Advertisement

Mechanical Behavior and Deformation Mechanisms of Mg-based Alloys in Shear Using In-Situ Synchrotron Radiation X-Ray Diffraction

  • Christopher S. MeredithEmail author
  • Zachary Herl
  • Marcus L. Young
Conference paper
Part of the Conference Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Mechanics Series book series (CPSEMS)

Abstract

A fundamental understanding of magnesium-based alloys during high rate, large deformation processes that occur during impact and penetration are not well-known. This metal possesses a limited number of deformation mechanisms, each with their own disparate strengths, strain hardening rates, and strain rate sensitivities. Consequently, these alloys exhibit severe tension-compression asymmetry and anisotropy dictated by their processing history and the applied deformation. Thus, an understanding of material behavior undergoing large shears at dynamic rates is required. Experiments have been performed on a specimen geometry that induces shear localization in “pure” simple shear, called the compact forced simple shear (CFSS) specimen. The deformation occurs on a 2D plane in the specimen, which is oriented with respect to directional aspects of the material’s microstructure and deformation modes. Experiments at dynamic strain rates have been performed to determine how the mechanical behavior in shear evolves and correlates to the microstructural deformation mechanisms. The experiments were performed at the Dynamic Compression Sector of the Advanced Photon Source at Argonne National Laboratories using in-situ synchrotron x-ray diffraction aimed to probe the microstructural evolution during shear-induced localization. By correlating the propensity for shear localization to occur with the mechanical response of various orientations, we have built a data set to compare existing models to identify key deformation mechanisms responsible for localization.

Keywords

Magnesium alloys In-situ x-ray diffraction Shear deformation Dynamic loading Texture evolution 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This publication is based upon work performed at the Dynamic Compression Sector, which is operated by Washington State University under the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)/National Nuclear Security Administration award no. DE-NA0002442. This research used resources of the Advanced Photon Source, a DOE Office of Science User Facility operated for the DOE Office of Science by Argonne National Laboratory under contract no. DE-AC02-06CH11357. The work was performed under a cooperative agreement between the Army Research Laboratory and the University of North Texas (W911NF-16-2-0189). Thanks to Nick Lorenzo (ARL) for helping to conduct the experiments at DCS.

References

  1. 1.
    Mordike, B.L., Ebert, T.: Magnesium properties–applications–potential. Mat. Sci. Eng. A. 302, 37–45 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Avedesian, M., Baker, H. (eds.): Magnesium and Magnesium Alloys, ASM Specialty Handbook. ASM International, Metals Park (1999)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Jain, A., Agnew, S.R.: Modeling the temperature dependent effect of twinning on the behavior of magnesium alloy AZ31B sheet. Mat. Sci. Eng. A. 462, 29–36 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Agnew, S.R., Duygulu, Ö.: Plastic anisotropy and the role of non-basal slip in magnesium alloy AZ31B. Int. J. Plast. 21, 1161–1193 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chang, Y., Kochmann, D.M.: A variational constitutive model for slip-twinning interactions in hcp metals: application to single- and polycrystalline magnesium. Int. J. Plast. 73, 39–61 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Agnew, S.R., Tomé, C.N., Brown, D.W., Holden, T.M., Vogel, S.C.: Study of slip mechanisms in a magnesium alloy by neutron diffraction and modeling. Scripta Mat. 48, 1003–1008 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Proust, G., Tomé, C.N., Jain, A., Agnew, S.R.: Modeling the effect of twinning and detwinning during strain-path changes of magnesium alloy AZ31. Int. J. Plast. 25, 861–880 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lentz, M., Risse, M., Schaefer, N., Reimers, W., Beyerlein, I.J.: Strength and ductility with \( \left\{10\overline{1}1\right\} \)\( \left\{10\overline{1}2\right\} \) double twinning in a magnesium alloy. Nat. Commun. 7, 11068 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bronkhorst, C.A., Cerreta, E.K., Xue, Q., Maudlin, P.J., Mason, T.A., Gray III, G.T.: An experimental and numerical study of the localization behavior of tantalum and stainless steel. Int. J. Plast. 22, 1304–1335 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Marchand, A., Duffy, J.: An experimental study of the formation process of adiabatic shear bands in a structural steel. J. Mech. Phys. Solids. 36, 251–283 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rittel, D., Lee, S., Ravichandran, G.: A Shear-compression specimen for large strain testing. Exp. Mech. 42, 58–64 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gray III, G.T., Vecchio, K.S., Livescu, V.: Compact forced simple-shear sample for studying shear localization in materials. Acta Mater. 103, 12–22 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Meredith, C.S., Lloyd, J.T., Sano, T.: The quasi-static and dynamic response of fine-grained Mg alloy AMX602: an experimental and computational study. Mat. Sci. Eng. A. 673, 73–82 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hustedt, C.J., Lambert, P.K., Huskins-Retzlaff, E.L., Casem, D.T., Tate, M.W., Philipp, H.T., Woll, A.R., Purohit, P., Weiss, J.T., Gruner, S.M., Ramesh, K.T., Hufnagel, T.C.: In situ time-resolved measurements of extension twinning during dynamic compression of polycrystalline magnesium. J. Dyn. Behav. Mat. 4, 222–230 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Brown, D.W., Agnew, S.R., Bourke, M.A.M., Holden, T.M., Vogel, S.C., Tomé, C.N.: Internal strain and texture evolution during deformation twinning in magnesium. Mat. Sci. Eng. A. 399, 1–12 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Society for Experimental Mechanics, Inc. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christopher S. Meredith
    • 1
    Email author
  • Zachary Herl
    • 2
  • Marcus L. Young
    • 2
  1. 1.Impact Physics Branch, Army Research Lab, Aberdeen Proving GroundAberdeenUSA
  2. 2.Department of Materials Science & EngineeringUniversity of North TexasDentonUSA

Personalised recommendations