Maternal Outcomes in the Context of Free Maternal Healthcare Provisioning in North Central and South Western Nigeria

  • Anthony AjayiEmail author
  • Wilson Akpan


Most maternal deaths are avoidable, if quality life-saving interventions are available and accessible. However, inequality in access remains a major hindrance, particularly in low and middle-income countries. Many countries in sub-Saharan Africa, have introduced free maternal healthcare to improve the utilisation of skilled birth facilities and reduce inequalities of access to these and other maternal healthcare services. However, poor utilisation rates and disparities in access to maternal healthcare services persist, and these are not adequately explained by the varied challenges associated with policy implementation. This paper examines maternal outcomes in the context of free maternal healthcare in Nigeria, which accounts for fully 19% of global maternal deaths. Specifically, it examines the effects of free maternal health policy on maternal healthcare utilisation, inequality in access to maternal healthcare services, and health system function, as well as user perceptions and experiences of free maternal healthcare services in two main regions of the country. In the main, the paper argues that there are other barriers to service use, apart from financial ones, and addressing issues related to culture and contextual differences are crucial for reducing inequality in access to maternal healthcare.


Free maternal health Inequality Utilisation Nigeria 


  1. Aboagye, E., & Agyemang, O. S. (2013). Maternal health-seeking behavior: The role of financing and organization of health services in Ghana. Global Journal of Health Science, 5(5), 67–79. Scholar
  2. Akashi, H., Yamada, T., Huot, E., Kanal, K., & Sugimoto, T. (2004). User fees at a public hospital in Cambodia: Effects on hospital performance and provider attitude. Social Science and Medicine, 58, 553–564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arthur, E. (2012). Wealth and antenatal care use: Implications for maternal health care utilisation in Ghana. Health Economics Review, 2(1), 14. Scholar
  4. Atchessi, N., Ridde, V., & Zunzunegui, M.-V. (2016). User fees exemptions alone are not enough to increase indigent Use of healthcare services. Health Policy and Planning, 31(5), 674–681. Scholar
  5. Atinga, R. A., & Baku, A. A. (2013). Determinants of antenatal care quality in Ghana. International Journal of Social Economics, 40(10), 852–865. Scholar
  6. Bankole, A., Sedgh, G., Okonofua, F., Imarhiagbe, C., Hussain, R., & Wulf, D. (2009). Barriers to safe motherhood in Nigeria. Washington, DC: Guttmacher Institute.Google Scholar
  7. Ben Ameur, A., Ridde, V., Bado, A. R., Ingabire, M.-G., & Queuille, L. (2012). User fee exemptions and excessive household spending for normal delivery in Burkina Faso: The need for careful implementation. BMC Health Services Research, 12(1), 412. Scholar
  8. Bosu, W., Bell, J. S., Armar-klemesu, M., & Tornui, J. A. (2007). Effect of delivery care user fee exemption policy on institutional maternal deaths in the central and volta regions of ghana. Ghana Medical Journal, 41(3), 118–124.Google Scholar
  9. Chama-Chiliba, C. M., & Koch, S. F. (2016). An assessment of the effect of user fee policy reform on facility-based deliveries in rural Zambia. BMC Research Notes, 9(1), 504. Scholar
  10. Daponte, A., Guidozzi, F., & Marineanu, A. (2000). Maternal mortality in a tertiary center after introduction of free antenatal care. International Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, 71(2), 127–133. Scholar
  11. De Allegri, M., Ridde, V., Louis, V. R., Sarker, M., Tiendrebéogo, J., Yé, M., et al. (2011). Determinants of utilisation of maternal care services after the reduction of user fees: A case study from rural Burkina Faso. Health Policy, 99(3), 210–218. Scholar
  12. Deininger, K., & Mpuga, P. (2005). Economic and welfare impact of the abolition of health user fees: Evidence from Uganda. Journal of African Economies, 14(1), 55–91. Scholar
  13. Donnay, F. (2000). Maternal survival in developing countries: What has been done, what can be achieved in the next decade. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 70(1), 89–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dzakpasu, S., Powell-Jackson, T., & Campbell, O. M. R. (2014). Impact of user fees on maternal health service utilization and related health outcomes: a systematic review. Health Policy and Planning, 29(2), 137–150. Scholar
  15. Echoka, E., Kombe, Y., Dubourg, D., Makokha, A., Evjen-Olsen, B., Mwangi, M., et al. (2013). Existence and functionality of emergency obstetric care services at district level in Kenya: Theoretical coverage versus reality. BMC Health Services Research, 13(1), 113. Scholar
