Experimental Study on Dynamic Fracture Response of Al6063-T6 Under High Rates of Loading

  • Anoop Kumar Pandouria
  • Purnashis Chakraborty
  • Sanjay Kumar
  • Vikrant Tiwari
Conference paper
Part of the Conference Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Mechanics Series book series (CPSEMS)


The focus of the current article is to investigate the dynamic fracture toughness of aluminum alloy Al6063-T6 under three-point transient loading conditions. Prior to the dynamic evaluation, three-point bend experiment were also conducted under the quasi-static conditions to evaluate the static fracture toughness using standard formulations available in the literature. Modified Hopkinson pressure bar and ultra-high speed 3D-Digital image correlation (DIC) procedure was utilized to identify the crack initiation time and the crack mouth opening displacement (CMOD) of the specimen under transient loading conditions. To develop the better understanding of the failure mechanism of the specimen, fracture toughness at different strain rates were evaluated. A good agreement between the both Strain gauge measurements and DIC results was observed.


CMOD DIC Dynamic fracture toughness MHPB High strain rate 


  1. 1.
    Bacon, C., Farm, J., Lataillade, J.L.: Dynamic fracture toughness determine from load point displacement. Exp. Mech. 34, 217–223 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Rubio, L., Fernandez-Saez, J., Navarro, C.: Determination of dynamic fracture-initiation toughness using three-point bending tests in a modified Hopkinson pressure bar. Exp. Mech. 43, 379–386 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Singh, R.P., Parameswaran, V.: An experimental investigation of dynamic crack propagation in a brittle material reinforced with a ductile material. Opt. Lasers Eng. 40, 289–306 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Galvez, F., Cendon, D., Garcia, N., Enfedaque, A., Sanchez Galvez, V.: Dynamic fracture toughness of a high strength armor steel. Eng. Fail. Anal. 16, 2567–2575 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ibrahim, U., Irfan, M.A.: Dynamic crack propagation and arrested in rapid prototype material. Rapid Prototyp. J. 18, 154–160 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    ASTM Standard E 399–90: Standard Test Method for Plain Strain Fracture Toughness of Metallic Materials. Annual Book of ASTM Standards, ASTM International, West Conshohocken (1994)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sutton, M.A., Orteu, J.J., Schreier, H.: Image Correlation for Shape, Motion and Deformation Measurements: Basic Concepts, Theory and Applications. Springer Science & Business Media, Boston (2009)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Nishioka, T., Atluri, S.: A method for determining dynamic stress intensity factors from COD measurement at the notch mouth in dynamic tear testing. Eng. Fracture Mech. 16(3), 333–339 (1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Guinea, G., Pastor, J., Planas, J., Elices, M.: Stress intensity factor compliance and CMOD for a general three-point bend beam. Int. J. Fracture. 89(3), 103–116 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Society for Experimental Mechanics, Inc. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anoop Kumar Pandouria
    • 1
  • Purnashis Chakraborty
    • 1
  • Sanjay Kumar
    • 1
  • Vikrant Tiwari
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Applied MechanicsIndian Institute of Technology DelhiNew DelhiIndia

Personalised recommendations