Abstract
Small-scale fisheries require knowledge in decision-making, particularly as they face many of the same issues affecting large-scale, industrial fisheries, such as declining fish stocks, marine habitats degradation, resource use competition, and climate change. There are other characteristics of small-scale fisheries, however, that cause additional challenges. For example, small-scale fisheries target many species that are not usually exploited by their large-scale counterpart. The export values from small-scale fisheries catches are also generally lower than those from large-scale, due partly to the subsistence nature of small-scale fisheries and the relatively high proportion of use directly for household consumption in local communities. Systematic data collection and information systems drawing data from multiple sources, through on-board sampling and market sampling, have been focused mostly on large-scale fisheries and the economic contribution of small-scale fisheries may not justify investment in the ‘machinery’ of modern fishery science. In this chapter, we briefly review approaches and models used in assessing large-scale fisheries as part of the modern fisheries management and discuss their applicability to small-scale fisheries. Next, we present four examples of initiatives that aim to improve information about small-scale fisheries through: (i) national-level fisheries statistics; (ii) information crowdsourcing; (iii) effort estimation; and, (iv) integration of fishers’ knowledge in marine spatial planning. The chapter concludes with recommendations about ways forward.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Too Big To Ignore (http://toobigtoignore.net/)
- 2.
References
Ackoff R (1989) From data to wisdom. J Applies Syst Anal 16:3–9
Akrich M, Callon M, Latour B (eds) (2006) Sociologie de la traduction. Textes fondateurs. In: Sociologie de la traduction. Presses des Mines, Paris
Alfaro-Shigueto J, Mangel JC, Pajuelo M et al (2010) Where small can have a large impact: structure and characterization of small-scale fisheries in Peru. Fish Res 106:8–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.FISHRES.2010.06.004
Bartholomew DC, Mangel JC, Alfaro-Shigueto J et al (2018) Remote electronic monitoring as a potential alternative to on-board observers in small-scale fisheries. Biol Conserv 219:35–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BIOCON.2018.01.003
Béné C, Friend RM (2009) Water, poverty and inland fisheries: lessons from Africa and Asia. Water Int 34:47–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/02508060802677838
Bennett NJ, Govan H, Satterfield T (2015) Ocean grabbing. Mar Policy 57:61–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MARPOL.2015.03.026
Beverton RJH, Holt SJ (1957) On the dynamics of exploited fish populations. Fisheries investigations series 2 marine fisheries no.19. Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food. In Status of marine fish stocks. European Environment Agency, Copenhagen, fisheries
Boucquey N, Fairbanks L, St. Martin K et al (2016) The ontological politics of marine spatial planning: assembling the ocean and shaping the capacities of “community” and “environment”. Geoforum 75:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.GEOFORUM.2016.06.014
Brandt P, Ernst A, Gralla F et al (2013) A review of transdisciplinary research in sustainability science. Ecol Econ 92:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ECOLECON.2013.04.008
Bravo de Laguna J (1989) Managing an international multispecies fishery: the Saharan trawl fishery for cephalopods. In: Caddy JF (ed) Marine invertebrate fisheries: their assessment and management. Wiley, New York, pp 591–612
Caddy J (1983) The cephalopod: factors relevant to their population dynamics and to the assessment and management of stock. In: Advances in assessment of world cephalopod resources. Fisheries technical paper no. 231. FAO, Rome, Italy, pp 416–452
Callon M (2006) What does it mean to say that economics is performative? CSI working papers series 005
Choi B, Pak A (2006) Multidisciplinary, interdisciplinary and transdisciplinarity in health research, services, education and policy: 1. Definitions, objectives, and evidence of effectiveness. Clin Invest Med 29:351–364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac.2010.08.010