  16. El-Khoury, M., Hatt, L., & Gandaho, T. (2012). User fee exemptions and equity in access to caesarean sections: An analysis of patient survey data in Mali. International Journal for Equity in Health, 11(49), 1–7. Scholar
  17. Ezegwui, H., Onoh, R., Ikeako, L., Onyebuchi, A., Umeora, O., Ezeonu, P., et al. (2013). Investigating maternal mortality in a public teaching hospital, Abakaliki, Ebonyi State, Nigeria. Annals of Medical and Health Sciences Research, 3(1), 75–80. Scholar
  18. Gabrysch, S., & Campbell, O. M. R. (2009). Still too far to walk: Literature review of the determinants of delivery service use. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 9(1), 34. Scholar
  19. Hatt, L. E., Makinen, M., Madhavan, S., & Conlon, C. M. (2013). Effects of user fee exemptions on the provision and use of maternal health services: A review of literature. Journal of Health, Population, and Nutrition, 31(4 Supplement, 2), S67–S80.Google Scholar
  20. Houle, B., Clark, S. J., Kahn, K., Tollman, S., & Yamin, A. (2015). The impacts of maternal mortality and cause of death on children’s risk of dying in rural South Africa: evidence from a population based surveillance study (1992–2013). Reproductive Health, 12(Supplement 1), S7. Scholar
  21. Jacobsen, K. H., Abdirahman, H. A., Ansumana, R., Bockarie, A. S., Bangura, U., Jimmy, D. H., et al. (2012). Home birth and hospital birth trends in Bo, Sierra Leone. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 91(6), 750–753. Scholar
  22. Johnson, F. A. (2016). A geospatial analysis of the impacts of maternity care fee payment policies on the uptake of skilled birth care in Ghana. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 16(1), 41. Scholar
  23. Koblinsky, M., Matthews, Z., Hussein, J., Mavalankar, D., Mridha, M. K., Anwar, I., et al. (2006). Going to scale with professional skilled care. The Lancet, 368(9544), 1377–1386. Scholar
  24. Kruk, M. E., Mbaruku, G., Rockers, P. C., & Galea, S. (2008). User fee exemptions are not enough: Out-of-pocket payments for ‘free’ delivery services in rural Tanzania. Tropical Medicine & International Health, 13(12), 1442–1451. Scholar
  25. Lagarde, M. (2008). The impact of user fees on health service utilization in low- and middle-income countries: how strong is the evidence? Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 86(11), 839–848. Scholar
  26. Lagarde, M., Barroy, H., & Palmer, N. (2012). Assessing the effects of removing user fees in Zambia and Niger. Journal Of Health Services Research & Policy, 17(1), 30–36. Scholar
  27. Lagarde, M., & Palmer, N. (2011). The impact of user fees on access to health services in low- and middle-income countries. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 4(4), CD009094. Scholar
  28. Leone, T., Cetorelli, V., Neal, S., & Matthews, Z. (2016). Financial accessibility and user fee reforms for maternal healthcare in five sub-Saharan countries: a quasi-experimental analysis. British Medical Journal Open, 6(1), e009692. Scholar
  29. Matsuoka, S., Aiga, H., Rasmey, L. C., Rathavy, T., & Okitsu, A. (2010). Perceived barriers to utilization of maternal health services in rural Cambodia. Health Policy, 95(2–3), 255–263. Scholar
  30. McKinnon, B., Harper, S., & Kaufman, J. S. (2015a). Who benefits from removing user fees for facility-based delivery services? Evidence on socioeconomic differences from Ghana, Senegal and Sierra Leone. Social Science and Medicine, 135, 117–123. Scholar
  31. McKinnon, B., Harper, S., Kaufman, J. S., & Bergevin, Y. (2015b). Removing user fees for facility-based delivery services: A difference-in-differences evaluation from ten sub-Saharan African countries. Health Policy and Planning, 30(4), 432–441. Scholar
  32. Mcpake, B., Witter, S., Ensor, T., Fustukian, S., Newlands, D., Martineau, T., et al. (2013). Removing financial barriers to access reproductive, maternal and newborn health services: The challenges and policy implications for human resources for health. Human Resources for Health, 11(1), 46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Moucheraud, C., Worku, A., Molla, M., Finlay, J. E., Leaning, J., & Yamin, A. E. (2015). Consequences of maternal mortality on infant and child survival: a 25-year longitudinal analysis in Butajira Ethiopia (1987–2011). Reproductive Health, 12(Supplement 1), 1189. Scholar
  34. Nabyonga, J., Desmet, M., Karamagi, H., Kadama, P. Y., Omaswa, F. G., & Walker, O. (2005). Abolition of cost-sharing is pro-poor: Evidence from Uganda. Health Policy and Planning, 20(2), 100–108. Scholar
