Advertisement

The Gene Pool Concept Applied to Crop Wild Relatives: An Evolutionary Perspective

  • Richard E. Miller
  • Colin K. Khoury

Abstract

Crop wild relatives (CWR) can provide important resources for the genetic improvement of cultivated species. Because crops are often related to many wild species and because exploration of CWR for useful traits can take many years and substantial resources, the categorization of CWR based on a comprehensive assessment of their potential for use is an important knowledge foundation for breeding programs. The initial approach for categorizing CWR was based on crossing studies to empirically establish which species were interfertile with the crop. The foundational concept of distinct gene pools published almost 50 years ago was developed from these observations. However, the task of experimentally assessing all potential CWR proved too vast; therefore, proxies based on phylogenetic and other advanced scientific information have been explored. A current major approach to categorize CWR aims to comprehensively synthesize experimental data, taxonomic information, and phylogenetic studies. This approach very often ends up relying not only on the synthesis of data but also intuition and expert opinion and is therefore difficult to apply widely in a reproducible manner. Here, we explore the potential for a stronger standardization of the categorization method, with focus on evolutionary relationships among species combined with information on patterns of interfertility between species. Evolutionary relationships can be revealed with increasing resolution via next-generation sequencing, through the application of the multispecies coalescent model and using focused analyses on species discovery and delimitation that bridge population genetics and phylogenetics fields. Evolutionary studies of reproductive isolation can inform the understanding of patterns of interfertility in plants. For CWR, prezygotic postpollination reproductive barriers and intrinsic postzygotic barriers are the most important factors and determine the probability of producing viable and fertile offspring. To further the assessment of CWR for use in plant breeding, we present observed and predicted gene pool indices. The observed index quantifies patterns of interfertility based on fertilization success, seed production, offspring viability, and hybrid fertility. The predicted gene pool index requires further development of the understanding of quantitative and qualitative relationships between reproductive barriers, measures of genetic relatedness, and other relevant characteristics for crops and their wild relatives.

Keywords

Multispecies coalescent model Postzygotic reproductive barriers Reproductive isolation Solanaceae Species delimitation Targeted gene capture Unified species concept 

