Advertisement

A Study of Urban-Landscape Characteristics of Bhopal City (India) in a Geo-Spatial Environment

  • Anuj Tiwari
  • Prabuddh Kumar MishraEmail author
Chapter
Part of the The Urban Book Series book series (UBS)

Abstract

Bhopal was shortlisted as an aspirant in the smart-cities challenge by the Ministry of Urban Development, Government of India. The Indian government’s Smart Cities model is an innovative sustainable urban-development solution that uses information and communication technologies and other means to improve quality of life, efficiency of urban operation and services, and competitiveness while ensuring that it meets the needs of present and future generations with respect to economic, social, and environmental aspects. To provide a set of strategic and operational research methodologies and systems solutions that cater to the needs of the Bhopal developing sectors, current trends of urbanization with their impact on the health of the city must be studied. This chapter aims to quantify the spatio-temporal patterns of urban expansion and their relationships with land-surface temperature (LST) as a prime indicator of city health in Bhopal. The process was studied using LST and the urban land–cover pattern derived from Landsat TM/ETM satellite data for two decades (1995–2015). In this study, the four major land-cover classes mapped include (i) built-up areas, (ii) water, (iii) vegetation, and (iv) others. Three spectral indices were used to characterize three foremost urban land-use classes: (1) a normalized difference built-up index (NDBI) to characterize built-up areas; (2) a modified normalized difference water index (MNDWI) to signify open water; and (3) a soil-adjusted vegetation index (SAVI) to symbolize green vegetation. Land-use and land-cover (LULC) maps prepared using the NDBI, MNDWI, and SAVI had, respectively, an overall accuracy of 90, 88, and 86% and kappa coefficient of 0.8726, 0.8455, and 0.8212 for 1989, 2006, and 2010. These changes, when attributed in increasing surface temperature in the study region, show a positive correlation between LST and NDBI, a negative correlation between LST and SAVI, and a perfectly negative correlation between NDBI and MNDWI.

Keywords

Land-surface temperature Land-use/cover change Soil-adjusted vegetation index SAVI Modified normalized difference water index MNDWI Normalized difference built-up index NDBI 

