Advertisement

Using Transdisciplinary Research Solutions to Support Governance in Inland Fisheries

  • Shannon D. BowerEmail author
  • Andrew M. Song
  • Paul Onyango
  • Steven J. Cooke
  • Jeppe Kolding
Chapter
Part of the MARE Publication Series book series (MARE, volume 21)

Abstract

The diverse nature of internal and external threats and fishery attributes in inland fisheries indicates that the development of long-term solutions to governance issues will require interaction among multiple disciplines and actors. Pollution, habitat alteration, invasive species, and hydropower development are widespread problems that are often external to threats imposed by inland fisheries, but greatly impact fishery productivity. Within inland fisheries, challenges of overfishing, equitable access, conflict, and an overall lack of political will to sustain inland fisheries at the regional, national, and international policy levels serve to pressure the sector further. Power dynamics, governance systems, and regulations play a role in determining the perspectives from which solutions to these issues are viewed, and thereby the perspectives from which they are defined as a success. Promoting transdisciplinary research in inland fisheries can support development of successful governance solutions by providing relevant insights to identify and inform these perspectives. Here, we offer examples of redefined governance problems and potential strategies for addressing them using transdisciplinary research approaches. We conclude by offering suggestions for improving transdisciplinary research in inland fisheries.

Keywords

Freshwater fisheries Inland fisheries Sustainability Transdisciplinary research 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the TBTI Inland Fisheries Cluster members for their participation in the Inland Fisheries Governance Ebook, which contributed greatly to this chapter. We would also like to extend our sincere thanks to our reviewers, whose careful attention to this manuscript was immensely helpful. We hope this chapter is of value to anyone wishing to explore transdisciplinarity in inland fisheries research.

