Advertisement

Cross-Border Cooperation in the European Context: Evidence from Regional Cooperation Initiatives

  • Casimir LorenzEmail author
  • Jonas Egerer
  • Clemens Gerbaulet
Chapter

Abstract

Cross-border cooperation on energy policies is crucial for achieving the ambitious goals of the low-carbon transformation in Europe and the energiewende in Germany. Because the European electricity system is so densely interconnected, reform processes in one country affect the broader European market, whether through price effects, cross-border flows, or the sharing of backup capacity. Countries engaged in cross-border cooperation face the transaction costs of implementing new regulatory regimes and sometimes significant distributional effects. Spillover effects of investments in one country can be either positive or negative for neighboring countries. At the beginning of the low-carbon transformation process, Europe-wide coordination was the main driver of development, whereas today, regional cooperation among several neighboring countries plays an important role, and there are also cases of bilateral cooperation between countries over national energy policies. In this chapter, we analyze different forms of cooperation in the context of the European low-carbon transformation process and provide empirical evidence on some concrete cooperation schemes. The chapter focuses on regional cooperation schemes, as these provide plentiful evidence of developments and progress to date. Section 12.2 discusses potential fields of cooperation and specifies our classification of cooperation types. Section 12.3 focuses on the potential scope of regional cooperation in the electricity sector, and describes existing examples of cooperation, such as the Pentalateral Energy Forum (PLEF) and the North and Baltic Sea Grid Initiatives. Sections 12.4 and 12.5 provide model-based analysis of the concrete effects of regional cooperation: joint balancing markets in the Alpine region, and transmission expansion in the North and Baltic Sea Region. Section 12.6 draws lessons from the analysis and concludes.

Keywords

Europe Cooperation Regions Nations Alpine region North Sea Welfare Electricity transmission Market design 