References

  1. Aires F, Prigent C, Rossow WB, Rothstein M (2001) A new neural network approach including first-guess for retrieval of atmospheric water vapor, cloud liquid water path, surface temperature and emissivities over land from satellite microwave observations. J Geophys Res 106:14887–14907CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Amiri R, Weng Q, Alimohammadi A, Alavipanah SK (2009) Spatial-temporal dynamics of land surface temperature in relation to fractional vegetation cover and land use/cover in the Tabriz urban area, Iran. Remote Sens Environ 113:2606–2617CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Archer RW (1994) Urban land consolidation for metropolitan Jakarta expansion, 1990–2010. Habitat Intern 18(4):37-52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Artis DA, Carnahan WH (1982) Survey of emissivity variability in Thermography of urban areas. Remote Sens Environ 12(4):313–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Becker F, Li ZL (1990) Temperature-independent spectral indices in thermal infrared bands. Remote Sens Environ 32(1):17–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Carlson TN, Ripley DA (1997) On the relation between NDVI, fractional vegetation cover, and leaf area index. Remote sens Environ 62(3):241–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chen S, Zeng S, Xie C (2000) Remote sensing and GIS for urban growth analysis in China. Photogram Eng Remote Sens 66:593–598Google Scholar
  8. Chen XL, Zhao HM, Li PX, Yin ZY (2006) Remote sensing image—based analysis of the relationship between urban heat Island and land use/cover changes. Remote Sens Environ 104:133–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dai C, Tang L, Jiang P, Lin J (1996) Satellite remote sensing for monitoring urban expansion and environmental remediation. In: Population dynamics and management of urban environment, the 47th IAF congress, Beijing, China, pp 9–16Google Scholar
  10. Dewan AM, Yamaguchi Y (2009) Land use and land cover change in Greater Dhaka, Bangladesh: using remote sensing to promote sustainable urbanization. Appl Geogr 29(3):390–401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dontree S (2010) Relation of land surface temperature (LST) and land use/land cover (LULC) from remotely sensed data in Chiang Mai—Lamphun basin. In: SEAGA conference 2010 Hanoi, Vietnam. Available from: http://seaga.xtreemhost.com/seaga2010/CS5D_Dontree.pdf. Accessed 15 Sept 2012
  12. Dousset B, Gourmelon F (2003) Satellite multi-sensor data analysis of urban surface temperatures and land cover. ISPRS J. Photogram Remote Sens 58(1–2):43–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fan F, Wang Y, Wang Z (2008) Temporal and spatial change detecting (1998–2003) and predicting of land use and land cover in Core corridor of Pearl River Delta (China) by using TM and ETM+ images. Environ Monit Assess 137:127–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Friedl MA, McIver DK, Hodges JC, Zhang XY, Muchoney D, Strahler AH, Woodcock CE, Gopal S, Schneider A, Cooper A, Baccini A (2002) Global land cover mapping from MODIS: algorithms and early results. Remote Sens Environ 83(1-2):287–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gallo KP, Tarpley JD, McNab AL, Karl TR (1995) Assessment of urban heat islands: a satellite perspective. Atmos Res 37:37–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hathout S (2002) The use of GIS for monitoring and predicting urban growth in East and West St Paul, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada. J Environ Manag 66:229–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Herold M, Goldstein NC, Clarke KC (2003) The spatiotemporal form of urban growth: measurement, analysis and modeling. Remote Sens Environ 86:286–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Huete AR (1988) A soil adjusted vegetation index (SAVI). Remote Sens Environ 25:295–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Huete AR, Jackson RD (1987) Suitability of spectral indices for evaluating vegetation characteristics on arid environments. Remote Sens Environ 23:213–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jasuf SK, Wong NH, Hagen E, Anggoro R, Hong Y (2007) The influence of land use on the urban heat island in Singapore. Habitat Int 31:232–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jensen JR, Cowen DC (1999) Remote sensing of urban/suburban infrastructure and socio-economic attributes. Photogram Eng Remote Sens 65(5):611–622Google Scholar
  22. Jiang J, Tian G (2010) Analysis of the impact of land use/land cover change on land surface temperature with remote sensing. Procedia Environ Sci 2:571–575CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kaufman Y, Tanre D (1992) Atmospherically resistant vegetation index (ARVI) for EOS-MODIS. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 30:261–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lambin EF, Turner BL, Geist HJ, Agbola SB, Angelsen A, Bruce JW, George PS (2001) The causes of land-use and land-cover change: moving beyond the myths. Glob Environ Change 11(4):261–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Landsat Project Science Office (2002) Landsat 7 science data user’s handbook. Goddard Space Flight Center, Available from http://ltpwww.gsfc.nasa.gov/IAS/handbook/handbook_toc.html
