Advertisement

Survey on Indoor Positioning Techniques and Systems

  • Habib Mohammed Hussien
  • Yalemzewed Negash Shiferaw
  • Negassa Basha Teshale
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering book series (LNICST, volume 244)

Abstract

Navigating different devices and human beings in indoor scene has become very crucial for number of tasks specially in automated system. The efficiency of outdoor positioning has become excellent due to the development of GPS. However lots of mass market applications require very excellent positioning capabilities in almost every environments. As a result, indoor positioning has attracted the researchers attention and has been a focus of research during the past decades. This paper presents an overview of the four typical indoor localization schemes namely triangulation, trilateration, proximity and scene analysis are analyze and discussed. Moreover it gives a detailed survey of different positioning systems which are being both research-oriented solutions and commercial products and also attempts to classify the different systems into different groups based on the technology used. We categorized all 11 sighted wireless indoor positioning systems into 6 distinct technologies namely Infrared signals, radio frequency, ultrasound waves, vision-based analysis, electromagnetic waves, and audible sound and explains the measuring principles of each. These approaches are characterized and their key performance parameters are quantified individually. For a better understanding, these parameters are briefly compared in table form for each system so as to outline the trade-offs from the viewpoint of a user.

Keywords

Indoor positioning systems Positioning techniques Wireless positioning technology Wireless localization 

References

  1. 1.
    Vossiek, M., Wiebking, L., Gulden, P., Wiehardt, J., Hoffmann, C., Heide, P.: Wireless local positioning. IEEE Microwave Mag. 4(4), 77–86 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hofmann, B., Wellinhof, H., Lichtenegger, H.: GPS: Theory and Practice. Springer, Vienna (1997)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Jarvis, R., Mason, A., Thorn hill, K., Zhang, B.: Indoor Positioning System, 29 August 2011Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    di Flora, C., Ficco, M., Russo, S., Vecchio, V.: Indoor and outdoor location based services for portable wireless devices. In: Proceedings of 25th IEEE International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems Workshops (2005)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Aitenbichler, E., Mhlhuser, M.: An IR local positioning system for smart items and devices. In: Proceedings of 23rd IEEE International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems Workshops (IWSAWC03) (2003)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Smailagic, A., Kogan, D.: Location sensing and privacy in a contextaware computing environment. IEEE Wirel. Commun. 9(5), 10–17 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Casas, R., Cuartielles, D., Marco, A., Gracia, H.J., Falc, J.L.: Hidden issues in deploying an indoor location system. 6(2), 62–69 (2007)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Want, R., Hopper, A., Falcao, V., Gibbons, J.: The active badge location system. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. 10(1), 91–102 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Firefly Motion Tracking System User’s guide (1999). http://www.gesturecentral.com/firefly/FireflyUserGuide.pdf
  10. 10.
  11. 11.
    Priyantha, N.B.: The cricket indoor location system. Ph.D. thesis, MIT (2005)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sonitor System Website (2008). http://www.sonitor.com/
  13. 13.
    Ekahau (2008). http://www.ekahau.com/
  14. 14.
    King, T., Kopf, S., Haenselmann, T., Lubberger, C., Effelsberg, W.: COMPASS: a probabilistic indoor positioning system based on 802.11 and digital compasses. In: Proceedings of First ACM International Workshop on Wireless Network Testbeds, Experimental evaluation and Characterization (WiNTECH), Los Angeles, CA, USA, September 2006Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ingram, S.J., Harmer, D., Quinlan, M.: UltraWideBand indoor positioning systems and their use in emergencies. In: Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Position Location and Navigation Symposium, pp. 706–715, April 2004Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ubisense (2008). http://www.ubisense.net
  17. 17.
  18. 18.
    Brumitt, B., Meyers, B., Krumm, J., Kern, A., Shafer, S.: EasyLiving: technologies for intelligent environments. In: Thomas, P., Gellersen, H.-W. (eds.) HUC 2000. LNCS, vol. 1927, pp. 12–29. Springer, Heidelberg (2000).  https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-39959-3_2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lopes, C.V., Haghighat, A., Mandal, A., Givargis, T., Baldi, P.: Localization of off-the-shelf mobile devices using audible sound: architectures, protocols and performance assessment. ACM SIGMOBILE Mob. Comput. Commun. Rev. 10(2), 38–50 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© ICST Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Habib Mohammed Hussien
    • 1
  • Yalemzewed Negash Shiferaw
    • 1
  • Negassa Basha Teshale
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Addis Ababa Institute of Technology (AAiT)Addis Ababa University (AAU)Addis AbabaEthiopia

Personalised recommendations