References

  1. Acquadro A, Barchi L, Gramazio P, Portis E, Vilanova S, Comino C, Plazas M, Prohens J, Lanteri S (2017) Coding SNPs analysis highlights genetic relationships and evolution pattern in eggplant complexes. PLoS One 12:e0180774CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Albert VA, Barbazuk WB, Der JP, Leebens-Mack J, Ma H, Palmer JD, Rounsley S et al (2013) The Amborella genome and the evolution of flowering plants. Science 342:1241089CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aubriot X, Paramjit S, Knapp S (2016) Tropical Asian species show that the old world clade of ‘spiny solanums’ (Solanum subgenus Leptostemonum pro parte: Solanaceae) is not monophyletic. Bot J Linn Soc 181:199–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Austin DF (1978) The Ipomoea batatas complex-I. Taxonomy. Bull Torrey Bot Club 1:114–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Austin DF (1997) Dissolution of Ipomoea series Anisomerae (Convolvulaceae). Taxon 28:359–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Baack E, Melo MC, Rieseberg LH, Ortiz-Barrientos D (2015) The origins of reproductive isolation in plants. New Phytol 207:968–984CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Barrett CF, Freudenstein JV (2011) An integrative approach to delimiting species in a rare but widespread mycoheterotrophic orchid. Mol Ecol 20:2771–2786CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Bohs L (1991) Crossing studies in Cyphomandra (Solanaceae) and their systematic and evolutionary significance. Am J Bot 78:1683–1693CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bredeson JV, Lyons JB, Prochnik SE, Wu GA, Ha CM, Edsinger-Gonzales E, Grimwood J, Schmutz J, Rabbi IY, Egesi C, Nauluvula P (2016) Sequencing wild and cultivated cassava and related species reveals extensive interspecific hybridization and genetic diversity. Nat Biotechnol 34:562–570CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Brozynska M, Furtado A, Henry RJ (2016) Genomics of crop wild relatives: expanding the gene pool for crop improvement. Plant Biotechnol J 14:1070–1085CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Buddenhagen C, Lemmon AR, Lemmon EM, Bruhl J, Cappa J, Clement WL, Donoghue M et al. (2016) Anchored phylogenomics of angiosperms I: assessing the robustness of phylogenetic estimates. bioRxiv:086298Google Scholar
  12. Carstens BC, Pelletier TA, Reid NM, Satler JD (2013) How to fail at species delimitation. Mol Ecol 22:369–4383Google Scholar
  13. Chen Z, Zhao N, Li S, Grover CE, Nie H, Wendel JF, Hua J (2017) Plant mitochondrial genome evolution and cytoplasmic male sterility. Crit Rev Plant Sci 36:55–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Comer JR, Zomlefer WB, Barrett CF, Stevenson DW, Heyduk K, Leebens-Mack JH (2016) Nuclear phylogenomics of the palm subfamily Arecoideae (Arecaceae). Mol Phylogenet Evol 97:32–42CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Coyne JA, Orr HA (1989) Patterns of speciation in Drosophila. Evolution 43:362–381CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Coyne JA, Orr HA (1997) Patterns of speciation in Drosophila revisited. Evolution 51:295CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Coyne JA, Orr HA (1998) The evolutionary genetics of speciation. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 353:287–305CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. De Queiroz K (2005) Ernst Mayr and the modern concept of species. Proc Natl Acad Sci 102:6600–6607CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. De Queiroz K (2007) Species concepts and species delimitation. Syst Biol 56:879–886CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Degnan JH, Rosenberg NA (2009) Gene tree discordance, phylogenetic inference and the multispecies coalescent. Trends Ecol Evol 24:332–340CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Dempewolf H, Eastwood RJ, Guarino L, Khoury CK, Müller JV, Toll J (2014) Adapting agriculture to climate change: a global initiative to collect, conserve, and use crop wild relatives. Agroecol Sust Food 38:369–377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Diaz J, Schmiediche P, Austin DF (1996) Polygon of crossability between eleven species of Ipomoea: section Batatas (Convolvulaceae). Euphytica 88:189–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Donoghue MJ (1985) A critique of the biological species concept and recommendations for a phylogenetic alternative. Bryologist 88:172–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Duarte JM, Wall PK, Edger PP, Landherr LL, Ma H, Pires PK, Leebens-Mack J (2010) Identification of shared single copy nuclear genes in Arabidopsis, Populus, Vitis and Oryza and their phylogenetic utility across various taxonomic levels. BMC Evol Biol 10:61CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. Duncan TM, Rausher MD (2013a) Evolution of the selfing syndrome in Ipomoea. Front Plant Sci 4:301CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Duncan TM, Rausher MD (2013b) Morphological and genetic differentiation and reproductive isolation among closely related taxa in the Ipomoea series Batatas. Am J Bot 100:2183–2193CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Edwards SV (2009) Is a new and general theory of molecular systematics emerging? Evolution 63:1–19CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Ellstrand NC, Prentice HC, Hancock JF (1999) Gene flow and introgression from domesticated plants into their wild relatives. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 30:539–563CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Eserman LA (2012) Taxonomy and crossing relationships in a small group of morning glories (Ipomoea section Pharbitis). Master thesis, Southeastern Louisiana UniversityGoogle Scholar
