Advertisement

Preview of the Activities Related to In Situ Conservation of Forest Genetic Resources in Serbia

  • Vladan Popović
  • Aleksandar Lučić
Chapter
Part of the Advances in Global Change Research book series (AGLO, volume 65)

Abstract

The in situ (on-site) conservation implies the continuous maintenance of populations in the environment where they have naturally developed. The positive effect of the in situ conservation implies the preservation of the ecosystem as a whole and not only the individual species or genes that are the subject of the protection. The preservation of other plant and animal species inhabiting the preserved area can also be achieved by establishing the in situ conservation. Establishing in situ conservation in an area does not imply strict nature protection systems. The law permits the implementation of activities that will ensure durability and sustainability of genetic resources. The in situ is a desirable form of the conservation of the forest genetic resources because it allows the evolutionary processes to take place in the involved populations. The selection and registration of seed stands is the most commonly used form of the in situ conservation of the forest genetic resources in Serbia. This form of the conservation of the forest genetic resources is the most common and the only sustainable, because the funds allocated for conservation are modest. According to the data from the current Register of Seed Facilities of the Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Water Management of the Republic of Serbia – Forest Administration, 126 seed stands have been selected in Serbia on the total area of 1.842,89 ha, with 44 seed stands of coniferous, 81 stands of herbaceous species and 1 mixed seed stand. A total of 198 seed facilities for the production of the selected reproductive material and 312 seed facilities for the production of the reproductive material of known origin have been registered. The existing number of the seed facilities and the areas they cover are insufficient and do not reflect the richness of the gene pool of our country’s forest tree species to which a special attention should be given in the following period. Protected natural resources represent a significant form of the in situ conservation of forest genetic resources, because they contain large areas of forest complexes. The protected natural areas currently cover 575.310 ha, or 6.51% of the territory of Serbia. There are 461 protected natural areas (November 2015) which include: 5 national parks, 17 nature parks, 20 landscapes of extraordinary characteristics, 68 nature reserves, 3 protected habitats, 310 nature monuments, 38 areas of cultural and historical importance.

