Advertisement

Necessary yet Insufficient: Contextualizing Trans* Identities in Campus Climate Research

  • finn j. schneider
  • Qui D. Alexander
  • Tania D. Mitchell
Chapter

Abstract

The authors rely upon data from the 2017 Student Experience in the Research University (SERU) survey to address a gap in the campus climate literature by sharing analyses specific to trans* student communities in higher education. Troubling the campus climate framework and the quantitative measures on which it relies, schneider, Alexander, and Mitchell point to campus climate research as necessary yet insufficient to creating meaningful change in higher education institutions to best serve trans*-identified students.

References

  1. American College Health Association. (n.d.). Results from the ACHA-ACHA IIc, Fall 2015 to present. Retrieved from http://www.acha-ncha.org/pubs_rpts.html.
  2. Aultman, B. (2014). Cisgender. Transgender Studies Quarterly, 1(1–2), 61–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Benitez, M. (2010). Resituating cultural centers within a social justice framework. In L. D. Patton (Ed.), Culture centers in higher education: Perspectives on identity, theory, and practice (pp. 119–134). Sterling, VA: Stylus.Google Scholar
  4. Chatman, S. (2011). Factor structure and reliability of the 2011 SERU/UCUES questionnaire core: SERU project technical report. Berkeley, CA: Center for Studies of Higher Education, University of California.Google Scholar
  5. Coulter, R. W. S., & Rankin, S. (2017). College sexual assault and campus climate for sexual- and gender-minority undergraduate students. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, X(x), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260517696870.
  6. Douglass, J. A., Thomson, G., & Zhao, C.-M. (2012). The learning outcomes race: The value of self-reported gains in large research universities. Higher Education, 64, 317–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dugan, J. P., Kusel, M. L, & Simounet, D. L. (2012). Transgender college students: An exploratory study of perceptions, engagement, and educational outcomes. Journal of College Student Development, 53(5), 719–736. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.2012.0067.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Garvey, J. C. (2017). Considerations for queer as a sexual identity classification in education survey research. Journal of College Student Development, 58(7), 1113–1118. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.2017.0088.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Garvey, J. C., & Rankin, S. R. (2015). Making the grade? Classroom climate for LGBTQ students across gender conformity. Journal of Student Affairs Research and Practice, 52(2), 190–203. https://doi.org/10.1080/19496591.2015.1019764.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Harper, S. R., & Hurtado, S. (2011). Nine themes in campus racial climates and implications for institutional transformation. In S. R. Harper & J. F. L. Jackson (Eds.), Introduction to American higher education (pp. 278–291). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  11. Hinds, J. T., Loukas, A., & Perry, C. L. (2017). Sexual and gender minority college students and tobacco use in Texas. Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 00(00), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntx095.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Jourian, T. J. (2015). Evolving nature of sexual orientation and gender identity. New Directions for Student Services, 152, 11–23.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ss.20142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Jourian, T. J., & Simmons, S. L. (2017). Trans* leadership. New Directions for Student Leadership, 154, 59–69. https://doi.org/10.1002/yd.20240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lombardi, E., & Banik, S. (2016). The utility of the two-step gender measure within trans and cis populations. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 13(3), 288–296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-016-0220-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Marine, S. (2011). Stonewall’s legacy: Bisexual, gay, lesbian, and transgender students in higher education. ASHE Higher Education Report, 37(4).Google Scholar
  16. McKinney, J. S. (2005). On the margins: A study of the experiences of transgender college students. Journal of Gay & Lesbian Issues in Education, 3(1), 63–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Nicolazzo, Z. (2016). “Just go in looking good”: The resilience, resistance, and kinship-building of trans* college students. Journal of College Student Development, 57(5), 538–556. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.2016.0057.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Nicolazzo, Z. (2017). Imagining a trans* epistemology: What liberation thinks like in postsecondary education. Urban Education. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085917697203.
  19. Patterson, J. G., Jabson, J. M., & Bowen, D. J. (2017). Measuring sexual and gender minority populations in health surveillance. LGBT Health, 4(2), 82–105. https://doi.org/10.1089/lgbt.2016.0026.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Pryor, J. T. (2015). Out in the classroom: Transgender student experiences at a large public university. Journal of College Student Development, 56(5), 440–455. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.2015.0044.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Rankin, S. R. (2005). Campus climates for sexual minorities. New Directions for Student Services, 111, 17–23. https://doi.org/10.1002/ss.170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Rankin, S., & Garvey, J. C. (2015). Identifying, quantifying, and operationalizing queer-spectrum and trans-spectrum students: Assessment and research in student affairs. New Directions for Student Services, 152, 73–84. https://doi.org/10.1002/ss.20146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Rankin, S., & Reason, R. D. (2008). Transformational tapestry model: A comprehensive approach to transforming campus climate. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 1, 262–274. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Rankin, S. R., Weber, G., Blumenfeld, W., & Frazer, S. (2010). 2010 state of higher education for lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender people. Charlotte, NC: Campus Pride.Google Scholar
  25. Reisner, S. L., Conron, K. J., Anatale Tardiff, L., Jarvi, S., Allegra, G. R., & Bryn Austin, S. (2014). Monitoring the health of transgender and other gender minority populations: Validity of natal sex and gender identity survey items in a U.S. national cohort of young adults. BMC Public Health, 14, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-14-1224.
  26. Renn, K. A. (2010). LGBT and queer research in higher education: The state and status of the field. Educational Researcher, 39(2), 132–141. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189x10362579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Soria, K. M. (2012). Creating a successful transition for working-class first-year students. The Journal of College Orientation and Transition, 20(1), 44–55.Google Scholar
  28. Soria, K. M. (2013). Factors predicting the importance of libraries and research activities for undergraduates. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 40(1), 84–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. The GenIUSS Group. (2014). Best practices for asking questions to identify transgender and other gender minority respondents on population-based surveys. Los Angeles, CA: The Williams Institute.Google Scholar
  30. University of Minnesota. (n.d.a). SERU 2014 base survey—Minnesota. Retrieved from https://seru.umn.edu/sites/seru.umn.edu/files/2014_seru_survey.pdf.
  31. University of Minnesota. (n.d.b). SERU 2015 base survey—Minnesota. Retrieved from https://seru.umn.edu/sites/seru.umn.edu/files/2015_seru_survey.pdf.
  32. University of Minnesota. (n.d.c.). SERU 2017 base survey—Minnesota. Retrieved from http://seru.umn.edu/sites/seru.umn.edu/files/2017_seru_survey.pdf.
  33. University of Minnesota. (2018). Undergraduate SERU: About. Retrieved from https://seru.umn.edu/undergraduate-seru/about.
  34. Vaccaro, A. (2012). Campus microclimates for LGBT faculty, staff, and students: An exploration of the intersections of social identity and campus roles. Journal of Student Affairs Research and Practice, 49(4), 429–446. https://doi.org/10.1515/jsarp-2012-6473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • finn j. schneider
    • 1
  • Qui D. Alexander
    • 2
  • Tania D. Mitchell
    • 1
  1. 1.University of MinnesotaMinneapolisUSA
  2. 2.University of MinnesotaMinneapolisUSA

Personalised recommendations