Advertisement

Adaptation or Non-adaptation?

  • Igor Popov
Chapter

Abstract

The adherents of directed evolution claimed that adaptation to the environment was not the main driving force of evolution. Their opponents either denied instances of inadaptive evolution or insisted that adaptive changes were by far more numerous and therefore evolution in general was the creation of adapted organisms. Orthogeneticists objected that seemingly adaptive organs first evolved independently of the environment and then an organism put them to use. In this way, organisms adapted to their own structure. The phenomenon of senescence is a remarkable example of non-adaptive nature of characters.

Keywords

Adaptation Preadaptation Panglossian paradigm Inadaptive evolution Senescence 

References

  1. Alberch P (1981) Convergence and parallelism in foot morphology in the Neotropical salamander genus Bolithoglossa. 1. Function. Evolution 35(1):8–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anisimov VN (2007) Melatonin. The role in the organism, the use in medicine (Melatonin. Rol’ v organizme, primenenie v meditsine). Sistema, St PetersburgGoogle Scholar
  3. Artamonova VS, Makhrov AA (2006) Uncontrolled genetic processes in artificially sustained populations: proof of the leading role of selection in evolution (Nekontroliruemye geneticheskie protsessy v iskusstvenno podderzhivaemykh populyatsiyakh: dokazatel’stvo vedushchey roli otbora v evolyutsii). Genetika 42(3):310–324PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Bejder L, Hall BK (2002) Limbs in whales and limblessness in other vertebrates: mechanisms of evolutionary and developmental transformation and loss. Evol Dev 4(6):445–458CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Berg LS (1977) Works on the theory of evolution (Trudy po teorii evolyutsii). Nauka, MoscowGoogle Scholar
  6. Bilak AT (1998) State of activitites on the recovery of Atlantic salmon stocks in Canada (Sostoyanie rabot po vosstanovleniyu zapasov atlanticheskogo lososya v Kanade). In: Kazakov RV (ed) Atlantic salmon (Atlanticheskiy losos’). Nauka, St Petersburg, pp 308–335Google Scholar
  7. Brunet-Rossinni AK, Austad SN (2004) Ageing studies on bats: a review. Biogerontology 5:211–222CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Calloman J (2002) Jurassic ammonites: real phylogeny in real time. In: The Lyell meeting: approaches to reconstructing phylogeny. The Geological Society, Burlington House, p 7Google Scholar
  9. Clark WR (2004) Reflections on an unsolved problem of biology: the evolution of senescence and death. Adv Gerontol 14:7–20PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Darwin (2009) Commemorations. http://darwin-online.org.uk/2009.html
  11. Davitashvili LSh (1948) The history of evolutionar palaeontology from Darwin to our days (Istoriya evolyutsionnoy paleontologii ot Darvina do nashikh dney). AN SSSR, Moscow, LeningradGoogle Scholar
  12. Donovan DT (1993) Ammonites in 1991. In: House MR (ed) The Ammonoidea: environment, ecology and evolutionary change. Systematics association special, vol 47. Clarendon Press, Oxford, pp 1–12Google Scholar
  13. Geoffroy Saint-Hilaire E (1829) A course of the natural history of mammals (Cours de l'histoire naturelle des mammifères). Pichon et Didier, ParisGoogle Scholar
  14. Gilchrist S, Azevedo RBR, Partridge L, O’Higgins P (2000) Adaptation and constraint in the evolution of Drosophila melanogaster wing shape. Evol Dev 2(2):114CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Goswami A (1999) Craseonycteris thonglongyai (on-line). Animal diversity web (Accessed June 29, 2009 at http:animaldiversity.ummz.umich.edu/site)
  16. Gould SJ, Lewontin RC (1979) The spandrels of san Marco and the Panglossian paradigm: a critique of the adaptationist program. Proc R Soc Lond B 205:581–598CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Hewit RA (1993) Relation of shell strength to evolution in the Ammonoidea. In: House MR (ed) The Ammonoidea: environment, ecology and evolutionary change. Systematics association special, vol 47. Clarendon Press, Oxford, pp 35–56Google Scholar
  18. Khritankov AM, Ovodov ND (2001) Concerning longevity of Brandt’s bats (Myotis brandtii Eversmann) in middle Siberia (O dolgozhitel’stve nochnits Brandta [Myotis brandtii Eversmann] v Sredney Sibiri). Plecotus et al 4: 20–24Google Scholar
