Implementation of International Human Rights by Japanese Courts
  • Koji TerayaEmail author


Focusing on a specific state may seem to be of limited significance in research on the implementation of human rights treaties because this topic should be a general agenda, in view of the universal character of human rights. However, the case study of Japan, which has the traditions of civil law and common law through its history, provides a number of universalizable suggestions by its sincere response to the difficulties common to other States in realizing international human rights.


  1. Abe K (2001) Kokusai Jinkenhō to Nihon no Kokunai Hōsei [International human rights law and domestic legal system in Japan]. In: Japanese Society of International Law (ed) Jinken [Human rights]. Sansēdō, Tokyo, pp 267–294Google Scholar
  2. Abe K (2006) Kokusai Jinkenhō niokeru Hyōgen no Jiyū [Freedom of speech in international human rights law]. In: Serita K, Munesue T et al (eds) Kokusai Jinken Kihan no Keisei toTenaki (International human rights law making and development). Shinzansha, Tokyo, pp 229–262Google Scholar
  3. Abe K, Imai T et al (2002) Kokusai Jinkenhō (International human rights law), 2nd edn. Nihonhyōronsha, TokyoGoogle Scholar
  4. Ashibe N (1995) Kenpōgaku [Constitutional legal study]. Yūhikaku, TokyoGoogle Scholar
  5. Ashibe N (2002) Kenpō [Constitutional law], 3rd edn. Iwanami shoten, TokyoGoogle Scholar
  6. Aust A (2007) Modern treaty law and practice, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Costa J-P (2014) Dialogue entre cours internationals et nationals. Kokusai Jinken (Human Rights Int) 25:3–12 (in Japanese Translation)Google Scholar
  8. Crawford J (2008) Brownlie’s principles of public international law, 8th edn. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  9. Crawford J (2013) State responsibility: the general part. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dupuy P-M (2012) International law and domestic (municipal) law. In: Wolfrum R (ed) The Max Planck Encyclopedia of public international law, vol V. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 836–862Google Scholar
  11. Economides CP (2010) Content of the obligation. In: Crawford J et al (eds) The law of international responsibility. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 371–381Google Scholar
  12. Ejima A (2013) Yōroppa Jinken Saibansho to Kokunai Saibansho no ‘taiwa’ [‘Dialogue’ between European Court of Human Rights and domestic courts]. In: Sakamoto S, Yakushiji K (eds) Fuhenteki Kokusaishakai heno Hō no Chōsen (Legal challenge to universal international society). Shinzansha, Tokyo, pp 85–119Google Scholar
  13. Fitzmaurice G (1958) The general principles of international law considered from the standpoint of the rule of law. Recueil des Cours 92:1–227Google Scholar
  14. Grimm D (2005) The protective function of the state. In: Nolte G (ed) European and US constitutionalism. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 137–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hakamoto S (2011) Kokunai Hōchitsuzyo niokeru Kokusaihō no Tekiyō [The application of international law in the domestic legal order]. In: Skai H et al (eds) Kokusaihō (International law). Yūhikaku, Tokyo, pp 382–411Google Scholar
  16. Harris DJ (2010) Cases and materials on international law, 7th edn. Sweet & Maxwell, Thomson Reuters, LondonGoogle Scholar
  17. Hirai Y (1992) Saiken Kakuron II, Fuhōkōihō [Claims: particular Part II: Tort law]. Yūhikaku, TokyoGoogle Scholar
  18. ILA – International Law Association, International Human Rights Law Committee (2016) Johannesburg Conference – Report of International Human Rights Law and the International Court of Justice (ICJ): the Domestic Implementation of Judgments/Decisions of Courts and Other International Bodies That Involve International Human Rights Law [ILA Johannesburg Report]. Available at Accessed 11 July 2017
  19. Ipsen K (1990) Völkerrecht: Ein Studienbuch, 3. Aufl. C.H. Beck, MünchenGoogle Scholar
  20. Ito Y (2014) Kokusai Jinkenhoshō wo Meguru Saibankan no Taiwa (Judicial dialogue and European human rights law). Kokusai Jinken (Human Rights Int) 25:34–38Google Scholar
  21. Itoh M (1990) Kokusai Jinkenhō to Saibansho (International human rights law and the courts). Kokusai Jinken (Human Rights Int) 1:7–11Google Scholar
  22. Iwasawa Y (1985) Jōyaku no Kokunaitekiyōkanousei (Domestic applicability of treaties). Yūhikaku, TokyoGoogle Scholar
