Advertisement

Foresight as a Facilitator for Innovative Capability and Organizational Adaptability: Insights from a Family Firm in the HVAC Industry

  • Reimo JahnEmail author
  • Hans Koller
Chapter

Abstract

Novel business models and increasing innovation speed push global competition in technology-driven markets. Especially, small- and medium-sized family firms struggle with allocating resources in order to cope with volatile market conditions and high-frequency innovations. Foresight as early detection of environmental change has been proven efficient for preparing companies for the future. This chapter reports on a nine-month foresight program conducted with participants from several departments within STULZ, a family firm in the industry of heating, ventilation and air conditioning (HVAC). Findings from in-depth case-work and semi-structured interviews show that the foresight program encouraged innovative thinking among employees and gave space for creative exchange. In summary, STULZ employees identified 29 future scenarios, eight early warning signals as well as innovative projections for three novel products, four service proposals, and 15 processes. Also, the foresight program affected processes of change and established employees’ confidence in STULZ’s adaptability. The chapter adds insights on the significance of long-term management strategies, as well as, future-oriented organizational policy to sustain business success among the microcosm of a family firm.

Keywords

Corporate foresight Futures thinking Technology change Change management Organizational policy 

References

  1. Ansoff, H. I. (1975). Managing strategic surprise by response to weak signals. California Management Review, 18(2), 21–33.  https://doi.org/10.2307/41164635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barr, P. S., Stimpert, J. L., & Huff, A. S. (1992). Cognitive change, strategic action, and organizational renewal. Strategic Management Journal, 13(1), 15–36.  https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250131004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bersch, J., Gottschalk, S., Mueller, B., & Niefert, M. (2014). The Mannheim Enterprise Panel (MUP) and firm statistics for Germany. ZEW—Centre for European Economic Research Discussion Paper, no. 14–104.  https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2548385.
  4. Blackman, D. A., & Henderson, S. (2004). How foresight creates unforeseen futures: The role of doubting. Futures, 36(2), 253–266.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-3287(03)00144-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bradfield, R., Wright, G., Burt, G., Cairns, G., & Van der Heijden, K. (2005). The origins and evolution of scenario techniques in long range business planning. Futures, 37(8), 795–812.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2005.01.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Burt, G. (2007). Why are we surprised at surprises? Integrating disruption theory and system analysis with the scenario methodology to help identify disruptions and discontinuities. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 74(6), 731–749.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2006.08.010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chesbrough, H. (2006). Open innovation models: How to thrive in the new innovation landscape. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School.Google Scholar
  8. Costanzo, L. A. (2004). Strategic foresight in a high-speed environment. Futures, 36(2), 219–235.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-3287(03)00145-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cuhls, K. (2003). From forecasting to foresight processes? New participative foresight activities in Germany. Journal of Forecasting, 22(2/3), 93–111.  https://doi.org/10.1002/for.848.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Day, G. S., & Schoemaker, P. J. (2004). Driving through the fog: Managing at the edge. Long Range Planning, 37(2), 127–142.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2004.01.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fang, S. R., Chou, C. H., Yang, S. M., & Ou, C. C. (2012). Enhancing innovation through learning: The roles of market orientation and interorganisational knowledge stores. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 24(3), 285–298.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2012.655414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gem–nden, H. G., Kock, A. (2009). Bei radikalen Innovationen gelten andere Spielregeln [There are different rules with radical innovations]. In P. E. Harland & M. Schwarz-Geschka (Eds.), Immer eine Idee voraus: Wie innovative Unternehmen Kreativit–t systematisch nutzen [Always an idea ahead: How innovative firms make systematic use of creativity] (pp. 31–52). Zittau: Harland.Google Scholar
  13. Gomez-Mejia, L. R., Haynes, K. T., Nunez-Nickel, M., Jacobson, K. J., & Moyano-Fuentes, J. (2007). Socioemotional wealth and business risks in family controlled firms: Evidence from Spanish olive oil mills. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52(1), 106–137.  https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.52.1.106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gottschalk, S. (2014). Die volkswirtschaftliche Bedeutung der Familienunternehmen [The economic significance of family firms]. Stiftung Familienunternehmen. Accessed 31 August 2016. http://www.familienunternehmen.de/media/public/pdf/publikationen-studien/studien/Studie_Stiftung_Familienunternehmen_Volkswirtschaftliche-Bedeutung_Berichtsband.pdf.
  15. Graves, C., & Thomas, J. (2008). Determinants of the internationalization pathways of family firms: An examination of family influence. Family Business Review, 21(2), 151–167.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.2008.00119.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gudmundson, D., Tower, C. B., & Hartman, E. A. (2003). Innovation in small businesses: Cul-ture and ownership structure do matter. Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship, 8(1), 1–17.Google Scholar