  30. Evanno G, Regnaut S, Goudet J (2005) Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software STRUCTURE: a simulation study. Mol Ecol 14:2611–2620CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Faircloth BC, McCormack JE, Crawford NG, Harvey MG, Brumfield RT, Glenn TC (2012) Ultraconserved elements anchor thousands of genetic markers spanning multiple evolutionary timescales. Syst Biol 61:717–726CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Falush D, Stephens M, Pritchard JK (2003) Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data: linked loci and correlated allele frequencies. Genetics 164:1567–1587PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  33. Fujita MK, Leaché AD, Burbrink FT, McGuire JA, Moritz C (2012) Coalescent-based species delimitation in an integrative taxonomy. Trends Ecol Evol 27:480–488CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Grant V (1981) Plant speciation. Columbia University, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  35. Grover CE, Gallagher JP, Jareczek JJ, Page JT, Udall JA, Gore MA, Wendel JF (2015) Reevaluating the phylogeny of allopolyploid Gossypium L. Mol Phylogenet Evol 92:45–52CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Hajjar R, Hodgkin T (2007) The use of wild relatives in crop improvement: a survey of developments over the last 20 years. Euphytica 156:1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hardigan MA, Bamberg J, Buell CR, Douches DS (2015) Taxonomy and genetic differentiation among wild and cultivated germplasm of Solanum sect. Petota. Plant Genome 8:1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Harlan JR, De Wet JMJ (1971) Toward a rational classification of cultivated plants. Taxon 20:509–517CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Heled J, Drummond AJ (2010) Bayesian inference of species trees from multilocus data. Mol Biol Evol 27:570–580CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Hey J (2006) On the failure of modern species concepts. Trends Ecol Evol 21:447–450CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Heyduk K, Trapnell DW, Barrett CF, Leebens-Mack J (2015) Phylogenomic analyses of species relationships in the genus Sabal (Arecaceae) using targeted sequence capture. Biol J Linn Soc 117:106–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Heyduk K, Stephens JD, Faircloth BC, Glenn TC (2016) Targeted DNA region re-sequencing. In: Field Guidelines for Genetic Experimental Designs in High-Throughput Sequencing. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 43–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Hirsch CD, Evans J, Buell CR, Hirsch CN (2014) Reduced representation approaches to interrogate genome diversity in large repetitive plant genomes. Brief Funct Genomics 13:257–267CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Hubisz MJ, Falush D, Stephens M, Pritchard JK (2009) Inferring weak population structure with the assistance of sample group information. Mol Ecol Resour 9:1322–1332CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  45. International Wheat Genome Sequencing Consortium (2014) A chromosome-based draft sequence of the hexaploid bread wheat (Triticum aestivum) genome. Science 345:1251788CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Jansky S (2006) Overcoming hybridization barriers in potato. Plant Breed 125:1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Kay KM, Reeves PA, Olmstead RG, Schemske DW (2005) Rapid speciation and the evolution of hummingbird pollination in neotropical Costus subgenus Costus (Costaceae): evidence from nrDNA ITS and ETS sequences. Am J Bot 92:1899–1910CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Khoury CK, Heider B, Castañeda-Álvarez NP, Achicanoy HA, Sosa CC, Miller RE, Scotland RW, Wood JR, Rossel G, Eserman LA, Jarret RL (2015) Distributions, ex situ conservation priorities, and genetic resource potential of crop wild relatives of sweet potato [Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam., I. series Batatas]. Frontiers in. Plant Sci 6:251Google Scholar