  35. Ng’anjo Phiri, S., Kiserud, T., Kvåle, G., Byskov, J., Evjen-Olsen, B., Michelo, C., et al. (2014). Factors associated with health facility childbirth in districts of Kenya, Tanzania and Zambia: A population based survey. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 14(1), 219. Scholar
  36. Nimpagaritse, M., & Bertone, M. P. (2011). The sudden removal of user fees: The perspective of a frontline manager in Burundi. Health Policy and Planning, 26(Supplement 2), ii63-ii71. Scholar
  37. NPC, & ICF. (2014). Nigeria demographic and health survey 2013. Abuja, Rockville: National Population Commission (NPC); ICF International.Google Scholar
  38. Pearson, L., Gandhi, M., Admasu, K., & Keyes, E. B. (2011). User fees and maternity services in Ethiopia. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 115(3), 310–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Ponsar, F., van Herp, M., Zachariah, R., Gerard, S., Philips, M., & Jouquet, G. (2011). Abolishing user fees for children and pregnant women trebled uptake of malaria-related interventions in Kangaba, Mali. Health Policy and Planning, 26(Supplement 2), ii72-ii83. Scholar
  40. Preker, A. S., & Langenbrunner, J. (2005). Spending wisely: Buying health services for the poor. Washington, DC: World Bank.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Ridde, V., Robert, E., & Meessen, B. (2012). A literature review of the disruptive effects of user fee exemption policies on health systems. BMC Public Health, 12(1), 289. Scholar
  42. Say, L., & Raine, R. (2007). A systematic review of inequalities in the use of maternal health care in developing countries: Examining the scale of the problem and the importance of context. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 85(10), 812–819. Scholar
  43. Schneider, H., & Gilson, L. (1999). The impact of free maternal health care in South Africa. In M. Berer & T. Sundari Ravindran (Eds.), Safe motherhood initiatives: critical issues (pp. 93–101). Blackwell: Oxford.Google Scholar
  44. Sharma, S., Smith, S., Sonneveldt, E., Pine, M., & Dayaratna, V. (2005). Formal and Informal Fees for maternal health care services in five countries: Policies practices and perspectives. Washington, DC: USAID.Google Scholar
  45. Singh, S., Darroch, J. E., Ashford, L. S., & Vlassoff, M. (2009). Adding it up: The benefits of investing in family planning and newborn and maternal health. New York: Guttmacher Institute.Google Scholar
  46. WHO. (2015a). State of inequality: Reproductive, maternal, newborn and child health: interactive visualization of health data. Geneva: World Health Organization (WHO).Google Scholar
  47. WHO. (2015b). Trends in maternal mortality: 1990 to 2015: Estimates by WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA, World Bank Group and the United Nations Population Division. World Health Organization (WHO). Accessed October 8, 2018.
  48. Wilkinson, D., Gouws, E., Sach, M., & Karim, S. S. (2001). Effect of removing user fees on attendance for curative and preventive primary health care services in rural South Africa. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 79(7), 665–671.Google Scholar
  49. Witter, S., Armar-Klemesu, M., & Dieng, T. (2008). National fee exemption schemes for deliveries: Comparing the recent experiences of Ghana and Senegal. Studies in Health Services Organisation and Policy series, 24, 167–198.Google Scholar
  50. Witter, S., Dieng, T., Mbengue, D., Moreira, I., & de Brouwere, V. (2010). The national free delivery and caesarean policy in Senegal: Evaluating process and outcomes. Health Policy and Planning, 25(5), 384–392. Scholar
  51. Witter, S., Khalid Mousa, K., Abdel-Rahman, M. E., Hussein Al-Amin, R., & Saed, M. (2013). Removal of user fees for caesareans and under-fives in Northern Sudan: A review of policy implementation and effectiveness. The International Journal of Health Planning and Management, 28(1), e95–e120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Xu, K., Evans, D. B., Kadama, P., Nabyonga, J., Ogwal, P. O., Nabukhonzo, P., et al. (2006). Understanding the impact of eliminating user fees: Utilization and catastrophic health expenditures in Uganda. Social Science and Medicine, 62(4), 866–876. Scholar
  53. Yates, J., Cooper, R., & Holland, J. (2006). Social protection and health: Experiences in Uganda. Development Policy Review, 24(3), 339–356. Scholar
  54. Yates, R. (2009). Universal health care and the removal of user fees. The Lancet, 373(9680), 2078–2081. Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Sociology DepartmentUniversity of Fort HareEast LondonSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations