Advertisement

Germany

Domestic Courts as International Human Rights Courts: A German Perspective
  • Thilo RensmannEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

Long before the rights and freedoms proclaimed in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) became binding as a matter of international law, they were endowed with full normativity and justiciability in German domestic law by virtue of having been internalised in (West-) Germany’s 1949 Constitution. Germany thus became a pilot project for domestic courts exercising their new role as trustees of the observance of international human rights. Under the guardianship of the Federal Constitutional Court (FCC), German courts made a significant contribution to overcoming the legacy of the Nazi dictatorship by firmly entrenching human rights in German law and society. It was, however, not only in this domestic sense that German courts, and in particular the FCC, evolved into international human rights courts. The FCC’s fundamental rights jurisprudence fleshed out important doctrinal aspects of international human rights law and thereby exerted significant influence on the European Court of Human Rights, as well as many constitutional and supreme courts around the world. However, it is only in its more recent jurisprudence that the FCC has started to reflect on and adapt to the increasingly transnational dimension of its role as a human rights court.

References

  1. Alexy R, Rivers J (2009) A theory of constitutional rights. OUP, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  2. Bickel AM (1962) The least dangerous branch. Bobbs-Merrill, IndianapolisGoogle Scholar
  3. Bröhmer J, Hill C, Spitzkatz M, Wahiduddin S (2012) 60 Years German basic law: the German constitution and its court: landmark decisions of the federal constitutional court of Germany in the area of fundamental rights, 2nd edn. Malaysian Current Law Journal, AmpangGoogle Scholar
  4. Carter A (2018) Constitutional convergence? Some lessons from proportionality. In: Elliott M, Varuhas JNE, Wilson Stark S (eds) The Unity of public law? Doctrinal, theoretical and comparative perspectives. Hart, Oxford, pp 373–394Google Scholar
  5. Cassin R (1951) La déclaration universelle et la mise en œuvre des droits de l’homme. Recueil des cours de l'académie de droit international 79 (1951-II):239–367Google Scholar
  6. Collins J (2015) Democracy’s guardian: a history of the German federal constitutional court 1951–2001. OUP, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Forsthoff E (1959) Die Umbildung des Verfassungsgesetzes. In: Forsthoff E (ed) Rechtsstaat im Wandel. C.H. Beck, München, pp 130–152Google Scholar
  8. Glendon MA (2001) A world made new – Eleanor Roosevelt and the universal declaration of human rights. Random House, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  9. Görtemaker M, Saffering C (2016) Die Akte Rosenburg: Das Bundesministerium der Justiz und die NS-Zeit. C.H. Beck, MünchenCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Grimm D (2015) The role of fundamental rights after sixty-five years of constitutional jurisprudence in Germany. Int J Const Law 13:9–29Google Scholar
  11. Hailbronner M (2017) Transformative constitutionalism: not only in the global south. Am J Comp Law 65:527–565CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hailbronner M, Martini S (2017) The federal constitutional court. In: Jakab A, Dyevre A, Itzcovich G (eds) Comparative constitutional reasoning. CUP, Cambridge, pp 356–393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Henkin L (1999) That “S” word: sovereignty, and globalization, and human rights, Et Cetera. Fordham Law Rev 68:1–14Google Scholar
  14. Jerusalem FW (1950) Die Grundrechte des Bonner Grundgesetzes und ihre Durchsetzung in der Rechtsprechung. SJZ, 1–8Google Scholar
  15. Koh HH (1996) Transnational legal process. Neb Law Rev 75:181–208Google Scholar
  16. Kommers DP, Miller RA (2012) The constitutional jurisprudence of the Federal Republic of Germany, 3rd edn. Duke University Press, DurhamCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Laufke F (1956) Vertragsfreiheit und Grundgesetz. In: Nipperdey HC (ed) Das deutsche Privatrecht in der Mitte des Jahrhunderts – Festschrift für Heinrich Lehmann, vol 1E. De Gruyter, Berlin, pp 145–188Google Scholar
  18. Lauterpacht H (1945) An international bill of the rights of man. Columbia University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  19. Lauterpacht H (1950) International law and human rights. Frederick A Praeger Publishers, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  20. Nipperdey HC (1954) Die Würde des Menschen. In: Neumann FL, Nipperdey HC, Scheuner U (eds) Die Grundrechte – Handbuch der Theorie und Praxis der Grundrechte, vol 2E. Duncker & Humblot, Berlin, pp 1–50Google Scholar
  21. Nußberger A (2014) The European Court of Human Rights and the German Federal Constitutional Court. Available via https://www.cak.cz/assets/pro-advokaty/mezinarodni-vztahy/the-echr-and-the-german-constitutional-court_angelika-nussberger.pdf. Accessed 15 May 2018
  22. Petersen N (2017) Proportionality and judicial activism: fundamental rights adjudication in Canada, Germany and South Africa. CUP, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Rensmann T (2006) The constitution as a normative order of values: the influence of international human rights law on the evolution of modern constitutionalism. In: Dupuy P-M, Fassbender B, Shaw MN, Sommermann K-P (eds) Common values in international law – essays in honour of Christian Tomuschat. N P Engel, Kehl am Rhein, pp 259–278Google Scholar
  24. Rensmann T (2007) Wertordnung und Verfassung. Mohr Siebeck, TübingenCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Rensmann T (2011) Munich alumni and the evolution of international human rights law. Eur J Int Law 22:973–991CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Rensmann T (2017) Das “letzte Wort” im Dialog zwischen Karlsruhe und Straßburg. In: Menzel J, Müller-Terpitz R (eds) Verfassungsrechtsprechung, 3rd edn. Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen, pp 725–733Google Scholar
  27. Scelle G (1956) Le phénomène juridique du dédoublement fonctionnel. In: Schätzel W, Schlochauer HJ (eds) Rechtsfragen der Internationalen Organisation – Festschrift für H. Wehberg. Klostermann, Frankfurt am Main, pp 324–342Google Scholar
  28. Schlink B (2012) Proportionality in constitutional law – why everywhere but here? Duke J Comp Int Law 22:291–302Google Scholar
  29. Schmitt C (1927) Verfassungslehre. Duncker & Humblot, Berlin. English edition: Schmitt C (2008) Constitutional theory (trans: Seitzer J). Duke University Press, DurhamGoogle Scholar
  30. Schmitt C (1931) Der Hüter der Verfassung. Mohr, TübingenGoogle Scholar
  31. Sohn LB (1982–1983) The new international law: protection of the rights of individuals rather than states. Am Univ Law Rev 32:1–64Google Scholar
  32. Warren S, Brandeis L (1890) The right to privacy. Harv Law Rev 4:193–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of AugsburgAugsburgGermany

Personalised recommendations