Advertisement

Fog Computing pp 107-130 | Cite as

Performance Enhancement of Fog Computing Using SDN and NFV Technologies

  • J. Pushpa
  • Pethuru Raj
Chapter

Abstract

The concept of Edge or Fog Computing is fast emerging as a powerful Computing paradigm for real-time data capture, processing, decision-making and actuation. The accumulation of Edge devices in different forms in multiple environments is the key motivation for the surging popularity of Fog Computing. In this chapter, we concentrate on identifying the important parameter of device performance in Fog Computing environments. This measurement metric helps to analyse the Quality of Service (QoS) attributes for Fog or Edge applications. The Fog device connectivity guarantees the goal of low latency for fulfilling time-sensitive applications and use cases. However, there are issues with the participating devices and the connectivity between devices and the intermediaries such as the IoT gateway, broker or the middleware. The primary communication happens in wireless mode, and hence, there are several variables that can intermittently go wrong. The purpose of this chapter is to expose the various performance issues being associated with the Fog Computing model and to convey the ways and means of establishing and sustaining the goal of high performance.

Keywords

Performance enhancement Edge computing QoS DDS SDN NFV RTP Management policy LTE LPWAN 

References

  1. 1.
    Tordera EM, Masip X, Garcia Alminana J, Farre J (2016) What is a fog node? a tutorial on current concepts towards a common definition, networking and internet architecture (cs.NI). Cornell University Library, cite as: arXiv:1611.09193v1
  2. 2.
    Iorga M, Feldman L, Barton R, Martin MJ, Goren N, Mahmoudi C (2017) The NIST definition of Fog Computing, NIST SP 800-191 (DRAFT). www.csrc.nist.gov/csrc/media/publications/sp/800-191/draft/
  3. 3.
    Bonomi F, Milito R, Zhu J, Addepall S (2012) Fog Computing and its role in the internet of things. In: Proceedings of MCC’12, Helsinki, Finland, pp 13–16, 17 Aug 2012Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    OpenFog Consortium (2017) OpenFog reference architecture for Fog Computing, While paper published USA OPFRA001.020817, Feb 2017Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    i-Scoop (2017) The internet of things in 2017: trends, technologies, market data and evolutions. www.i-scoop.eu/internet-of-things-guide/connectivity-networks-Fog-Computing-internet-of-things/. Accessed 22 Dec 2017
  6. 6.
    García-Pérez CA, Pedro M (2017) Experimental evaluation of Fog Computing techniques to reduce latency in LTE networks. Emerg Telecommun Technol (inpress). http://dx.doi.org/10.2759/54788, http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ett.3201
  7. 7.
    Mohan N, Kangasharju J (2017) Edge-Fog cloud: a distributed cloud for the internet of things computations. In: IEEE Cloudification of the Internet of Things, arXiv:1702.06335v2
  8. 8.
    Westbase.io (2016) Fog Computing versus cloud Computing what’s the difference, www.westbaseuk.com/news/Fog-Computing-vs-cloud-Computing-whats-thedifference/. Accessed 30 Nov 2017
  9. 9.
    Dastjerdi AV, Gupta H, Calheiros RN, Ghosh S, Buyya R (2016) In: Buyya R, Dastjerdi AV (eds) Fog Computing: principles, architectures, and applications, pp 61–75. Morgan Kaufmann, New York. Cite as arXiv:1601.02752CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ai Y, Peng M, Zhang K (2017) Edge cloud Computing technologies for the internet of things: a primer. Digital Commun Netw, Chongqing University of Posts and Telecommuniocations. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V, July 2017Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Yi S, Hao Z, Qin Z, Li Q (2015) Fog Computing: platform and applications. In: Third IEEE workshop on hot topics in web systems and technologies (HotWeb), pp 73–78Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Satyanarayanan M, Bahl P, Caceres R, Davies N (2009) The case for vm-based cloudlets in mobile Computing. IEEE Pervasive Comput 8(4):14–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Li C, Qin Z, Novak E, Li Q, Senior Member (2017) Securing SDN infrastructure of IoT–fog networks from MitM attacks. In: ICSEA 2017: The twelfth international conference on software engineering advances. ISBN: 978-1-61208-590-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Jiang Q, Tang R, Liu P, Qiu Y, Xu H (2014) Research on dynamic data fusion algorithm based on context awareness. In: Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE international conference on progress in informatics and computing. IEEE, pp 529–534.  https://doi.org/10.1109/pic.2014.6972391
  15. 15.
    Shah-Mansouri H, Wong VWS (2017) Hierarchical fog-cloud computing for IoT systems: a computation offloading game. Cite as: arXiv:1710.06089v1 [cs.DC] Oct 2017
  16. 16.
    Hirve R (2017) What is Fog Computing? why Fog Computing trending now? https://www.linkedin.com/today/author/rhirve
  17. 17.
    Byers CC, Wetterwald P (2015) Fog Computing distributing data and intelligence for resiliency and scale necessary for IoT: the Internet of Things. In: Symposium Ubiquity, pp 1–12.  https://doi.org/10.1145/2822875CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Peng G (2003) CDN: Content Distribution Network, Technical Report TR-125. Experimental Computer Systems Lab, Department of Computer Science, State University of New York, Stony Brook, NY. http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/peng03cdn.html

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Visvesvaraya Technological UniversityBelgaumIndia
  2. 2.Site Reliability Engineering (SRE) DivisionReliance Jio Infocomm Ltd.BangaloreIndia

Personalised recommendations