Advertisement

Disseminating Research with Naturally Occurring Data

  • Nikki Kiyimba
  • Jessica Nina Lester
  • Michelle O’Reilly
Chapter

Abstract

In this chapter, we synthesise some of the key debates from the book and give advice on how to disseminate research that uses naturally occurring data. We consider the most common forms of dissemination, such as journal articles, education, and conferences. We also outline some practical ways of maximising the reach of your work. We conclude the chapter by discussing key principles for collecting naturally occurring data and engaging in research that uses it as a central form of evidence.

Keywords

Dissemination Journal articles Conferences Educational study 

References

  1. Birt, L., Scott, S., Cavers, D., Campbell, C., & Walter, F. (2016). Member checking a tool to enhance trustworthiness or merely a nod to validation? Qualitative Health Research. pii: 1049732316654870.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732316654870CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Chorpita, B., & Regan, J. (2009). Dissemination of effective mental health treatment procedures: Maximizing the return on a significant investment. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 47(11), 990–993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cleary, M., & Walter, G. (2004). Apportioning our time and energy: Oral presentation, poster, journal article or other? International Journal of Mental Health Nursing, 13, 204–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Coad, J., & Devitt, P. (2006). Research dissemination: The art of writing an abstract for conferences. Nurse Education in Practice, 6(2), 112–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Corden, A., & Sainsbury, R. (2006). Exploring ‘quality’: Research participants’ perspectives on verbatim quotations. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 9(2), 97–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Craswell, J. (2005). Writing for academic success: A postgraduate guide. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  7. Cunningham, S. (2004). How to …. write a paper. Journal of Orthodontics, 31, 47–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dickson-Swift, V., James, E. L., Kippen, S., & Liamputtong, P. (2007). Doing sensitive research: What challenges do qualitative researchers face. Qualitative Research, 7(3), 327–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dixon-Woods, M., Jackson, C., Windridge, K., & Kenyon, S. (2006). Receiving a summary of the results of a trial: Qualitative study of participants’ views. British Medical Journal, 332, 206–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dixon-Woods, M., Tarrant, C., Jackson, C., Jones, D., & Kenyon, S. (2011). Providing the results of research to participants: A mixed-method study of the benefits and challenges of a consultative approach. Clinical Trials, 8, 330–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Doyle, S. (2007). Member checking with older women: A framework for negotiating meaning. Health Care for Women International, 8(10), 888–908.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fernandez, C. (2007). The return of research results to participants: An ongoing debate modelled in cancer research. Harvard Health Policy Review, 8, 16–28.Google Scholar
  13. Fernandez, C., Gao, J., Strahlendorf, C., Moghrabi, A., Davis Pentz, R., Barfield, R., … Kodish, E. (2009). Providing research results to participants: Attitudes and needs of adolescents and parents of children with cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 27(6), 878–883.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Goldblatt, H., Karnieli-Miller, O., & Neumann, M. (2011). Sharing qualitative research findings with participants: Study experiences of methodological and ethical dilemmas. Patient Education and Counseling, 82, 389–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gordner, C., & Burkett, L. (2012). Writing a poster abstract: Guidelines for success. PENS, 3, 5–6.Google Scholar
  16. Happell, B. (2007). Hitting the target! A no tears approach to writing an abstract for a conference presentation. International Journal of Mental Health Nursing, 16, 477–452.Google Scholar
  17. Heritage, J., & Robinson, J. D. (2011). ‘Some’ versus ‘any’ medical issues: Encouraging patients to reveal their unmet concerns. In C. Antaki (Ed.), Applied conversation analysis: Intervention and change in institutional talk (pp. 15–31). Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Heritage, J., & Robinson, J. D. (2006a). Accounting for the visit: Giving reasons for seeking medical care. In J. Heritage & D. Maynard (Eds.), Communication in medical care: Interactions between primary care physicians and patients (pp. 48–85). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Heritage, J., & Robinson, J. D. (2006b). The structure of patients’ presenting concerns: Physicians’ opening questions. Health Communication, 19(2), 89–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Johnson, R., & Waterfield, J. (2004). Making words count: The value of qualitative research. Physiotherapy Research International, 9(3), 121–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kiyimba, N., & O’Reilly, M. (2018). Reflecting on what ‘you said’ as a way of reintroducing difficult topics in child mental health assessments. Child and Adolescent Mental Health, 23(3), 148–154.  https://doi.org/10.1111/camh.12215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kuper, A., Lingard, L., & Levinson, W. (2008). Critically appraising qualitative research. British Medical Journal, 337, 687–689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lincoln, Y., & Guba, E. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  24. Lowcay, B., & McIntyre, E. (2005). Research posters—The way to display. British Medical Journal, 331(7529), 251–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Markham, M. (2006). Providing research participants with findings from completed cancer-related clinical trials: Not quite as simple as it sounds. Cancer, 106, 1421–1424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Meadows, L., & Morse, J. (2001). Constructing evidence within the qualitative project. In J. Morse, J. Swanson, & A. Kuzel (Eds.), The nature of qualitative evidence (pp. 187–200). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  27. Merriam, S. (2002). Assessing and evaluating qualitative research. In S. Merriam and associates (Ed.), Qualitative research in practice: Examples for discussion and practice (pp. 18–36). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  28. Pope, C., & Mays, N. (1995). Qualitative research: Reaching the parts other methods cannot reach: An introduction to qualitative methods in health and health services research. British Medical Journal, 311(6996), 42–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ranse, J., & Hayes, C. (2009). A novice’s guide to preparing and presenting an oral presentation at a scientific conference. Journal of Emergency Primary Health Care, 7(1), 5 Available from http://ro.ecu.edu.au/jephc/vol7/iss1/5Google Scholar
  30. Stein, A. (2010). Sex, truths, and audiotape: anonymity and the ethics of public exposure in ethnography. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 39(5), 554–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Tong, A., Sainsbury, P., & Craig, J. (2007). Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): A 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 19(6), 349–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Zimmerman, C., Hossain, M., & Watts, C. (2011). Human trafficking and health: A conceptual model to inform policy, intervention and research. Social Science and Medicine, 73(2), 327–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nikki Kiyimba
    • 1
  • Jessica Nina Lester
    • 2
  • Michelle O’Reilly
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Social and Political ScienceUniversity of ChesterChesterUK
  2. 2.School of EducationIndiana UniversityBloomingtonUSA
  3. 3.The Greenwood Institute of Child HealthUniversity of LeicesterLeicesterUK

Personalised recommendations