References

  1. Andrew NL, Béné C, Ratner BD et al (2007) Diagnosis and management of small-scale fisheries in developing countries. Fish Fish 8(3):227–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beard TD, Arlinghaus R, Cowx IG et al (2011) Ecosystem approach to inland fisheries: research needs and implementation strategies. Biol Lett 23:481–483CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Béné C (2006) Small-scale fisheries: assessing their contribution to rural livelihoods in developing countries. FAO, RomeGoogle Scholar
  4. Béné C, Hersoug B, Allison EH (2010) Not by rent alone: analyzing the pro-poor functions of small-scale fisheries in developing countries. Dev Policy Rev 28(3):325–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blythe J, Nash K, Cumming G et al (2017) Feedbacks as a bridging concept for advancing transdisciplinary sustainability research. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 26:114–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brandt P, Ernst A, von Wehrden H et al (2013) A review of transdisciplinary research in sustainability science. Ecol Econ 92:1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bulkeley H, Mol AP (2003) Participation and environmental governance: consensus, ambivalence and debate. Environ Value 12(2):143–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chuenpagdee R, Song AM (2012) Institutional thinking in fisheries governance: broadening perspectives. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 4(3):309–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Crona B, Bodin Ö (2010) Power asymmetries in small-scale fisheries: a barrier to governance transformability. Ecol Soc 15(4):32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. DeLorme DE, Kidwell D, Hagen SC et al (2016) Developing and managing transdisciplinary and transformative research on the coastal dynamics of sea level rise: experiences and lessons learned. Earth’s Future 4:194–209.  https://doi.org/10.1002/2015EF000346 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. FAO (United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization) (2015) Voluntary guidelines for securing sustainable small-scale fisheries in the context of food security and poverty eradication. FAO, RomeGoogle Scholar
  12. Gaden M, Goddard CI, Read J (2013) A history of multi-jurisdictional management of the shared Great Lakes fishery: transcending conflict and diffuse political authority. In: Taylor W, Lynch A, Leonard N (eds) Great Lakes fishery management and policy. Michigan University Press, East Lansing, pp 305–337Google Scholar
  13. Game ET, Meijaard E, Sheil D et al (2014) Conservation in a wicked complex world; challenges and solutions. Conserv Lett 7(3):271–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gutiérrez NL, Hilborn R, Defeo O (2011) Leadership, social capital and incentives promote successful fisheries. Nature 470(7334):386–389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hall KL, Vogel AL, Stipelman BA et al (2012) A four-phase model of transdisciplinary team-based research: goals, team processes, and strategies. Transl Behav Med 2(4):415–430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hudson JC, Ziegler SS (2014) Environment, culture, and the Great Lakes fisheries. Geogr Rev 104(4):391–413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jackson SA (2015) A fresh perspective for marine fisheries: ecosystem based fisheries management in the Laurentian Great Lakes. Dissertation, University of WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  18. Jahn T, Bergmann M, Keil F (2012) Transdisciplinarity: between mainstreaming and marginalization. Ecol Econ 79:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jentoft S, Chuenpagdee R (2009) Fisheries and coastal governance as a wicked problem. Mar Policy 33(4):553–560CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jentoft S, Chuenpagdee R (2015) Interactive governance for small-scale fisheries: global reflections. Springer International Publishing, DordrechtCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jul-Larsen E, Graça FB, Nielsen JR et al (1998) Research and Fisheries Management; the Uneasy Relationship. Review of the Zambia-Zimbabwe SADC Fisheries Project. Chr. Michelsen Institute, R1998:1, Bergen Norway. https://brage.bibsys.no/xmlui/handle/11250/2435726. Accessed 15 Apr 2018
  22. Kahane A (2017) Collaborating with the enemy: how to work with people you don’t agree with or like or trust. Berrett-Koehler Publishers, OaklandGoogle Scholar
  23. Kapoor I (2001) Towards participatory environmental management? J Environ Manage 63(3):269–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Khan AS, Neis B (2010) The rebuilding imperative in fisheries: clumsy solutions for a wicked problem. Prog Oceanogr 87(1):347–356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kolding J, van Zwieten PA (2011) The tragedy of our legacy: how do global management discourses affect small scale fisheries in the south? In Forum for development studies 38(3). Routledge, pp 267–297Google Scholar
  26. Kolding J, Musando B, Songore N (2003) Inshore fisheries and fish population changes in Lake Kariba. In: Jul-Larsen E, Kolding J, Nielsen JR et al (eds) Management, co-management or no management? Major dilemmas in southern African freshwater fisheries. Part 2: case studies, FAO fisheries technical paper 426/2. FAO, RomeGoogle Scholar
  27. Kolding J, Béné C, Bavinck M (2014) Small-scale fisheries – importance, vulnerability, and deficient knowledge. In: Garcia S, Rice J, Charles A (eds) Governance for marine fisheries and biodiversity conservation interaction and coevolution. Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford, pp 317–331Google Scholar