  23. Iwasawa Y (1997) Nihon niokeru Kokusai Jinken Soshō (International human rights litigation in Japan). In: Sugihara T (ed) Funsō Kaiketsu no Kokusaihō (International law on dispute settlement). Sanseidō, Tokyo, pp 251–272Google Scholar
  24. Iwasawa Y (2006) Nibutani Dam Hanketsu no Kokusaihōzyō no Igi [The significance of the Nibutani Dam Case in international law]. In: Serita K, Munesue T et al (eds) Kokusai Jinken Kihan no Keisei to Tenaki (International human rights law making and development). Shinzansha, Tokyo, pp 363–374Google Scholar
  25. Iwasawa Y (2010) Kokusaihō to Kokunaihō no Kankei [The relationship between international law and domestic law]. In: Kotera A et al (eds) Kōgi Kokusaihō (International law), 2nd edn. Yūhikaku, Tokyo, pp 105–132Google Scholar
  26. Iwasawa Y (2016) Domestic application of international law. Recueil des Cours 378:9–262Google Scholar
  27. Izumi T (2014) Grōbaru Shakai no Naka no Nihon no Saikōsaibansho to Sono Kadai (The roles and issues of the Japanese Supreme Court in the era of globalized society: international dialogue between judges). Kokusai Jinken (Human Rights Int) 25:13–17Google Scholar
  28. Kommers DP, Miller RA (2012) The constitutional jurisprudence of the Federal Republic of Germany, 3rd edn. Duke University Press, DurhamCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Koseki S (1998) The Birth of Japan’s Postwar constitution (trans: Moore RA ed). Westview Press, BoulderGoogle Scholar
  30. Koyama G (1998) Kihonken Hogo no Hōri (Die Lehre von den grundrechtlichen Schutzpflichten). Seibundō, TokyoGoogle Scholar
  31. Laughlin M (2010) What is constitutionalisation? In: Dobner P, Laughlin M (eds) The twilight of constitutionalism? Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 47–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Malanczuk P (1997) Akehurst’s modern introduction to international law, 7th edn. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  33. Matsuda H (2010) Nihon no Saibansho niokeru Kokusai Jinkenhō (International human rights in Japanese courts). Univ Tokyo Law Rev 5:148–168Google Scholar
  34. Matsuda H (2016) Kenpō Chizuzyo niokeru Kokusai Ki’han (1) (The competence of implementing international norms in constitutional legal systems). Kokka Gakkai Zasshi (J Assoc Polit Soc Sci) 129:468–525Google Scholar
  35. Matsumoto K (2011) Kihonken no Shijinkan Kōryoku [Effect of fundamental rights in the private sphere]. Jurist 1424:56–67Google Scholar
  36. Michelman FI (2012) Constitutions and the public/private divide. In: Rosenfeld M, Sajó A (eds) The Oxford handbook of comparative constitutional law. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 298–317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Milhaupt CJ et al (eds) (2012) The Japanese legal system, 2nd edn. Thomson Reuters, Foundation Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  38. Miyazawa T (1955) Nihonkoku Kenpō [The constitution of Japan]. Nihonhyōronshinsha, TokyoGoogle Scholar
  39. Munesue T (2006) Daisansha Kōryokuron no Shin Tenaki [New development in the doctrine of the third party effect]. In: Serita K, Munesue T et al (eds) Kokusai Jinkenhō to Kenpō (International human rights and constitution). Shinzansha, TokyoGoogle Scholar
  40. Oda H (1999) Japanese law, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  41. Oliver D, Fedtke J (eds) (2007) Human rights and the private sphere: a comparative study. Routledge-Cavendish, London and New YorkGoogle Scholar
  42. Onuma Y (1998) Jinken, Kokka Bunmei [Human rights, states, and civilization]. Chikumashobō, TokyoGoogle Scholar
  43. Onuma Y (2009) A transcivilizational perspective on international law. Recueil des Cours 342:77–148Google Scholar
  44. Peters A (2015) Global constitutionalism. In: Gibbons MT (ed) The Encyclopedia of political thought, vol III. John Wiley and Sons, West Sussex, pp 1487–1484Google Scholar
  45. Rousseau C (1958) Principes de droit international public. Recueil des Cours 93:369–549Google Scholar
  46. Rousseau C (1970) Droit international public, Tome I. Sirey, ParisGoogle Scholar
  47. Rousseau C (1984) Droit international public, 10éme éd. Précis Dalloz, ParisGoogle Scholar
  48. Ruggie J (2011) Report of the special representative of the secretary-general on the issue of human rights and transnational corporations and other business enterprises. UN Doc A/HRC/17/31, Human Rights Council, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  49. Saito M (2002) Kokuhō Taikei niokeru Kenpō to Jyōyaku [Constitution and treaty in domestic legal order]. Shinzansha, TokyoGoogle Scholar
