Experimental Investigation of Rate Sensitive Mechanical Response of Pure Polyurea

  • K. Srinivas
  • C. Lakshmana Rao
  • Venkitanarayanan Parameswaran
Conference paper
Part of the Conference Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Mechanics Series book series (CPSEMS)


The application of layered composite structural systems to protect the main structure during vehicle collisions, blast loading and other high impact applications has been a major focus of interest in the automobile industry over the last few decades. Enhancing the energy absorption, improving blast resistance and improving the dynamic fracture resistance of metallic plate structures has been the main challenges in these studies. Polyurea is a good candidate which has excellent mechanical as well as chemical properties. In the present work, a detailed study has been made on the rate sensitive response of pure form of polyurea. The experiments were carried out by Split Hopkinson Pressure Bar(SHPB) over a wide range of strain rates(1000–4500 s−1) to measure the stress-strain response of the material. A brief analysis has been made on the stiffness calculation & to see how stress is varying with respect to strain rate at different strains.


Pure Polyurea High-strain rate loading Rate sensitivity SHPB Pulse shaper Impact resistance Etc 



All the experimental work was done at High-Speed Experimental Mechanics(HSEM) Laboratory, IIT Kanpur. The authors thank Mr.Manoj Kumar for experimental assistance and Mr.Ramesh Chandra of Fosroc Constructive Solutions for supplying pure form of Polyurea required for this work.


  1. 1.
    Ackland, K., Anderson, C., Ngo, T.D.: Deformation of polyurea-coated steel plates under localised blast loading. Int. J. Impact Eng. 51, 13–22 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Xue, L., Willis Jr., M., Belytschko, T.: Penetration of DH-36 steel plates with and without polyurea coating. Mech. Mater. 42(11), 981–1003 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Rijensky, O., Rittel, D.: Polyurea coated aluminum plates under hydrodynamic loading: does side matter? Int. J. Impact Eng. 98, 1–12 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Youssef, G.H.: Dynamic Properties of Polyurea. University of California, Los Angeles (2011)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Shim, J.: Finite Strain Behavior of Polyurea for a Wide Range of Strain Rates. Massachusetts Inst of Tech Cambridge Dept of Civil And Environmental Engineering, (2010)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Rao, C., Lakshmana, V., Narayanamurthy, K., Simha, R.Y.: Applied Impact Mechanics. Wiley, Chichester (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jiang, T.Z., Xue, P., Butt, H.S.U.: Pulse shaper design for dynamic testing of viscoelastic materials using polymeric SHPB. Int. J. Impact Eng. 79, 45–52 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Song, B., Chen, W.: Loading and unloading split Hopkinson pressure bar pulse-shaping techniques for dynamic hysteretic loops. Exp. Mech. 44(6), 622–627 (2004)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Amini, M.R., Isaacs, J.B., Nemat-Nasser, S.: Experimental investigation of response of monolithic and bilayer plates to impulsive loads. Int. J. Impact Eng. 37(1), 82–89 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mohotti, D., et al.: Plastic deformation of polyurea coated composite aluminium plates subjected to low velocity impact. Mater. Des. 56(2014), 696–713 (1980-2015)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gardner, N., et al.: Blast mitigation in a sandwich composite using graded core and polyurea interlayer. Exp. Mech. 52(2), 119–133 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Song, B., et al.: A long split Hopkinson pressure bar (LSHPB) for intermediate-rate characterization of soft materials. Exp. Mech. 48(6), 809–815 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Meyers, M.A.: Dynamic Behavior of Materials. Wiley, New York (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Albrecht, A.B., Liechti, K.M., Ravi-Chandar, K.: Characterization of the transient response of polyurea. Exp. Mech. 53(1), 113–122 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Johnson, T.P.M., Sarva, S.S., Socrate, S.: Comparison of low impedance split-Hopkinson pressure bar techniques in the characterization of polyurea. Exp. Mech. 50.7, 931–940 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sarva, S.S., et al.: Stress–strain behavior of a polyurea and a polyurethane from low to high strain rates. Polymer. 48(8), 2208–2213 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Shim, J., Mohr, D.: Using split Hopkinson pressure bars to perform large strain compression tests on polyurea at low, intermediate and high strain rates. Int. J. Impact Eng. 36(9), 1116–1127 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Chen, W.W., Song, B.: Split Hopkinson (Kolsky) Bar: Design, Testing and Applications. Springer Science & Business Media, Boston (2010)zbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Society for Experimental Mechanics, Inc. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • K. Srinivas
    • 1
  • C. Lakshmana Rao
    • 1
  • Venkitanarayanan Parameswaran
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Applied MechanicsIndian Institute of Technology MadrasChennaiIndia
  2. 2.Department of Mechanical EngineeringIndian Institute of Technology KanpurKanpurIndia

Personalised recommendations