Chuenpagdee R, Pauly D (2004) Small is beautiful? A database approach for global assessment of small-scale fisheries. In: Proceedings of the 4th World Fisheries Congress, May 2–6, 2004. Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Chuenpagdee R, Rocklin D, Bishop D et al (2017) The global information system on small-scale fisheries (ISSF): a crowdsourced knowledge platform. Mar Policy. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MARPOL.2017.06.018
Cigliano JA, Meyer R, Ballard HL et al (2015) Making marine and coastal citizen science matter. Ocean Coast Manag 115:77–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.OCECOAMAN.2015.06.012
de la Torre-Castro M, Di Carlo G, Jiddawi NS (2014) Seagrass importance for a small-scale fishery in the tropics: the need for seascape management. Mar Pollut Bull 83:398–407. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MARPOLBUL.2014.03.034
Degnbol D, Wilson DC (2008) Spatial planning on the North Sea: a case of cross-scale linkages. Mar Policy 32:189–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MARPOL.2007.09.006
Douvere F (2008) The importance of marine spatial planning in advancing ecosystem-based sea use management. Mar Policy 32:762–771. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MARPOL.2008.03.021
EEA (European Environment Agency) (2015) Status of marine fish stocks. EEA, Copenhagen
Fairclough DV, Brown JI, Carlish BJ et al (2015) Breathing life into fisheries stock assessments with citizen science. Sci Rep 4:7249. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep07249
FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations) (2015a) Voluntary guidelines for securing sustainable small-scale fisheries. FAO, Rome
FAO (2015b) Fisheries and Aquaculture topics. Fisheries statistics and information. In: Fisheries and Aquaculture Department [online]. Rome, Italy
FAO (2017) Improving our knowledge on small-scale fisheries: data needs and methodologies – Workshop proceedings. FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Proceedings 56. FAO, Rome
FAO-EASTMED (2018) Scientific and institutional cooperation to support responsible fisheries in the Eastern Mediterranean. http://www.faoeastmed.org/. Accessed 3 Mar 2018
FAO-UN (2018) Ecosystem Approach to Fisheries (EAF). http://www.fao.org/fishery/topic/16034/en. Accessed 28 Feb 2018
Finley C (2011) Fish unlimited: how maximum sustained yield failed fishermen. Solut J 2:77–81
Finley C, Oreskes N (2013) Maximum sustained yield: a policy disguised as science. ICES J Mar Sci 70:245–250. https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fss192
Flyvberg B (1998) Rationality and power: democracy in practice. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Gee J, Bacher K (2017) Gender in aquaculture and fisheries: engendering security in fisheries and aquaculture. Asian Fish Sci Spec Issue 30S:277–290
Gomez-Muñoz VM (1990) A model to estimate catches from a short fishery statistics survey. Bull Mar Sci 46:719–722
Gras M, Roel BA, Coppin F et al (2014) A two-stage biomass model to assess the English Channel cuttlefish (Sepia officinalis L.) stock. ICES J Mar Sci 71:2457–2468. https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsu081
Guillemot N, Léopold M, Cuif M et al (2009) Characterization and management of informal fisheries confronted with socio-economic changes in New Caledonia (South Pacific). Fish Res 98:51–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.FISHRES.2009.03.013
Guyader O, Berthou P, Koutsikopoulos C et al (2013) Small scale fisheries in Europe: a comparative analysis based on a selection of case studies. Fish Res 140:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.FISHRES.2012.11.008
Haggan N, Neis B, Baird I (eds) (2007) Fishers’ knowledge in fisheries science and management. UNESCO Publishing, Paris
Hilborn R, Walters CJ (1992) Quantitative fisheries stock assessment: choice, dynamics and uncertainty. Chapman and Hall, New York
Hind EJ (2015) A review of the past, the present, and the future of fishers’ knowledge research: a challenge to established fisheries science. ICES J Mar Sci 72:341–358. https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsu169
Hinz H, Murray LG, Lambert GI et al (2013) Confidentiality over fishing effort data threatens science and management progress. Fish Fish 14:110–117. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-2979.2012.00475.x