  17. Heger, T., & Boman, M. (2015). Networked foresight: The case of EIT ICT labs. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 101, 147–164.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2014.02.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Heger, T., & Rohrbeck, R. (2012). Strategic foresight for collaborative exploration of new business fields. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 79(5), 819–831.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2011.11.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Karp, T. (2004). Learning the steps of the dance of change: Improving change capabilities by integrating futures studies and positive organisational scholarship. Foresight, 6(6), 349–355.  https://doi.org/10.1108/14636680410569920.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kets de Vries, M. (1993). The dynamics of family controlled firms: The good and the bad news. Organizational Dynamics, 21(3), 59–71.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0090-2616(93)90071-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Koller, H. (2008). Intercultural technology intelligence: A process and communication oriented approach. In R. Meckl, M. Rongping, & M. Fanchen (Eds.), Technology and innovation management (pp. 71–82). Munich and Vienna: Oldenbourg.Google Scholar
  22. Laamanen, T., & Wallin, J. (2009). Cognitive dynamics of capability development paths. Journal of Management Studies, 46(6), 950–981.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00823.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. MacKay, R., & McKiernan, P. (2004). The role of hindsight in foresight: Refining strategic reasoning. Futures, 36(2), 161–179.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-3287(03)00147-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mendon–a, S., & Sapio, B. (2009). Managing foresight in changing organisational settings: Introducing new perspectives and practices. Technology Analysis & Strategic Manage-ment, 21(3), 285–289.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09537320902750558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Miller, D., Le Breton-Miller, I., & Scholnick, B. (2008). Stewardship vs. stagnation: An empirical comparison of small family and non-family businesses. Journal of Management Studies, 45(1), 50–78.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2007.00718.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Nieto, M. J., Santamaria, L., & Fernandez, Z. (2015). Understanding the innovation behavior of family firms. Journal of Small Business Management, 53(2), 382–399.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jsbm.12075.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. –ner, M. A., Benson, C., & Beser, S. G. (2014). Linking organizational change management and organizational foresight. Strategic Change, 23(3/4), 185–203.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jsc.1970.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Reger, G. (2001). Technology foresight in companies: From an indicator to a network and process perspective. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 13(4), 533–553.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09537320127286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Rohrbeck, R., & Gem–nden, H. G. (2011). Corporate foresight: Its three roles in enhancing the innovation capacity of a firm. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 78(2), 231–243.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2010.06.019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Rohrbeck, R., & Schwarz, J. O. (2013). The value contribution of strategic foresight: Insights from an empirical study of large European companies. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 80(8), 1593–1606.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2013.01.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Rothwell, R., & Dodgson, M. (1993). Technology-based SMEs: Their role in industrial and economic change. International Journal of Technology Management, 8–22. Special publication on small firms and innovation.Google Scholar
  32. Ruff, F. (2006). Corporate foresight: Integrating the future business environment into innovation and strategy. International Journal of Technology Management, 34(3–4), 278–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319–1350.  https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Van der Duin, P. (2006). Qualitative futures research for innovation. Delft: Eburon.Google Scholar
  35. Van der Heijden, K. (2005). Scenarios: The art of strategic conversation (2nd ed.). Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  36. Vecchiato, R. (2015). Creating value through foresight: First mover advantages and strategic agility. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 101, 25–36.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2014.08.016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Vecchiato, R., & Roveda, C. (2010). Foresight in corporate organisations. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 22(1), 99–112.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09537320903438179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Villalonga, B., & Amit, R. (2009). How are U.S. family firms controlled? Review of Financial Studies, 22(8), 3047–3091.  https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhn080.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Von der Gracht, H. A., Vennemann, C. R., & Darkow, I. L. (2010). Corporate foresight and innovation management: A portfolio-approach in evaluating organizational development. Futures, 42(4), 380–393.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2009.11.023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. West, J., Salter, A., Vanhaverbeke, W., & Chesbrough, H. (2014). Open innovation: The next decade. Research Policy, 43(5), 805–811.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.03.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for Technology and Innovation ManagementHelmut Schmidt UniversityHamburgGermany

Personalised recommendations