Anticipating and Managing Change in Large Organization Strategic Environment: Using Foresight and Organizational Policy to Enable Futures Literate Decision-Making

  • Anna Sacio-Szymańska
  • Kacper Nosarzewski


The chapter presents a comparative study of two cases. Case A refers to strategic foresight implemented in a large private company from the fast-moving consumer goods (FMCG) sector; in this instance, a producer of beverages. Case B portrays organizational foresight practices implemented in a scientific institution, which conducts applied research within manufacturing and maintenance fields. Both organizations are based in Poland and are of similar size. Both share the same motivation to uptake foresight as means of capturing technological change and supporting strategic investment decisions. It is the actual methodology of foresight, its outcomes and follow-up activities that differ to a great extent in the two entities. The reason to compare such diverse case studies of organizational foresight is to share valuable lessons learned, with a view to point out factors that do or do not allow an organization to take full advantage of internal foresight processes.


Organizational foresight Fast-moving consumer goods Advanced manufacturing technologies Priorities for research Consumer trends Emerging technologies 


  1. Becker, P. (2003). Corporate foresight in Europe: A first overview. RTD K-2 Scientific and technological foresight: Relations with the IPTS. Belgium: European Communities.Google Scholar
  2. Bednarczyk, Z. (2016, October 29–30). From trend analysis to strategic foresight implementation of a trends-based early warning system in BEWA sp. z o.o. Future Engineering Conference, Starachowice. Retrieved from:
  3. Boe-Lillegraven, S., & Monterde, S. (2015). Exploring the cognitive value of technology foresight: The case of the Cisco Technology Radar. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 101, 62–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bootz, J. P. (2010). Strategic foresight and organizational learning: A survey and critical analysis. Technological Forecast Social Change, 77, 1588–1594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Burmeister, K., Neef, A., & Beyers, B. (2004). Corporate foresight. Unternehmen gestante Zukunft. Hamburg: Murmann Verlag.Google Scholar
  6. Burrus, D. (2014). Improve planning by separating hard trends from soft trends. Retrieved November 6, 2017, from:
  7. Cunha, M. P., Palma, P., & Costa, N. (2006). Fear of foresight: Knowledge and ignorance in organizational foresight. Futures, 38(8), 942–955.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Daheim, C., & Uerz, G. (2008). Corporate foresight in Europe: From trend based logics to open foresight. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 20(3), 321–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Destatte, P. (2010). Foresight: A major tool in tackling sustainable development. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 77(9), 1575–1587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. De Toni, A. F., Siagri, R., & Battistella, C. (2015). Anticipare il Futuro: Corporate Foresight. Biblioteca dell’Economia d’Azienda. Milano: Egea S.p.A.Google Scholar
  11. Grim, T. (2009). Foresight maturity model, achieving best practices in the foresight field. Journal of Futures Studies, 13(4), 69–80.Google Scholar
  12. Hiltunen, E. (2013). Foresight and innovation: How companies are coping with the future. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kononiuk, A., & Sacio-Szymańska, A. (2015). Assesing the maturity level of foresight in Polish companies—A regional perspective. European Journal of Futures Research, 3, 3–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Leitner, K. H., & Warden, C. (2004). Managing and reporting knowledge-based resources and processes in research organisations: Specifics, lessons learned and perspectives. Management Accounting Research, 15, 33–51. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Mazurkiewicz, A., & Poteralska, B. (2009). Sustainable development of Poland. In J. Kleer & A. Wierzbicki (Eds.), National foresight programme Poland 2020: Discussion of scenario principles. Polish Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
  16. Miller, R. (2007). Futures literacy: A hybrid strategic scenario method. ScienceDirect—Futures, 39(4), 341–362. Retrieved November 6, 2017, from: Scholar
  17. Notten, P. (2005). Writing on the wall: Scenario development in times of discontinuity. Amsterdam: Scholar
  18. Phaal, R., & Farrukh, C. (2000). Technology planning survey—Results (pp. 5–26). Centre for Technical management, Institute for Manufacturing (Project report). Cambridge: University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
  19. Poteralska, B., & Sacio-Szymańska, A. (2014). Evaluation of technology foresight projects. European Journal of Futures Research, 2, 26. Scholar
  20. Rohrbeck, R. (2010). Corporate foresight: Towards a maturity model for the future orientation of a firm. Heidelberg: Physica-Verlag.Google Scholar
  21. Sacio-Szymańska, A. (2011). Technology foresight as a tool for setting priority R&D directions for the strategic research institutes. Cracow University of Economics (Doctoral thesis in Polish). Retrieved November 6, 2017, from:
  22. Sacio-Szymańska, A., & Kuciński, J. (2009). National foresight programme “Poland 2020”. EFMN Brief No. 121. In The European Foresight Monitoring Network Collection of EFMN Briefs—Part 2. Brussels: European Commission Directorate General for Research Cooperation.Google Scholar
  23. Van der Heijden, K. (2004). Can internally generated futures accelerate organizational learning? Foresight, 36(2), 145–159.Google Scholar
  24. Wolfe, R. (2016). Breakthrough methods for visioning. Retrieved November 6, 2017, from:

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anna Sacio-Szymańska
    • 1
  • Kacper Nosarzewski
    • 2
  1. 1.ITeE-PIB—Institute for Sustainable Technologies—National Research InstituteRadomPoland
  2. 2.4CF, Strategic ForesightWarsawPoland

Personalised recommendations