HM Government (2014) East inshore and east offshore marine plans. London, UK
Holt S (2011) Maximum sustainable yield: the worst idea in fisheries management. In: Breaching blue. https://breachingtheblue.com/2011/10/03/maximum-sustainable-yield-the-worst-idea-in-fisheries-management/
Hughes T (2011) The future of marine governance. Solut J 2:18–20
ICES (International Council for the Exploration of the Sea) (2010) Report of the Working Group on Cephalopod Fisheries and Life History (WGCEPH), 9–11 March 2010, Sukarrieta, Spain. ICES CM 2010/SSGEF:09. ICES, Copenhagen
ICES (2014) Report of the Working Group on Cephalopod Fisheries and Life History (WGCEPH), 16–19 June 2014, Lisbon, Portugal.ICES CM 2014/SSGEF:02. Copenhagen
ICSF (2016) New, but long overdue. Samudara Report No. 72
IOC-UNESCO, EC-DGMARE (2017) 2nd international conference on marine/maritime spatial planning, 15–17 March 2017, Paris, France; IOC. Workshop report
Jentoft S, Chuenpagdee R (eds) (2015) Interactive governance for small-scale fisheries: global reflections. Springer, Cham
Jentoft S, Knol M (2014) Marine spatial planning: risk or opportunity for fisheries in the North Sea? Marit Stud 2014 13:1–16. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/2212-9790-13-1
Johnson AF, Moreno-Báez M, Giron-Nava A et al (2017) A spatial method to calculate small-scale fisheries effort in data poor scenarios. PLoS One 12:4. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0174064
Kannen A (2014) Challenges for marine spatial planning in the context of multiple sea uses, policy arenas and actors based on experiences from the German North Sea. Reg Environ Chang 14:2139–2150. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-012-0349-7
Kelleher K (2005) Discards in the world’s marine fisheries an update. United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization fisheries technical paper 470. FAO, Rome
Mauser W, Klepper G, Rice M et al (2013) Transdisciplinary global change research: the co-creation of knowledge for sustainability. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 5:420–431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2013.07.001
Mingers J (2015) Helping business schools engage with real problems: the contribution of critical realism and systems thinking. Eur J Oper Res 242:316–331. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.EJOR.2014.10.058
Mintzberg H (1994) The rise and fall of strategic planning. Harv Bus Rev:107–114
Otero J, Álvarez–Salgado XA, González AF et al (2008) Bottom-up control of Octopus vulgaris abundance in a wind-driven upwelling ecosystem (NE Atlantic). Mar Ecol Prog Ser 362:181–192
Pauly D (2006) Major trends in small-scale fisheries, with emphasis on developing countries and some implications for the social sciences. Mari Stud 4:7–22
Pauly D (2018) A vision for marine fisheries in a global blue economy. Mar Policy 87:371–374. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MARPOL.2017.11.010
Pauly D, Zeller D (2016) Catch reconstructions reveal that global marine fisheries catches are higher than reported and declining. Nat Commun 7:10244. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms10244
Pierce GJ, Guerra A (1994) Stock assessment methods used for cephalopod fisheries. Fish Res 21:255–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-7836(94)90108-2
Pierce GJ, Valavanis VD, Guerra A et al (2008) A review of cephalopod – environment interactions in European Seas. Hydrobiologia 612:49–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9141-4_5
Pierce GJ, Allcock L, Bruno I et al (2010) Cephalopod biology and fisheries in Europe. Cooperative research report 303. International council for the exploration of the Sea
Pinello D, Gee J, Dimech M (2017) Handbook for fisheries socio-economic sample survey – principles and practice. FAO fisheries and aquaculture technical paper no. 613. FAO, Rome
Pita CB, Pereira J, Lourenço S et al (2015) The traditional small-scale octopus fishery in Portugal: framing its governability. In: Jentoft S, Chuenpagdee R (eds) Interactive governance for small-scale fisheries: global reflections. Springer, Cham, pp 117–134