  26. Lombardo MA (1985) Ilha de Calor Nas Metrópoles: O Exemplo de São Paulo (in Portuguese), 1st edn. Hucitec, São Paulo, Brazil, p 244Google Scholar
  27. Mcfeeters SK (1996) The use of normalized difference water index (NDWI) in the delineation of open water features. Int J Remote Sens 17:1425–1432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mohamed M, Plante R (2002) Remote sensing and geographic information systems (GIS) for developing countries. In: Geoscience and remote sensing symposium 2002. IGARSS’02. 2002 IEEE international vol 4, pp 2285–2287Google Scholar
  29. Owen TW, Carlson TN, Gillies RR (1998) An assessment of satellite remotely sensed land cover parameters in quantitatively describing the climatic effect of urbanization. Int J Remote Sens 19:1663–1681CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Prata AJ, Caselles V, Coll C, Sobrino JA, Ottle C (1995) Thermal remote sensing of land surface temperature from satellites: Current status and future prospects. Remote Sens Rev 12(3–4):175–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Qin Z, Karnieli A, Berliner P (2001) A mono-window algorithm for retrieving land surface temperature from Landsat TM data and its application to the Israel-Egypt border region. Int J Remote Sens 22:3719–3746CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Rao PK (1972) Remote sensing of urban “heat islands” from an environmental satellite. Bull Am Meteor Soc 53:647–648Google Scholar
  33. Ridd MK (1995) Exploring a VIS (vegetation-impervious surface soil) model for urban ecosystem analysis through remote sensing: comparative anatomy for cities. Int J Remote Sens 16(12):2165–2185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rouse JW, Haas RH, Schell JA, Deering DW (1974) Monitoring vegetation system in the great plains with ERTS. Third earth resources technology Satellite-1 symposium, Greenbelt: NASA SP-351, pp 3010–3017Google Scholar
  35. Serra P, Pons X, Sauri D (2008) Land-cover and land-use change in a mediterranean landscape: a spatial analysis of driving forces integrating biophysical and human factors. Appl Geogr 28:189–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sharma R, Ghosh A, Joshi PK (2012) Spatio-temporal footprints of urbanisation in Surat, the Diamond City of India (1990–2009). Environ Monit Assess 273–287.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-012-2792-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Sobrino JA, Raissouni N, Li ZL (2001) A comparative study of land surface emissivity retrieval from NOAA data. Remote Sensing Environ 75(2):256–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Streutker DR (2002) A remote sensing study of the urban heat island of Houston, Texas. Int J Remote Sens 23(13):2595–2608CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Sun D, Pinker RT (2003) Estimation of land surface temperature from a Geostationary Operational Environmental Satellite (GOES-8). J Geophys Res 108:4326–4241Google Scholar
  40. Tan MH, Li XB, Lu CH (2003) An analysis of driving forces of urban land expansion in china. Econ Geogr 5:012Google Scholar
  41. Voogt JA, Oke TR (2003) Thermal remote sensing of urban climates. Remote Sens Environ 86:370–384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Weng Q, Yang S (2004) Managing the adverse thermal effects of urban development in a densely populated Chinese city. J Environ Manag 70(2):145–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Weng Q, Lu D, Schubring J (2004) Estimation of land surface temperature–vegetation abundance relationship for urban heat island studies. Remote sens Environ 89(4):467–483CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Weng Q, Lu D, Liang B (2006) Urban surface biophysical descriptors and land surface temperature variations. Photogram Eng Remote Sens 72(11):1275–1286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Xiao H, Weng Q (2007) The impact of land use and land cover changes on land surface temperature in a karst area of China. J Environ Manag 85:245–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Xiao J, Shen Y, Ge J, Tateishi R, Tang C, Liang Y, Huang Z (2006) Evaluating urban expansion and land use change in Shijiazhuang, China, by using GIS and remote sensing. Landscape Urban Plann 75(1):69–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Xu H (2006) Modification of normalised difference water index (NDWI) to enhance open water features in remotely sensed imagery. Int J Remote Sens 27:3025–3033CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Yeh AGO, Li X (1997) An integrated remote sensing-GIS approach in the monitoring and evaluation of rapid urban growth for sustainable development in the Pearl River Delta, China. Int Plann Stud 2:193–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Zha Y, Gao J, Ni S (2003) Use of normalized difference built-up index in automatically mapping urban areas from TM imagery. Int J Remote Sens 24(3):583–659CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Zhou W, Huang G, Cadenasso ML (2011) Does spatial configuration matter? Understanding the effects of land cover pattern on land surface temperature in urban landscapes. Landscape Urban Plann 102(1):54–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Geomatics SectionIndian Institute of TechnologyRoorkeeIndia
  2. 2.Department of GeographyShivaji College, University of DelhiNew DelhiIndia

Personalised recommendations