  19. Levanidov VY, Levanidova IM (1957) Feeding of the young of the summer chum salmon and the pink salmon in tributaries of the Amur (Pitanie molodi letney kety i gorbushi v pritokakh Amura). Izvestiya Tikhookeanskogo nauchno-issledovatel’skogo instituta rybnogo khozyaystva i okeanografii 45:3–16Google Scholar
  20. Makrushin AV (2004) Evolutionary predecessors of oncogenesis and senile involution (Evolyutsionnye predshestvenniki onkogeneza i starcheskoi involyutsii). Uspekhi gerontologii 13:32–43PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Medawar PB (1952) An unsolved problem of biology. Lewis, LondonGoogle Scholar
  22. Nägeli C (1884) Mechanistic-physiological theory of evolutionary theory (Mechanischphysiologische Theorie der Abstammungslehre). Druck und Verlag von R. Oldenbourg, Munich and LeipzigGoogle Scholar
  23. Neger FW (1913) Biology of plants on experimental basis (bionomics) (Biologie der Pflanzen auf experimentelle Grundlage [Bionomie]). Stuttgart cited in berg LS (1977) works on the theory of evolution (Trudy po teorii evolyutsii). Nauka, MoscowGoogle Scholar
  24. Popov IY (2012) Distribution of various aging patterns in the system of the animal world. Adv Gerontol 2(1):1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Popov Iyu, Kovalev DN (2010) Obstoyatel’stva dolgozhitel’stva letuchikh myshey (v svyazi s materialami issledovaniy na territorii Sankt-Peterburga i Leningradskoy oblasti) (The circumstances of lonevity of bats) [in connection with the materials of studies in St Petersburg and the Leningrad Region]. Uspekhi gerontologii 23(2):179–185Google Scholar
  26. Robins JB, Abrey CA, Quinn TP, Rogers DE (2005) Lacustrine growth of juvenile pink salmon and a comparison with sympatric sockeye salmon. J Fish Biol 66:1671–1680CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Saunders WB, Ward PD (1987) Ecology, Distribution and Population Characteristics of Nautilus. In: Saunders WB, Landman NH (eds) Nautilus: The Biology and Paleobiology of a Living Fossil. Plenum press, New York, pp 137–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Serebrovsky PV (1928) Darwinism and the teaching about orthogenesis (Darvinizm i uchenie ob ortogeneze). In: Kozo-Polyansky BM (ed) The theory of nomogenesis. A new phase in the development of Russian anti-Darwinism. A collection of critical papers (Teoriya nomogeneza. Novaya faza v razvitii rossiyskogo antidarvinizma. Sbornik kriticheskikh statey). Izdatel’stvo Gosudarstvennogo timirhyazevskogo nauchno-issledovatel’skogo instituta, Moscow, pp 87–158Google Scholar
  29. Skulachev VP (1997) Ageing of an organism is a special biological function, not the result of a breakdown of an complex living system: a biochemical substantiation of Weismann’s hypothesis (Starenie organizma – osobaya biologicheskaya funktsiya, a ne rezul’tat polomki slozhnoy zhivoy sistemy: biokhimicheskoe obosnovanie gipotezy Veysmana). Biokhimiya 62(11):1394–1399Google Scholar
  30. Skulachev VP (2009) How to cancel the programme of ageing of the organism? (Kak otmenit’ programmu stareniya organizma?) Rossiiskiy khimicheskiy zhurnal 53: 125–140Google Scholar
  31. Sobolev DN (1924) The fundamentals of historical biogenetics (Nachala istoricheskoy biogenetiki). Gosudarstvennoe izdatel’stvo Ukrainy, SimferopolGoogle Scholar
  32. Takhtadzhyan AL (1991) Darwin and the modern theory of evolution (Darvin i sovremennaya teoriya evolyutsii). In: Russian edition: Darwin Ch (1991) The origin of species (Proiskhozhdenie vidov). Nauka, St Petersburg, pp 489–523Google Scholar
  33. Voltaire (1759) Candide, ou l’Optimisme. Cited in Voltaire (1877) Candide, ou l’optimisme. In: Œuvres complètes de Voltaire, 21, pp 175–179, GarnierGoogle Scholar
  34. Weismann A (1881) On the duration of life (Ueber die Dauer des Lebens). In: Tageblatt der Versammlung deutscher Naturforscher und Aerzte in Salzburg. Salzburg Jg, vol 54, pp 98–114Google Scholar
  35. Williams GC (1957) Pleiotropy, natural selection and the evolution of senescence. Evolution 11:398–411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Willis JС (1940) The course of evolution by differentiation or divergent mutation rather than by selection. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Igor Popov
    • 1
  1. 1.Saint Petersburg State University, N. N. Petrov Research Institute of OncologySaint PetersburgRussia

Personalised recommendations