  49. Kostyun JL, Moyle LC (2017) Multiple strong postmating and intrinsic postzygotic reproductive barriers isolate florally diverse species of Jaltomata (Solanaceae). Evolution 6:1556–1571CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Lafon-Placette C, Köhler C (2016) Endosperm-based postzygotic hybridization barriers: developmental mechanisms and evolutionary drivers. Mol Ecol 25:2620–2629CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Lemmon EM, Lemmon AR (2013) High-throughput genomic data in systematics and phylogenetics. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 44:99–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Lerner HRL, Mindell DP (2005) Phylogeny of eagles, old world vultures, and other Accipitridae based on nuclear and mitochondrial DNA. Mol Phylogenet Evol 37:327–346CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Levin DA (1979) The nature of plant species. Science 204:381–384CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Levin RA, Myers NR, Bohs L (2006) Phylogenetic relationships among the “spiny solanums” (Solanum subgenus Leptostemonum, Solanaceae). Am J Bot 93:157–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Liu L, Yu L, Pearl DK, Edwards SV (2009) Estimating species phylogenies using coalescence times among sequences. Syst Biol 58:468–477CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Liu L, Yu L, Edwards SV (2010) A maximum pseudo-likelihood approach for estimating species trees under the coalescent model. BMC Evol Biol 10:302CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  57. Liu L, Wu S, Yu L (2015) Coalescent methods for estimating species trees from phylogenomic data. J Syst Evol 53:380–390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Lowry DB, Modliszewski JL, Wright KM, Wu CA, Willis JH (2008) The strength and genetic basis of reproductive isolating barriers in flowering plants. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences 363:3009–3021CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Luckow M (1995) Species concepts: assumptions, methods, and applications. Syst Bot 20:589–605CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Mandel JR, Dikow RB, Funk VA, Masalia RR, Staton SE, Kozik A, Michelmore RW, Rieseberg LH, Burke JM (2014) A target enrichment method for gathering phylogenetic information from hundreds of loci: an example from the Compositae. Applications in Plant Sciences 2:1300085CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Martin NH, Willis JH (2007) Ecological divergence associated with mating system causes nearly complete reproductive isolation between sympatric Mimulus species. Evolution 61:68–82CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Mascher M, Richmond TA, Gerhardt DJ, Himmelbach A, Clissold L, Sampath D, Ayling S et al (2013) Barley whole exome capture: a tool for genomic research in the genus Hordeum and beyond. Plant J 76:494–505CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  63. Maxted N, Ford-Lloyd BV, Jury S, Kell S, Scholten M (2006) Towards a definition of a crop wild relative. Biodivers Conserv 15:2673–2685CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Mayr E (1942) Systematics and the Origin of Species. Columbia University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  65. McCormack JE, Hird SM, Zellmer AJ, Carstens BC, Brumfield RT (2013) Applications of next-generation sequencing to phylogeography and phylogenetics. Mol Phylogenet Evol 66:526–538CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Mendelson TC (2003) Sexual isolation evolves faster than hybrid inviability in a diverse and sexually dimorphic genus of fish (Percidae:Etheostoma). Evolution 57:317–327CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Mirarab S, Warnow T (2015) ASTRAL-II: coalescent-based species tree estimation with many hundreds of taxa and thousands of genes. Bioinformatics 31:i44–i52CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  68. Morrell PL, Buckler ES, Ross-Ibarra J (2012) Crop genomics: advances and applications. Nat Rev Genet 13:85–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Moyle LC, Olson MS, Tiffin P (2004) Patterns of reproductive isolation in three angiosperm genera. Evolution 58:1195–1208CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. Nordborg M (2001) Coalescent theory. Handbook of Statistical Genetics, John Wiley and Sons, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  71. O’Meara BC (2009) New heuristic methods for joint species delimitation and species tree inference. Syst Biol 59:59–73CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  72. Pease JB, Guerrero RF, Sherman NA, Hahn MW, Moyle LC (2016) Molecular mechanisms of postmating prezygotic reproductive isolation uncovered by transcriptome analysis. Mol Ecol 25:2592–2608CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. Petit RJ, Excoffier L (2009) Gene flow and species delimitation. Trends Ecol Evol 24:386–393CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. Plazas M, Vilanova S, Gramazio P, Rodríguez-Burruezo A, Fita A, Herraiz FJ, Ranil R, Fonseka R, Niran L, Fonseka H, Kouassi B (2016) Interspecific hybridization between eggplant and wild relatives from different genepools. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 141:34–44Google Scholar
  75. Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P (2000) Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155:945–959PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  76. Prohens J, Gramazio P, Plazas M, Dempewolf H, Kilian B, Díez MJ, Fita A et al (2017) Introgressiomics: a new approach for using crop wild relatives in breeding for adaptation to climate change. Euphytica 213:158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Raj A, Stephens M, Pritchard JK (2014) fastSTRUCTURE: variational inference of population structure in large SNP data sets. Genetics 197:573–589CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  78. Rannala B, Yang Z (2017) Efficient Bayesian species tree inference under the multispecies coalescent. Syst Biol 66:823–842Google Scholar
