 403, 853–858.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Namkoong, G. (1997). A gene conservation plan for loblolly pine. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 27, 433–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Official Government Gazette – Hellenic Parliament. (2014). Approval of the national strategy for biodiversity for the years 2014–2029 and five years plan of action. FEK, 2383(B’), 29615–29734 (http://www.et.gr).Google Scholar
  25. Official Government Gazette – Hellenic Parliament. http://www.et.gr
  26. Ramanatha, V., & Hodgkin, T. (2002). Genetic diversity and conservation and utilization of plant genetic resources. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture, 68, 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ryder, O. A. (1986). Species conservation and systematics: The dilemma of subspecies. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 1, 9–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Shaffer, M. L. (1981). Minimum population sizes for species conservation. Bioscience, 31, 131–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Thomson, L., & Theilade, I. (2001). Protected areas and their role in conservation of forest genetic resources. In FAO, DFSC, IPGRI (Ed.), Forest genetic resources conservation and management. Vol. 2: In managed natural forests and protected areas (in situ). Rome: International Plant Genetic Resources Institute.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paraskevi G. Alizoti
    • 1
  • Filippos A. Aravanopoulos
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Forestry and Natural EnvironmentAristotle University of ThessalonikiThessalonikiGreece

Personalised recommendations