Foresight Renewal: Beginning and Ending with Foresight in the Florida and Ohio Army National Guard Organizations

  • David M. Stehlik
  • James P. Foot


This chapter examines the recent embedding of foresight techniques within the Florida and Ohio Army National Guard organizations’ strategic planning processes. Each state’s decision to move strategic planning in that direction was unique—as are their foresight methodologies and training. Furthermore, each is being recognized by their sector peers for its unique success story. The kind of foresight techniques and implementation methods—and the sustained organizational support for such—that supports anticipation amid rapid change, even working for massive organizations with profoundly rich organizational histories and cultures, are discussed in detail. For Florida, it was the inclusion of specific environmental scanning efforts, and for Ohio, it was the use of future scenarios. The two techniques are providing tremendous value to each organization by helping clarify their ambiguous and ever-evolving strategic environments, informing and safeguarding the relevance of their long-term strategic plans. Moreover, these new process efforts are not simply shaping the organizations’ strategic plans; perhaps more importantly, they are also shaping the cultures and mentalities of the next generation of the National Guard’s future-oriented leaders.


Foresight Strategic planning Process U.S. military 



The authors would like to thank Lieutenant Colonel Jerry B. Glass, Florida National Guard and Major Danielle A. Reese, Ohio National Guard for their assistance in the completion of this case study.


  1. About Evergreen. (n.d.). U.S. Department of Homeland Security: United States Coast Guard. Retrieved from:
  2. Baldrige Performance Excellence Program. (2015). 2015–2016 Baldrige excellence framework: A systems approach to improving your organization’s performance. Gaithersburg, MD: U.S. Department of Commerce, National Institute of Standards and Technology.
  3. Blazey, M. L., & Grizzell, P. L. (2017). Insights to performance excellence 2017–2018: Using the Baldrige framework and other integrated management systems (p. 24). Milwaukee, WI: Quality Press.Google Scholar
  4. Calvert, D. (2017, May 5). How the U.S. Army recruits and retains millennials: Lessons from the military on making the most of your ambitious millennial workforce. Kellogg Insight. Retrieved from:
  5. Cronk, T. M. (2017, September 18). Secretary Mattis issues interim guidance on transgender personnel service. Department of Defense. Retrieved from:
  6. Krause, H. (2017, September 20). Budget issues: Budget uncertainty and disruptions affect timing of agency spending. U.S. Government Accountability Office. Retrieved from:
  7. National Institute of Standards and Technology. (2017). 2017–2018 Baldrige excellence framework: A systems approach to improving your organization’s performance (pp. 7–41). Gaithersburg, MD: NIST. Retrieved from:
  8. Quinn, R., Modly, T., Lehman, C., & Weber, T. (2017, November). Global defense perspectives 2017: Updating the map of defense prioritization and posture in a challenging world. Pwc Global. Retrieved from:
  9. TC 7-102 Operational Environment Considerations for Training and Education Development. (2013, May). Maneuver leader’s self study program. Retrieved from:

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • David M. Stehlik
    • 1
  • James P. Foot
    • 2
  1. 1.Keith Busse School of Business and Entrepreneurial LeadershipUniversity of Saint FrancisFort WayneUSA
  2. 2.Office of Business TransformationUnited States Army National GuardArlington CountyUSA

Personalised recommendations