  50. Saito T (2014) Shijinkan no Sabetsu Kōi to Jinshusabetsu Teppaijōyaku no Kokunai Tekiyō (Civil case of Racist attacks against a Korean School by Zaitokukai and CERD). Kokusai Jinken (Human rights international) 25:112–115Google Scholar
  51. Sano H (2008) Kokusekihō Iken Hanketsu to Kokuseki Hō no Kadai [The nationality act case and the Agenda of the nationality act]. Jurist 1366:85–91Google Scholar
  52. Sato K (2011) Nihonkoku Kenpō Ron [Theory of the constitution of Japan]. Seibundō, TokyoGoogle Scholar
  53. Serita K, Yakushiji K, Sakamoto S (2008) Kokusai Jinkenhō (International human rights law). Shinzansha, TokyoGoogle Scholar
  54. Shaw MN (2008) International law, 6th edn. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  55. Shelton D (2011) Introduction. In: Shelton D (ed) International law and domestic legal systems: incorporation, transformation, and persuasion. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 1–22Google Scholar
  56. Shin H-B (2011) Kokusai Jinkenhō kara Mita Gaikokujin no Jinken [Foreigners’ human rights from the perspective international human rights law]. Liberty Just 62:11–18Google Scholar
  57. Shishido J (2010) Shijinkan Kōryoku Ron no Genzai to Mirai [The present and the future of doctrines of the effect in the private sphere]. In: Hasebe Y (ed) Jinken no Shatei [The scope of human rights]. Hōritsubunkasha, Kyoto, pp 25–47Google Scholar
  58. Simma B et al (1997) The role of German courts in the enforcement of international human rights. In: Conforti B, Francioni F (eds) Enforcing international human rights in domestic courts. Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, pp 71–109Google Scholar
  59. Sonobe I (2000) Nihon no Saikōsaibansho niokeru Kokusai Jinkenhō no Saikin no Tekiyōzyōkyō (Recent trend of application of international human rights law in the Supreme Court of Japan). Kokusai Jinken (Human Rights Int) 11:2–4Google Scholar
  60. Suami T (2013) Yōroppa niokeru Kenpō Tagenshugi [Constitutional pluralism in Europe]. Hōritsujihō 1065:43–48Google Scholar
  61. Tabata S (1973) Kokusaihō I [International law I], New edn. Yūhikaku, TokyoGoogle Scholar
  62. Teraya K (2009) Rethinking ‘indirect application’: a phase of the ‘application’ of international human rights law in Japan. In: Kokusai Rippō no Saizensen (Current issues of international lawmaking). Yūshindo, Tokyo, pp 165–207Google Scholar
  63. Teraya K (2011) Regulation for non-state actors by international human rights treaties: a case study in Japan. Soochow Law J 8(2):19–39Google Scholar
  64. Teraya K (2012) Shijinkan Kōryokuron to ‘Kokusaihō’ no Shikō Yoshiki (“Horizontal application theories and “international law” thinking”). Kokusai Jinken (Human Rights Int) 23:9–15Google Scholar
  65. Teraya K (2014) Heito Supihchi Jiken [Case on hate speech]. In: Jyuyo Hanrei Kaisetsu [Comentary on important cases]. Jurist 1466:292–293Google Scholar
  66. Teraya K (2015) Chosei Riron Saikō [Rethinking the theory of coordination]. In: Eto J (ed) Kokusai Hógaku no Shosō (Aspects of international law studies: achievements and prospects). Shinzansha, Tokyo, pp 105–149Google Scholar
  67. Teraya K (2016) Impact of the international covenants on human rights on the rights of foreigners in Japan. Jap Yearb Int Law 59Google Scholar
  68. Uchino M (2000) Kokusaihō to Kokunaihō (Tokuni Kenpō) no Kankei ni tsuiteno Tannaru Memogaki (A note on the relation between international law and constitution). Kokusai Jinken (Human Rights Int) 11:5–9Google Scholar
  69. Yakushiji K (2006) Kokusaihōgaku kara Mita Jiyūkenkiyaku no Kokunaijisshi [Domestic implementation of the ICCPR in terms of international legal study]. In: Serita K, Munusue T et al (eds) Kokusai Jinken Kihan to Kenpō (International human rights and constitution). Shinzansha, Tokyo, pp 43–101Google Scholar
  70. Yamamoto H (2011) Kenpo Kaishaku niokeru Kokusaijinken Kihan no Yakuwari (Normes internationales de protection des droits de l’homme et interprétation constitutionnelle). Kokusai Jinken (Human Rights Int) 22:35–40Google Scholar
  71. Yamamoto S (1994), Kokusaihō [International law], New edn. Yūhikaku, TokyoGoogle Scholar
  72. Yokota K (1960) Kokusaihō [International law], Rev edn. Yūhikaku, TokyoGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Graduate Schools for Law and PoliticsUniversity of TokyoTokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations