Advertisement

Introduction: The Quest for Value

  • Jan Heiberg Johansen
Chapter

Abstract

More and more researchers and managers take an interest in organizational paradoxes, where we need to handle elements that are at once interdependent and contradictory.

Researchers claim that there is a close relationship between our responses to the paradoxes and the value we create for ourselves and others. This book is a quest for this value. It is based on the international research on organizational paradoxes, which is expanding in current years and now counts around 700 sources. The introduction frames the issue of organizational paradoxes.

Keywords

Value creation Paradox management as a buzzword Overview of the paradox literature Vaccinating against over-simplyfying organizational theory 

Bibliography

  1. Andersen, M. F. (2016, 25. november). Arbejdsrelateret stress løses ikke med flere buzzwords. Information. Retrieved from http://www.information.dk
  2. Andriopoulos, C., & Lewis, M. W. (2009). Exploitation-Exploration Tensions and Organizational Ambidexterity: Managing Paradoxes of Innovation. Organization Science, 20(4), 696–717.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ashby, W. R. (1956). An Introduction to Cybernetics. New York, NY: John Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ashforth, B. E., Rogers, K. M., Pratt, M. G., & Pradies, C. (2014). Ambivalence in Organizations: A Multilevel Approach. Organization Science, 25(5), 1453–1478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barnes, L. B. (1981). Managing the Paradox of Organizational Trust. Harvard Business Review, 59(2), 107–116.Google Scholar
  6. Bengtsson, M., & Raza-Ullah, T. (2017). Paradox at an Inter-Firm Level: A Coopetition Lens. In W. K. Smith, M. W. Lewis, P. Jarzabkowski, & A. Langley (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Organizational Paradox. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Carlo, J. L., Lyytinen, K., & Boland, R. J. (2012). Dialectics of Collective Minding: Contradictory Appropriations of Information Technology in a High-Risk Project. MIS Quarterly, 36(4), 1081–1108.Google Scholar
  8. Collins, J. (2001). Good to Great. New York: Random House Books.Google Scholar
  9. Dameron, S., & Torset, C. (2014). The Discursive Construction of Strategists’ Subjectivities: Towards a Paradox Lens on Strategy. Journal of Management Studies, 51(2), 291–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Das, T. K., & Teng, B. S. (2000). Instabilities of Strategic Alliances: An Internal Tensions Perspective. Organization Science, 11(1), 77–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Denis, J. L., Lamothe, L., & Langley, A. (2001). The Dynamics of Collective Leadership and Strategic Change in Pluralistic Organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 44(4), 809–837.Google Scholar
  12. Denison, D., Hooijberg, R., & Quinn, R. E. (1995). Paradox and Performance: Toward a Theory of Behavioral Complexity in Managerial Leadership. Organizational Science, 6(5), 524–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Drummond, H. (2008). The Icarus Paradox: An Analysis of a Totally Destructive System. Journal of Information Technology, 23(3), 176–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fairhurst, G. T., Smith, W. K., Banghart, S. G., Lewis, M. W., Putnam, L. L., Raisch, S., & Schad, J. (2016). Diverging and Converging: Integrative Insights on a Paradox Meta-Perspective. The Academy of Management Annals, 10(1), 173–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Feldthus, H. (2017, 2. februar 2017). Paradoksledelse er den direkte vej til helvede. DJØF Bladet.Google Scholar
  16. Ford, J. (2006). Discourses of Leadership: Gender, Identity and Contradiction in a UK Public Sector Organization. Leadership, 2(1), 77–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hart, S. L., & Quinn, R. E. (1993). Roles Executives Play: CEOs, Behavioral Complexity, and Firm Performance. Human Relations, 46(5), 543–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Heiberg Johansen, J. (2015). Frontline Paradox Tactics. MBA dissertation, Henley Business School – University of Reading.Google Scholar
  19. Huxham, C., & Beech, N. (2003). Contrary Prescriptions: Recognizing Good Practice Tensions in Management. Organization Studies, 24(1), 69–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jackson, W. A. (1999). Dualism, Duality and the Complexity of Economic Institutions. International Journal of Social Economics, 26(4), 545–558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jarzabkowski, P., Le, J. K., & Van de Ven, A. H. (2013). Responding to Competing Strategic Demands: How Organizing, Belonging, and Performing Paradoxes Coevolve. Strategic Organization, 11(3), 245–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jarzabkowski, P. A., & Le, J. K. (2016). We Have to Do This and That? You Must Be Joking: Constructing and Responding to Paradox Through Humor. Organization Studies, 38, 433–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Jay, J. (2013). Navigating Paradox as a Mechanism of Change and Innovation in Hybrid Organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 56(1), 137–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Klang, D., Wallnoefer, M., & Hacklin, F. (2014). The Business Model Paradox: A Systematic Review and Exploration of Antecedents. International Journal of Management Reviews, 16(4), 454–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Klarner, P., & Raisch, S. (2013). Move to the Beat–Rhythms of Change and Firm Performance. Academy of Management Journal, 56(1), 160–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kodama, M. (2003). Strategic Innovation in Traditional Big Business: Case Studies of Two Japanese Companies. Organization Studies, 24(2), 235–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kreiner, G. E., Hollensbe, E. C., & Sheep, M. L. (2006). Where Is the “Me” among the “We”? Identity Work and the Search for Optimal Balance. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 1031–1057.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lado, A. A., Dant, R. R., & Tekleab, A. G. (2008). Trust-Opportunism Paradox, Relationalism, and Performance in Interfirm Relationships: Evidence from the Retail Industry. Strategic Management Journal, 29(4), 401–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lewicki, R. J., McAllister, D. J., & Bies, R. (1998). Trust and Distrust: New Relationships and Realities. Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 438–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Miron-Spektor, E., Gino, F., & Argote, L. (2011). Paradoxical Frames and Creative Sparks: Enhancing Individual Creativity through Conflict and Integration. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 116(2), 229–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Parmar, B. L., Freeman, R. E., Harrison, J. S., Wicks, A. C., Purnell, L., & de Colle, S. (2010). Stakeholder Theory: The State of the Art. The Academy of Management Annals, 4(1), 403–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Pierce, J. R., & Aguinis, H. (2013). The Too-Much-of-a-Good-Thing Effect in Management. Journal of Management, 39(2), 313–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Poole, M. S., & Van de Ven, A. H. (1989). Using Paradox to Build Management and Organization Theories. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 562–578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Putnam, L. L., Fairhurst, G. T., & Banghart, S. (2016). Contradictions, Dialectics, and Paradoxes in Organizations: A Constitutive Approach. The Academy of Management Annals, 10(1), 65–171.Google Scholar
  35. Raza-Ullah, T., Bengtsson, M., & Kock, S. (2014). The Coopetition Paradox and Tension in Coopetition at Multiple Levels. Industrial Marketing Management, 43(2), 189–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Robey, D., & Holmstrom, J. (2001). Transforming Municipal Governance in Global Context: A Case Study of the Dialectics of Social Change. Journal of Global Information Technology Management, 4(4), 19–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Schad, J., Lewis, M. W., Raisch, S., & Smith, W. K. (2016). Paradox Research in Management Science: Looking Back to Move Forward. The Academy of Management Annals, 10(1), 5–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Schmitt, A., & Raisch, S. (2013). Corporate Turnarounds: The Duality of Retrenchment and Recovery. Journal of Management Studies, 50, 1216–1244.Google Scholar
  39. Sheep, M. L., Fairhurst, G. T., & Khazanchi, S. (2016). Knots in the Discourse of Innovation: Investigating Multiple Tensions in a Reacquired Spin-Off. Organization Studies, 38, 463–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Smith, W. K., & Lewis, M. W. (2011). Toward a Theory of Paradox: A Dynamic Equilibrium Model of Organizing. Academy of Management Review, 36(2), 381–403.Google Scholar
  41. Tovstiga, G. (2013). Strategy in Practice: A Practitioner’s Guide to Strategic Thinking. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  42. van Bommel, K., & Spicer, A. (2017). Critical Management Studies and Paradox. In W. K. Smith, M. W. Lewis, P. Jarzabkowski, & A. Langley (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Organizational Paradox (p. 17). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Velu, C., & Stiles, P. (2013). Managing Decision-Making and Cannibalization for Parallel Business Models. Long Range Planning, 46(6), 443–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Wasson, C. (2004). The Paradoxical Language of Enterprise. Critical Discourse Studies, 1(2), 175–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Wendt, R. F. (1998). The Sound of One Hand Clapping: Counterintuitive Lessons Extracted from Paradoxes and Double Binds in Participative Organizations. Management Communication Quarterly, 11(3), 323–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Wright, R. P., Paroutis, S. E., & Blettner, D. P. (2013). How Useful Are the Strategic Tools We Teach in Business Schools? Journal of Management Studies, 50(1), 92–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jan Heiberg Johansen
    • 1
  1. 1.Independent ScholarCopenhagenDenmark

Personalised recommendations