Qiu W, Jones PJS (2013) The emerging policy landscape for marine spatial planning in Europe. Mar Policy 39:182–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MARPOL.2012.10.010
Ramírez JG, Lleonart J, Coll M et al (2017) Improving stock assessment and management advice for data-poor small-scale fisheries through participatory monitoring. Fish Res 190:71–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.FISHRES.2017.01.015
Rocha F, Otero J, Outeiral R et al (2006) Modelling small-scale coastal fisheries of Galicia (NW Spain) based on data obtained from fisheries: the case of Sepia officinalis. Sci Mar 70:593–601. https://doi.org/10.3989/scimar.2006.70n4593
Rocklin D (2016a) Small-scale fisheries of the world. In: Chuenpagdee R, Rocklin D (eds) State-of-the-Art in small-scale fisheries. TBTI Publication Series, St. John’s, p 8
Rocklin D (2016b) Who’s who in small-scale fisheries. In: Chuenpagdee R, Rocklin D (eds) Small-scale fisheries of the world. TBTI Publication Series, St. John’s, p 8
Rodhouse PGK, Pierce GJ, Nichols OC et al (2014) Environmental effects on cephalopod population dynamics. Adv Mar Biol 67:99–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-800287-2.00002-0
Royer J, Pierce GJ, Foucher E, Robin JP (2006) The English Channel stock of Sepia officinalis: modelling variability in abundance and impact of the fishery. Fish Res 78:96–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.FISHRES.2005.12.004
Silva L, Sobrino I, Ramos F (2002) Reproductive biology of the common octopus, Octopus vulgaris Cuvier, 1797 (Cephalopoda: Octopodidae) in the Gulf of Cádiz (SW Spain). Bull Mar Sci 71:837–850
Sobrino I, Silva L, Bellido J, Ramos F (2002) Rainfall, river discharges and sea temperature as factors affecting abundance of two coastal benthic cephalopod species in the Gulf of Cádiz (SW Spain). Bull Mar Sci 71:851–865
Stewart KR, Lewison RL, Dunn DC et al (2010) Characterizing fishing effort and spatial extent of coastal fisheries. PLoS One 5:e14451. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0014451
Stop Illegal Fishing (2016) How drones are being used in the fight against poachers. https://stopillegalfishing.com/press-links/drones-used-fight-poachers/. Accessed 14 Apr 2018
Swyngedouw E (2009) The antinomies of the postpolitical city: in search of a democratic politics of environmental production. Int J Urban Reg Res 33:601–620. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2009.00859.x
Tafon RV (2018) Taking power to sea: towards a post-structuralist discourse theoretical critique of marine spatial planning. Environ Plan C Polit Space 36:258–273. https://doi.org/10.1177/2399654417707527
Thompson D, FAO (1988) The world’s two marine fishing industries – how they compare. Naga, the ICLARM Quarterly 11:17
United Nations (2015) Rethinking poverty: report on the world social situation 2010 social perspective on development. https://www.un.org/development/desa/socialperspectiveondevelopment/2015/08/20/rethinking-poverty-report-on-the-world-social-situation-2010/. Accessed 17 Jan 2018
Waluda CM, Trathan PN, Elvidge CD et al (2002) Throwing light on straddling stocks of Illex argentinus: assessing fishing intensity with satellite imagery. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 59:592–596. https://doi.org/10.1139/f02-049
Whatmore SJ (2009) Mapping knowledge controversies: science, democracy and the redistribution of expertise. Prog Hum Geogr 33:587–598. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132509339841
Wolff M (2015) From sea sharing to sea sparing – is there a paradigm shift in ocean management? Ocean Coast Manag 116:58–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.OCECOAMAN.2015.07.004
World Bank, FAO, WorldFish Center (2012) Hidden harvest: the global contribution of capture fisheries. Report No. 66469-GLB. Washington, DC
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Agapito, M. et al. (2019). Beyond the Basics: Improving Information About Small-Scale Fisheries. In: Chuenpagdee, R., Jentoft, S. (eds) Transdisciplinarity for Small-Scale Fisheries Governance. MARE Publication Series, vol 21. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94938-3_20
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94938-3_20
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-94937-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-94938-3
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)