  28. Kolding J, Jacobsen NS, Andersen KH et al (2015) Maximizing fisheries yields while maintaining community structure. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 73(4):644–655CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kolding J, van Zwieten PAM, Mosepele K (2016) Where there is water there is fish – small-scale inland fisheries in Africa: dynamics and importance. In: Tvedt T, Oestigaard T (eds) A history of water 3(3) Water and food: from hunter-gatherers to global production in Africa. I.B. Tauris, LondonGoogle Scholar
  30. Kooiman J, Bavinck M, Jentoft S et al (2005) Fish for life. Amsterdam University Press, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  31. Lynch AJ, Cooke SJ, Beard TD Jr et al (2016) The social, economic, and environmental importance of inland fish and fisheries. Environ Rev 24:115–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lynch AJ, Cowx IG, Youn S et al (2017) Inland fisheries – invisible but integral to the UN Sustainable Development Agenda for ending poverty by 2030. Global Environ Chang 47:167–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. McCrimmon DA Jr (2002) Sustainable fisheries management in the Great Lakes: scientific and operational challenges. Lake Reserv Manage 7(3):241–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mhlanga W, Nyikahadzoi K (2017) Competing claims in a multipurpose lake: mapping resource conflicts on Lake Kariba. In: Song AM, Bower SD, Chuenpagdee R et al (eds) Inter-sectoral governance of inland fisheries, TBTI publication series, E-01/2017, Too Big to Ignore. WorldFish, St John’s, pp 71–83Google Scholar
  35. Minns CK (2013) The science of ecosystem-based management on a global scale: the Laurentian Great Lakes, Lake Ontario, and the Bay of Quinte as a nested case study. Aquat Ecosyst Health 16(3):229–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Nayak PK, Armitage D, Andrachuk M (2016) Power and politics of social–ecological regime shifts in the Chilika lagoon, India and Tam Giang lagoon, Vietnam. Reg Environ Chang 16:325–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Nguyen VM, Lynch AJ, Cooke SJ et al (2016) To manage inland fisheries is to manage at the social-ecological watershed scale. J Environ Manage 181:312–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Norman ES (2015) Governing transboundary waters: Canada, the United States, and indigenous communities. Routledge, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  39. Paterson B, Isaacs M, Hara M et al (2010) Transdisciplinary co-operation for an ecosystem approach to fisheries: a case study from the South African sardine fishery. Mar Policy 34(4):782–794CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Patterson DA, Robinson KA, Cooke SJ et al (2017) Guidance to derive and update fishing-related incidental mortality rates for Pacific Salmon. DFO Canadian Science Advisory Secretariat. Doc. 2017/011. vii + 56 pGoogle Scholar
  41. Pomeroy RS, Katon BM, Harkes I (2001) Conditions affecting the success of fisheries co-management: lessons from Asia. Mar Policy 25(3):197–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Rittel HWJ, Webber MM (1973) Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sci 4:155–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Roux DJ, Nel JL, Fabricius C et al (2017) Transdisciplinary research for systemic change: who to learn with, what to learn about and how to learn. Sustain Sci 12:1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Sathyapalan J, George S (2015) Governability challenges in sustaining small-scale fisheries in an urban context: a study of Cochin Backwaters, India. In: Jentoft S, Chuenpagdee R (eds) Interactive governance for small-scale fisheries. Springer International Publishing, Dordrecht, pp 85–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Simon D, Schiemer F (2015) Crossing boundaries: complex systems, transdisciplinarity and applied impact agendas. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 12:6–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Song AM, Hickey GM, Krantzberg G et al (2016) Assessing transboundary scientific collaboration in the Great Lakes of North America. J Great Lakes Res 42(1):156–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Song AM, Bower SD, Chuenpagdee R et al (2017a) Inter-sectoral governance of inland fisheries: research needs and foci. In: Song AM, Bower SD, Chuenpagdee R et al (eds) Inter-sectoral governance of inland fisheries, TBTI publication series, E-01/2017, Too Big to Ignore. WorldFish, St John’s, pp 1–17Google Scholar
  48. Song AM, Scholtens J, Chuenpagdee R et al (2017b) Transboundary research in fisheries. Mar Pol 76:8–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Visser LE (2004) Reflections on transdisciplinarity, integrated coastal development, and governance. In: Visser L (ed) Challenging coasts. Transdisciplinary excursions into integrated coastal zone development, Mare publication series 1. Amsterdam University Press, Amsterdam, pp 23–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Welcomme RL, Cowx IG, Lorenzen K (2010) Inland capture fisheries. Philos Trans R Soc B 365(1554):2881–2896CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Young N, Corriveau M, Hinch SG et al (2016) How do potential knowledge users evaluate new claims about a contested resource? problems of power and politics in knowledge exchange and mobilization. J Environ Manage 184:380–388CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shannon D. Bower
    • 1
    Email author
  • Andrew M. Song
    • 2
    • 3
  • Paul Onyango
    • 4
  • Steven J. Cooke
    • 1
  • Jeppe Kolding
    • 5
  1. 1.Fish Ecology and Conservation Physiology Laboratory, Department of BiologyCarleton UniversityOttawaCanada
  2. 2.Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef StudiesJames Cook UniversityTownsvilleAustralia
  3. 3.WorldFishHoniaraSolomon Islands
  4. 4.Department of Aquatic Sciences and FisheriesUniversity of Dar es SalaamDar es SalaamTanzania
  5. 5.Department of BiologyUniversity of BergenBergenNorway

Personalised recommendations