Advertisement

Climate Change Adaptation of Local Communities Along Heavily Damaged Coasts

  • An Thinh Nguyen
  • Luc Hens
Chapter
Part of the Springer Climate book series (SPCL)

Abstract

This chapter analyzes how major stakeholders (farmers, fishermen, fish traders, and local authorities) living in the coastal villages of Ky Anh assess climate change-associated hazards. A two-round Delphi approach allows to rank a series of effects and mitigation measures. The results contribute to a vision on local adaptation actions and policy to foster the capacity and the resilience of major local groups.

The chapter is structured in two main parts. It takes off with a description of the two Delphi rounds which were organized on questions and statements which fit in the logic of a drivers-pressure-state-impact-responses (DPSIR) model. After Kendall ’s test showing a strong coherence in the answers of the stakeholder groups, the data are restructured in vision on priority action for the region .

Keywords

Local perception Stakeholders Gross costs Livelihood capitals Tropical storm Trend analysis Ky Anh coast 

References

  1. Colagiuri, R., Boylan, S., & Morrice, E. (2015). Research priorities for NCD prevention and climate change: An international Delphi survey. Environmental Research and Public Health, 12(10), 12941–12957.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cruz, R. V., Harasawa, H., Lal, M., Wu, S., Anokhin, Y., Punsalmaa, B., et al. (2007). Asia: Climate change 2007: Impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. In M. L. Parry et al. (Eds.), Contribution of working group II to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change (pp. 469–506). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Doria, M.F., Boyd, E., Tompkins, E.L., & Adger, W.N. (2009). Using expert elicitation to define successful adaptation to climate change. Environmental Science and Policy, 12(7), 810–819.Google Scholar
  4. EEA. (1995). Europe’s environment: The Dobris assessment. Copenhagen: European Environmental Agency, 8 pages.Google Scholar
  5. Eriksen, S., Aldunce, P., Bahinipati, C. S., Martins, R., Molefe, J. I., Nhemachena, C., O'brien, K., Olorunfemi, F., Park, J., Sygna, L., & Ulsrud, K. (2011). When not every response to climate change is a good one: Identifying principles for sustainable adaptation. Climate and Development, 3(1), 7–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. IPCC. (2007). Climate change 2007: Impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. In M. L. Parry, O. F. Canziani, J. P. Palutikof, P. J. van der Linden, & C. E. Hanson (Eds.), Contribution of working group II to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 976 pages.Google Scholar
  7. Lewison, R. L., Rudd, M. A., Al-Hayek, W., Baldwin, C., Beger, M., Lieske, S. N., Jones, C., Satumanatpan, S., Junchompoo, C., & Hines, E. (2016). How the DPSIR framework can be used for structuring problems and facilitating empirical research in coastal systems. Environmental Science and Policy, 56, 110–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Newton, A., & Weichselgartner, J. (2014). Hotspots of coastal vulnerability: A DPSIR analysis to find societal pathways and responses. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 140, 123–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Njoroge, J. M. (2014). An enhanced framework for regional tourism sustainable adaptation to climate change. Tourism Management Perspectives, 12, 23–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • An Thinh Nguyen
    • 1
  • Luc Hens
    • 2
  1. 1.Research Institute for Resources and Climate ChangeHanoi University of Natural Resources and EnvironmentHanoiVietnam
  2. 2.Vlaamse Instelling voor Technologisch Onderzoek (VITO)BrusselsBelgium

Personalised recommendations