Defending the Delta: Practices of Foresight at Dutch Infrastructure Providers

  • Patrick van der Duin
  • Andreas Ligtvoet


Given the longtime horizons of investments and strategic decisions among Dutch infrastructure providers, the future is a very relevant topic to all of them. The purpose of this chapter is to describe how these organizations practice foresight. It turns out that the way these organizations carry out foresight can vary. Some organizations use scenario thinking, others rely more on quantitative methods for data analysis. Some start their foresight process by analyzing problems, while others are more vision-driven. External development on the future of infrastructures is significant, and all infrastructure providers have increased their focus on the relationship between their business and societal context. In addition to their foresight activities, infrastructure providers also prepare themselves for uncertain futures by making their organization more flexible, which has a positive impact on their strategic adaptivity.


Foresight Scenario-building Infrastructures Organizational partnerships Organizational management 


  1. Bolton, R., & Foxon, T. J. (2015). Infrastructure transformation as a socio-technical process—Implications for the governance of energy distribution networks in the UK. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 90, 538–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Egyedi, T., & Spirco, J. (2011). Standards in transitions: Catalyzing infrastructure change. Futures, 43, 947–960.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Fidler, D. (2011). Foresight defined as a component of strategic management. Futures, 43, 540–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Havas, A., & Weber, K. M. (2017). The ‘fit’ between forward-looking activities and the innovation policy governance sub-system: A framework to explore potential impacts. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 115, 327–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hickford, A. J., Nicholls, R. J., Otto, A., Hall, J. W., Blainey, S. P., Tran, M., & Baruah, P. (2015). Creating an ensemble of future strategies for national infrastructure provision. Futures, 66, 13–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Janssen, M., & Van der Voort, H. (2016). Adaptive governance: Towards a stable, accountable and responsive government. Government Information Quarterly, 33, 1–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Kwakkel, J. H., & Van der Plas, J. W. G. M. (2011). Evaluation of infrastructure planning approaches: An analogy with medicine. Futures, 43, 934–946.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Lebaka, L., Hernantes, J., & Sarriegi, J. M. (2016). A holistic framework for building critical infrastructure resilience. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 103, 21–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Loorbach, D., Frantzeskaki, N., & Thissen, W. (2010). Introduction to the special section: Infrastructure and transitions. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 77, 1195–1202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Schuckmann, S. W., Gnatzy, T., Darkow, I., & Van der Gracht, H. (2012). Analysis of factors influencing the development of transport infrastructure until the year 2030—A Delphi based scenario study. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 79, 1373–1387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Turoff, M., Bañul, V. A., Plotnick, L., Hiltz, S. R., & De la Huerga, M. R. (2016). A collaborative dynamics scenario model for the interaction of critical infrastructures. Futures, 84, 23–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Van der Duin, P. (2006). Qualitative futures research for innovation. Delft: Eburon.Google Scholar
  13. Van der Duin, P. (2016). Foresight in organizations: Methods and tools. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Vecchiato, R., & Roveda, C. (2010). Strategic foresight in corporate organizations: Handling the effect and response uncertainty of technology and social drivers of change. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 77, 1527–1539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Walsh, C. L., Glendinning, S., Castán-Broto, V., Dewberry, E., & Powell, M. (2015). Are wildcard events on infrastructure systems opportunities for transformational change? Futures, 67, 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. World Economic Forum. The Global Competitiveness Report 2017–2018. Geneva: World Economic Forum.Google Scholar
  17. Zanni, A. M., Goulden, M., Ryley, R., & Dingwall, R. (2017). Improving scenario methods in infrastructure planning: A case of long distance travel and mobility in the UK under extreme weather uncertainty and a changing climate. Futures, 115, 180–197.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The Netherlands Study Center for Technology TrendsThe HagueThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Technopolis GroupAmsterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations