Advertisement

Proton Radiography of Reverse Ballistic Impacts

  • Brady AydelotteEmail author
  • Michael Golt
  • Brian Schuster
  • Jason Allison
  • Frank Cherne
  • Matthew Freeman
  • Johnny Goett III
  • Brian Hollander
  • Brian Jensen
  • Julian Lopez
  • Fesseha Mariam
  • Michael Martinez
  • Jason Medina
  • Christopher Morris
  • Levi Neukirch
  • Adam Pacheco
  • Mary Sandstrom
  • Alexander Andy Saunders
  • Tamsen Schurmann
  • Amy Tainter
  • Zhaowen Tang
  • Dale Tupa
  • Joshua Tybo
  • Wendy Vogan-McNeil
  • Carl Wilde
  • John Wright
Conference paper
Part of the Conference Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Mechanics Series book series (CPSEMS)

Abstract

Ceramics are important materials due to their high strength and hardness, particularly in armor systems such as personnel body armor where they are used extensively. Understanding the failure process for these types of systems is key to improving their performance. To better understand the process of failure in ceramic materials subjected to ballistic impacts, we planned and executed reverse ballistic experiments to study material failure during impact on a silicon carbide target. The primary diagnostic tool we used was proton radiography conducted at Los Alamos National Laboratory Neutron Science Center (LANSCE) using their 800 mega-electron-volt (MeV) linear accelerator. Proton radiography at this facility is capable of excellent spatial and temporal resolution with up to 31 frames of data captured with variable frame spacing and gate time. We report and discuss some of the results of these experiments.

Keywords

Fracture Impact Proton radiography Ceramic Damage 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We gratefully acknowledge the assistance of support staff and technicians at ARL who assisted with preliminary experiments in preparation for the proton radiography experiments at LANL and the support staff and technicians at LANL who helped prepare and execute these experiments. We would like to thank Brian Leavy (ARL) for providing the WHA long rod penetrators. We would also like to thank Lee Magness (ARL), Tyler Ehlers (ARL), Jerry LaSalvia (ARL), and Jim Campbell (ARL) for helpful advice and discussion. Finally, we’d like to acknowledge John Niederhaus of the ALEGRA development team (SNL) for his assistance in debugging simulations which were run in support of these experiments.

References

  1. 1.
    Rosenberg, Z., Dekel, E.: Terminal Ballistics. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Orphal, D.L., Franzen, R.R.: Penetration of confined silicon carbide targets by tungsten long rods at impact velocities from 1.5 to 4.6 km/s. Int. J. Impact Eng. 19, 1–13 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hauver, G.E., Rapacki, E.J., Netherwood, P.H., Benck R.F.: Interface Defeat of Long-Rod Projectiles by Ceramic Armor. No. ARL-TR-3590 (2005)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lundberg, P., Lundberg, B.: Transition between interface defeat and penetration for tungsten projectiles and four silicon carbide materials. Int. J. Impact Eng. 31, 781–792 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Aydelotte, B., Schuster, B.: Impact and penetration of SiC: the role of rod strength in the transition from dwell to penetration. Procedia Eng. 103, 19–26 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Brown, E.N., Olson, R.T., Gray, G.T., Buttler, W.T., Oro, D.M., Zellner, M.B., Dandekar, D.P., King, N.S.P., Kwiatkowski, K.K., Mariam, F.G., et al.: Quantitative visualization of high-rate material response with dynamic proton radiography, p. 405–411. In: Conference Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Mechanics Series. Springer, Cham (2014)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Goett III, J.: Recent developments in high-speed proton radiography at LANSCE. SPIE Optics+Photonics (2017)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    King, N.S.P., Ables, E., Adams, K., Alrick, K.R., Amann, J.F., Balzar, S., Barnes Jr, P.D., Crow, M.L., Cushing, S.B., Eddleman, J.C., et al.: An 800-mev proton radiography facility for dynamic experiments. Nucl. Inst. Methods Phys. Res. A 424, 84–91 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ziock, H.J., Adams, K.J., Alrick, K.R., Amann, J.F., Boissevain, J.G., Crow, M.L., Cushing, S.B., Eddleman, J.C., Espinoza, C.J., Fife, T.T.: The proton radiography concept. Los Alamos National Report LA-UR-98-1368 (1998)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Society for Experimental Mechanics, Inc. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Brady Aydelotte
    • 1
    Email author
  • Michael Golt
    • 1
  • Brian Schuster
    • 1
  • Jason Allison
    • 2
  • Frank Cherne
    • 2
  • Matthew Freeman
    • 2
  • Johnny Goett III
    • 2
  • Brian Hollander
    • 2
  • Brian Jensen
    • 2
  • Julian Lopez
    • 2
  • Fesseha Mariam
    • 2
  • Michael Martinez
    • 2
  • Jason Medina
    • 2
  • Christopher Morris
    • 2
  • Levi Neukirch
    • 2
  • Adam Pacheco
    • 2
  • Mary Sandstrom
    • 2
  • Alexander Andy Saunders
    • 2
  • Tamsen Schurmann
    • 2
  • Amy Tainter
    • 2
  • Zhaowen Tang
    • 2
  • Dale Tupa
    • 2
  • Joshua Tybo
    • 2
  • Wendy Vogan-McNeil
    • 2
  • Carl Wilde
    • 2
  • John Wright
    • 2
  1. 1.US Army Research LaboratoryAberdeen Proving GroundUSA
  2. 2.Los Alamos National LaboratoryLos AlamosUSA

Personalised recommendations