Keywords

In situ Conservation Genetic resources Serbia 

References

  1. FD. (2016). Directorate of forestry. http://www.mpzzs.gov.rs/registri-pumskih-semenskih-objekata/. Visited: January 25, 2016.
  2. INC. (2016). Institute for nature conservation of Serbia. http://www.zzps.rs/novo/index.php?jezik=sr&strana=zastita_prirode_osnovni_podaci. Visited: January 11, 2016.
  3. INC. (2016a). Institute for nature conservation of Serbia. http://www.zzps.rs/novo/index.php?jezik=sr&strana=zastita_prirode_zp_np_fruska_gora. Visited: January 13, 2016.
  4. INC. (2016b). Institute for nature conservation of Serbia. http://www.zzps.rs/novo/index.php?jezik=sr&strana=zastita_prirode_zp_np_kopaonik. Visited: January 13, 2016.
  5. INC. (2016c). Institute for nature conservation of Serbia. http://www.zzps.rs/novo/index.php?jezik=sr&strana=zastita_prirode_zp_np_tara. Visited:January 13, 2016.
  6. INC. (2016d). Institute for nature conservation of Serbia. http://www.zzps.rs/novo/index.php?jezik=sr&strana=zastita_prirode_zp_np_djerdap. Visited: January 13, 2016.
  7. INC. (2016e). Institute for nature conservation of Serbia. http://www.zzps.rs/novo/index.php?jezik=sr&strana=zastita_prirode_zp_np_sar_planina. Visited: January 13, 2016.
  8. Lakušić, D. (2001). Diversity of the ecosystem of Yugoslavia. Biodiversity and the new millennium (pp. 15–28). Society of Ecologists of Serbia, Institute for Nature Protection. (Original title: Diverzitet ekosistema Jugoslavije. Biodiverzitet i novi milenijum (pp. 15–28). Društvo ekologa Srbije, Zavod za zaštitu prirode). Google Scholar
  9. Lyngdoh, N., Joshi, G., Ravikanth, G., Vasudeva, R., & Shaanker, R. U. (2013). Changes in genetic diversity parameters in unimproved and improved populations of teak (Tectona grandis L.f.) in Karnataka state, India. Journal of Genetics, 92(1), 141–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Maksimović, Z., Šijačić-Nikolić, M., Aleksić, P., & Sovilj, Lj. (2015). Seed facilities in PE “Srbijašume” as a basis for conservation and directed use of gene pool (Bulletin of the Faculty of Forestry 111). University of Belgrade–Faculty of Forestry, Belgrade, 63–82 (Original title: Semenski objekti u JP „Srbijašume” kao osnova za konzervaciju i usmereno korišćenje genofonda, Glasnik Šumarskog fakulteta 111, Univerzitet u Beogradu-Šumarski fakultet, Beograd, 63–82).Google Scholar
  11. Mataruga, M., Daničić, V., & Cvjetković, B. (2010). Theoretical basis of the importance of implementing genetic ameliorations in the function of seed stand arrangements. Journal of Forestry, 62(3–4), 101–110 (Original title: Teorijske osnove značaja sprovođenja genetskih melioracija u funkciji uređenja sjemenskih sastojina. Šumarstvo, 62, 3–4, 101– 110).Google Scholar
  12. Medarević, M. (2005). Forest types in the National Park “Djerdap”, Faculty of Forestry, University of Belgrade, Ministry of Science and Environmental Protection of the Republic of Serbia and NP “Djerdap”, Belgrade, pp. 1–158. (Original title: Tipovi šuma nacionalnog parka “Đerdap”, Šumarski fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu, Ministarstvo za nauku i zaštitu Životne sredine Republike Srbije i NP “Đerdap”, Beograd, 1–158).Google Scholar
  13. OECD. (2014). Rules and regulations of the OECD forest seed and plant scheme.Google Scholar
  14. OG. (2004). Law on forest reproductive material, “Official Gazette of RS” Nos. 135/04, 8/05, 41/09.Google Scholar
  15. OG. (2010). Spatial plan of the Republic of Serbia, “Official Gazette of RS”, No. 88/10.Google Scholar
  16. Šijačić-Nikolić, M., Isajev, V., & Ivetić, V. (2006). National parks of Serbia–preservation and directed use of the forest tree gene pool. In Scientific conference: Management of forest ecosystems of National Parks and other protected areas, proceedings, Jahorina-NP Sutjeska, 5–8. July, 131–136. (Original title: Nacionalni parkovi Srbije – oblik očuvanja i usmerenog korišćenja genefonda šumskog drveća. Naučna konferencija: Gazdovanje šumskim ekosistemima nacionalnih parkova i drugih zaštićenih područja, Zbornik radova, Jahorina-NP Sutjeska, 5–8. jul, 131–136).Google Scholar
  17. Šijačić-Nikolić, M., Milovanović, J., & Nonić, M. (2014). Forest genetic resources in Serbia–condition and proposals for improvement of this field (Bulletin of the Faculty of Forestry special edition, pp. 51–70). Belgrade: University of Belgrade–Faculty of Forestry. (Original title: Šumski genetički resursi u Srbiji – stanje i predlozi za unapređenje ove oblasti, Glasnik Šumarskog fakulteta specijalno izdanje, Univerzitet u Beogradu–Šumarski fakultet, Beograd).Google Scholar
  18. Sivakumar, V., Gurudevsingh, B., Anandalakshmi, R., Warrier, R. R., Sekaran, S., Tigabu, M., & Odén, P. C. (2011). Culling phenotypically inferior trees in seed production area enhances seed and seedling quality of Acacia auriculiformis. Journal of Forestry Research, 22(1), 21–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of ForestryBelgradeSerbia

Personalised recommendations