  79. Rieseberg LH, Willis JH (2007) Plant speciation. Science 317:910–914CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  80. Rieseberg LH, Kim SC, Randell RA, Whitney KD, Gross BL, Lexer C, Clay K (2007) Hybridization and the colonization of novel habitats by annual sunflowers. Genetica 129:149–165CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. Rosenberg NA, Nordborg M (2002) Genealogical trees, coalescent theory and the analysis of genetic polymorphisms. Nat Rev Genet 3:380–390CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. Small E (1984) Hybridization in the domesticated-weed-wild complex. In: Grant WF (ed) Plant biosystematics. Academic Press, Toronto, pp 195–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Smith SD, Baum DA (2007) Systematics of Iochrominae (Solanaceae): patterns in floral diversity and interspecific crossability. Acta Hortic 745:241–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Soltis DE, Gitzendanner MA, Stull G, Chester M, Chanderbali A, Chamala S, Jordon-Thaden I, Soltis PS, Schnable PS, Barbazuk WB (2013) The potential of genomics in plant systematics. Taxon 62:886–898CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Stebbins GL (1950) Variation and evolution in plants. Columbia Biological Series, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  86. The Arabidopsis Genome Initiative (2000) Analysis of the genome sequence of the flowering plant Arabidopsis thaliana. Nature 408:796–815CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Tiffin P, Olson MS, Moyle LC (2001) Asymmetrical crossing barriers in angiosperms. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 268:861–867CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Turelli M, Moyle LC (2007) Asymmetric postmating isolation: Darwin's corollary to Haldane's rule. Genetics 176:1059–1088CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  89. Verdcourt B (1963) Convolvulaceae. In: Hubbard CE, Readhead E (eds) Flora of Tropical East Africa. Whitefriars Press, London, pp 1–161Google Scholar
  90. Vincent H, Wiersema J, Kell S, Fielder H, Dobbie S, Castañeda-Álvarez NP, Guarino L, Eastwood R, Leόn B, Maxted N (2013) A prioritized crop wild relative inventory to help underpin global food security. Biol Conserv 167:265–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Vorontsova MS, Stern S, Bohs L, Knapp S (2013) African spiny Solanum (subgenus Leptostemonum, Solanaceae): a thorny phylogenetic tangle. Bot J Linn Soc 173:176–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Wakeley J (2009) Coalescent theory: an introduction. Roberts and Company, Greenwood VillageGoogle Scholar
  93. Wakeley J (2013) Coalescent theory has many new branches. Theor Popul Biol 87:1CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  94. Weese TL, Bohs L (2007) A three-gene phylogeny of the genus Solanum (Solanaceae). Syst Bot 32:445–463CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Weitemier K, Straub SC, Cronn RC, Fishbein M, Schmickl R, McDonnell A, Liston A (2014) Hyb-Seq: combining target enrichment and genome skimming for plant phylogenomics. Appl Plant Sci 2:1400042CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Wiens JJ (2007) Species delimitation: new approaches for discovering diversity. Syst Biol 56:875–878CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  97. Wiens JJ, Servedio MR (2000) Species delimitation in systematics: inferring diagnostic differences between species. Proc R Soc B 267:631–636CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  98. Wiersema JH, León B (2016) The GRIN taxonomy crop wild relative inventory. Enhancing crop Genepool use: capturing wild relative and landrace diversity for crop improvement, CAB International, p 453Google Scholar
  99. Wood JR, Carine MA, Harris D, Wilkin P, Williams B, Scotland RW (2015) Ipomoea (Convolvulaceae) in Bolivia. Kew Bull 70:31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Yang Z, Rannala B (2010) Bayesian species delimitation using multilocus sequence data. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107:9264–9269CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  101. Zimin AV, Puiu D, Hall R, Kingan S, Salzberg SL (2017) The first near-complete assembly of the hexaploid bread wheat genome, Triticum aestivum. Giga Science 6:1–7Google Scholar

Copyright information

© This is a U.S. government work and not under copyright protection in the U.S.; foreign copyright protection may apply 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Richard E. Miller
    • 1
  • Colin K. Khoury
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.Flower Diversity Research InstituteHammondUSA
  2. 2.USDA, Agricultural Research Service, Center for Agricultural Resources Research, National Laboratory for Genetic Resources PreservationFort CollinsUSA
  3. 3.International Center for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT)CaliColombia

Personalised recommendations