References

  1. BMWi. 2012. Germany, Austria and Switzerland start an initiative to promote pumped storage power plants. Press Release. Berlin, Germany.Google Scholar
  2. ———. 2015. Joint declaration for regional cooperation on security of electricity supply in the framework of the internal energy market. Berlin.Google Scholar
  3. De Decker, Jan, and Paul Kreutzkamp. 2011. Offshore electricity grid infrastructure in Europe – Final Report. Brussels, Belgium.Google Scholar
  4. De Jong, Jacques, and Christian Egenhofer. 2014. Exploring a regional approach to EU energy policies. CEPS Special Report 84. Brussels, Belgium.Google Scholar
  5. Ea, DTU, and DIW. 2015. Increased integration of the nordic and German electricity systems (full version). Study on behalf of Agora Energiewende and Global Utmaning. Berlin, Germany: Agora Energiewende.Google Scholar
  6. EC. 2010. Energy infrastructure priorities for 2020 and beyond – a blueprint for an integrated European energy network. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions COM(2010) 677/4. Brussels, Belgium: European Commission.Google Scholar
  7. ECF. 2011. Power Perspectives 2030 – On the Road to a Decarbonised Power Sector. Brussels, Belgium: European Climate Foundation.Google Scholar
  8. Egerer, Jonas, Friedrich Kunz, and Christian von Hirschhausen. 2013. Development scenarios for the north and baltic seas grid – a welfare economic analysis. Utilities Policy 27 (December): 123–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Egerer, Jonas, Christian von Hirschhausen, and Alexander Zerrahn. 2015. Increased integration of the nordic and German electricity systems. Distributional effects of system integration and qualitative discussion of implications for stakeholders – work package 2. Study on behalf of Agora Energiewende and Global Utmaning. Berlin, Germany.Google Scholar
  10. Egerer, Jonas, Clemens Gerbaulet, and Casimir Lorenz. 2016. European electricity grid infrastructure expansion in a 2050 context. The Energy Journal 37 (1): 101–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. ENTSO-E. 2016a. Regional cooperation and governance in the electricity sector. Policy Paper. Brussels, Belgium.Google Scholar
  12. ———. 2016b. Specific regional groups for the TYNDP. The ten-year network development plan – general. May 20, 2016.Google Scholar
  13. EWEA. 2009. Integrating wind – developing Europe’s power market for the large-scale integration of wind power. Final Report. Brussels, Belgium: European Wind Energy Association (EWEA).Google Scholar
  14. Fattler, Steffen, and Christoph Pellinger. 2015. Auswertungen und Analysen zur International Grid Control Cooperation. Vienna, Austria. https://www.ffe.de/download/article/549/20150211_Langfassung_IGCC_IEWT.pdf
  15. Gebrekiros, Yonas, Gerard Doorman, Stefan Jaehnert, and Hossein Farahmand. 2015. Reserve procurement and transmission capacity reservation in the Northern European power market. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems 67 (May): 546–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gerbaulet, C., and A. Weber. 2018. When regulators do not agree: are merchant interconnectors an option? Insights from an analysis of options for network expansion in the Baltic Sea Region. Energy Policy 117 (June): 228–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gerbaulet, Clemens, Casimir Lorenz, Julia Rechlitz, and Tim Hainbach. 2014. Regional cooperation potentials in the European context: survey and case study evidence from the Alpine Region. Economics of Energy & Environmental Policy 3 (2): 45–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Horstmann, Theo, and Klaus Kleinekorte. 2003. Strom für Europa: 75 Jahre RWE-Hauptschaltleitung Brauweiler 1928–2003/Power for Europe: 75 Years of the Brauweiler Control Centre 1928–2003. Essen, Germany: Klartext.Google Scholar
  19. Hughes, Thomas Parke. 1993. Networks of POWER: Electrification in Western Society, 1880–1930. Baltimore, USA: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Leuthold, Florian, Hannes Weigt, and Christian von Hirschhausen. 2012. A large-scale spatial optimization model of the European electricity market. Networks and Spatial Economics 12 (1): 75–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lorenz, Casimir, and Clemens Gerbaulet. 2014. New cross-border electricity balancing arrangements in Europe. Discussion Paper 1400. Berlin, Germany: DIW Berlin.Google Scholar
  22. Meeus, Leonardo, Manfred Hafner, Isabel Azevedo, Claudio Marcantonini, and Jean-Michel Glachant. 2011. Transition towards a low carbon energy system by 2050: what role for the EU? Final Report 3. THINK Project. European University Institute.Google Scholar
  23. Midttun, Atle, Tiina Ruohonen, and Raffaele Piria. 2012. Norway and the North Sea Grid. Key positions and players in Norway, from a Norwegian perspective. SEFEP Working Paper. Berlin, Germany: SEFEP, the Smart Energy for Europe Platform.Google Scholar
  24. Newbery, David, Goran Strbac, D. Pudjianto, and Pierre Noël. 2013. Benefits of an integrated European energy market. Final Report, Prepared for: Directorate – General Energy, European Commission.Google Scholar
  25. PLEF. 2007. Memorandum of understanding of the pentalateral energy forum on market coupling and security of supply in Central Western Europe. Luxembourg.Google Scholar
  26. ———. 2015. Generation adequacy assessment. Pentalateral energy forum support group 2. Brussels, Belgium: Pentalateral Energy Forum.Google Scholar
  27. Schnug, Artur, and Lutz Fleischer. 1999. Bausteine für Stromeuropa: Eine Chronik des elektrischen Verbunds in Deutschland; 50 Jahre Deutsche Verbundgesellschaft. Heidelberg, Germany: Deutsche Verbundgesellschaft.Google Scholar
  28. Sprey, Jens, Tim Drees, Denis vom Stein, and Albert Moser. 2015. Potential einer Harmonisierung der europäischen Regelleistungsmärkte. In. Vienna, Austria: 9. Internationale Energiewirtschaftstagung an der TU Wien.Google Scholar
  29. von Hirschhausen, Christian. 2012. Green electricity investment in Europe: development scenarios for generation and transmission investments – study for the European Investment Bank. EIB Working Papers 2012/04. Luxembourg: European Investment Bank.Google Scholar
  30. Weber, Alexander, Dietmar Graeber, and Andreas Semmig. 2010. Market coupling and the CWE project. Zeitschrift Für Energiewirtschaft 34 (4): 303–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Weber, Alexander, Thorsten Beckers, Sebastian Feuß, Christian von Hirschhausen, Albert Hoffrichter, and Daniel Weber. 2014. Potentiale zur Erzielung von Deckungsbeiträgen für Pumpspeicherkraftwerke in der Schweiz, Österreich und Deutschland. Study commissioned by the Swiss Federal Office of Energy SFOE. Berlin, Germany: TU Berlin, IAEW RWTH Aachen.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Casimir Lorenz
    • 1
    • 3
    Email author
  • Jonas Egerer
    • 2
  • Clemens Gerbaulet
    • 3
    • 1
  1. 1.DIW BerlinBerlinGermany
  2. 2.Friedrich-Alexander-Universität (FAU)Erlangen, NürnbergGermany
  3. 3.TU BerlinBerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations