Green Nanotechnology for Biofuel Production

  • Susana Rodríguez-CoutoEmail author
Part of the Biofuel and Biorefinery Technologies book series (BBT, volume 7)


The current usage of fossil fuel is not sustainable and, in addition to this, has well-known negative impacts for the environment such as the greenhouse effect and the depletion of the ozone layer. Therefore, the search for alternative energy sources to meet the ever-increasing world’s energy demand is a top priority, especially in the most industrialized countries. In this sense, lignocellulosic biomass, not competing with food production and being available at very low or null cost, is an attractive and economic alternative source for the production of biofuels. Additionally, the new emerging nanotechnologies are increasingly being applied to convert biomass into biofuels. In this chapter, the application of the new emerging green nanotechnologies to biofuel production is pointed out.


Biocatalyst Biofuels Lignocellulosic biomass Nanotechnology Renewable energy 


  1. Alvarez PJJ (2006) Nanotechnology in the environment-the good, the bad and the ugly. ASCE J Environ Eng 132:1233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andrijanto E (2009) Novel bifunctional mesoporous silica nanomaterial catalyst for biodiesel production. Poster of University of Huddersfield Research FestivalGoogle Scholar
  3. Antunes FAF, Gaikwad S, Ingle AP, Pandit R, dos Santos JC, Rai M, da Silva SS (2017) Bioenergy and biofuels: nanotechnological solutions for sustainable production. In: Rai M, da Silva SS (eds) Nanotechnolgy for bioenergy and biofuel production. Springer, Switzerland, pp 3–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bacik JP, Mekasha S, Forsberg Z, Kovalevsky AY, Vaaje-Kolstad G, Eijsink VGH, Nix JC, Coates L, Cuneo MJ, Unkefer CJ, Chen JCH (2017) Neutron and atomic resolution X-ray structures of a lytic polysaccharide monooxygenase reveal copper-mediated dioxygen binding and evidence for N-terminal deprotonation. Biochemistry 56:2529–2532CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baskar G, Kumar RN, Melvin XH, Aiswarya R, Soumya S (2016) Sesbania aculeate biomass hydrolysis using magnetic nanobiocomposite of cellulase for bioethanol production. Renew Energ 98:23–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cherian E, Dharmendirakumar M, Baskar G (2015) Immobilization of cellulase onto MnO2 nanoparticles for bioethanol production by enhanced hydrolysis of agricultural waste. Chin J Catal 36:1223–1229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dahl JA, Maddux BLS, Hutchison JE (2007) Toward greener nanosynthesis. Chem Rev 107:2228–2269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Demirbas A (2008) Biofuels sources, biofuel policy, biofuel economy and global biofuel projections. Energ Convers Manag 49:2106–2116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Duraiarasan S, Razack SA, Manickam A, Munusamy A, Syed MB, Ali MY, Ahmed GM, Mohiuddin MdS (2016) Direct conversion of lipids from marine microalga C. salina to biodiesel with immobilised enzymes using magnetic nanoparticle. J Environ Chem Eng 4:1393–1398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Eggert H, Greaker M (2014) Promoting second generation biofuels: does the first generation pave the road? Energies 7:4430–4445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gilbertson LM, Zimmerman JB, Plata DL, Hutchison JE, Anastas PT (2015) Designing nanomaterials to maximize performance and minimize undesirable implications guided by the principles of green chemistry. Chem Soc Rev 44:5758–5777CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Guo F, Fang Z, Xu CC, Smith RL Jr (2012) Solid acid mediated hydrolysis of biomass for producing biofuels. Prog Energ Combust Sci 38:672–690CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gupta MN, Kaloti M, Kapoor M, Solanki K (2011) Nanomaterials as matrices for enzyme immobilization. Artif Cells Blood Substit Immobil Biotechnol 39:98–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gupta IR, Anderson AJ, Rai M (2015) Toxicity of fungal-generated silver nanoparticles to soil inhabiting Pseudomonas putida KT2440, a rhizospheric bacterium responsible for plant protection and bioremediation. J Hazard Mater 286:48–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Huang L, Luo F, Chen Z, Megharaj M, Naidu R (2015) Green synthesized conditions impacting on the reactivity of Fe NPs for the degradation of malachite green. Spectrochim Acta A 137:154–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hutchison JE (2016) The road to sustainable nanotechnology: challenges, progress and opportunities. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 4:5907–5914CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. IEA (2008) Energy technology perspectives 2008: scenarios and strategies to 2050. OECD/IEA, FranceGoogle Scholar
  18. IEA (2009) World energy outlook 2009. OECD/IEA, FranceGoogle Scholar
  19. Joshi G, Pandey JK, Rana S, Rawat DS (2017) Challenges and opportunities for the application of biofuel. Renew Sust Energ Rev 79:850–866CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kim J, Yoo G, Lee H, Lim J, Kim K, Kim CW, Park MS, Yang JW (2013) Methods of downstream processing for the production of biodiesel from microalgae. Biotechnol Adv 31:862–876CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kuhad RC, Singh A (1993) Lignocellulose biotechnology: current and future prospects. Crit Rev Biotechnol 13:151–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lee HV, Juan JC (2017) Nanocatalysis for the conversion of nonedible biomass to biogasoline via deoxygenation reaction. In: Rai M, da Silva SS (eds) Nanotechnolgy for bioenergy and biofuel production. Springer, Switzerland, pp 301–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lee YC, Lee K, Oh YK (2015) Recent nanoparticle engineering advances in microalgal cultivation and harvesting processes of biodiesel production: a review. Bioresour Technol 184:63–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lin V (2009a) Nanofarming technology extracts biofuel oil without harming algae. News released from Office of Public AffairsGoogle Scholar
  25. Lin V (2009b) Nanoparticle technology for biorefinery of non-food source feedstocks.
  26. Lu F (2009) Developing innovative photobioreactor and extraction technology for production of biodiesel feedstock using microalgae.
  27. Lupoi JS, Smith EA (2011) Evaluation of nanoparticle-immobilized cellulase for improved ethanol yield in simultaneous saccharification and fermentation reactions. Biotechnol Bioeng 108:2835–2843CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mahmood T, Hussain ST (2010) Nanobiotechnology for the production of biofuels from spent tea. Afr J Biotechnol 9:858–886CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Manochio C, Andrade BR, Rodriguez RP, Moraes BS (2017) Ethanol from biomass: a comparative overview. Renew Sustain Energ Rev 80:743–755CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Masran R, Zanirun Z, Bahrin EKB, Ibrahim MF, Yee PL, Abd-Aziz S (2016) Harnessing the potential of ligninolytic enzymes for lignocellulosic biomass pretreatment. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 100:5231–5246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Maynard AD, Aitken RJ, Butz T, Colvin V, Donaldson K, Oberdorster G, Philbert MA, Ryan J, Seaton A, Stone V, Tinkle SS, Tran L, Walker NJ, Warheit DB (2006) Safe handling of nanotechnology. Nature 444:267–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Morose G (2010) The 5 principles of design for safer nanotechnology. J Cleaner Prod 18:285–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Nahr FK, Mokarram RR, Hejazi MA, Ghanbarzadeh BK, Mahmoud S, Benis KZ (2015) Optimization of the nanocellulose based cryoprotective medium toenhance the viability of freeze dried Lactobacillus plantarum using responsesurface methodology. LWT Food Sci Technol 64:326–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Naik SN, Goud VV, Rout PK, Dalai AK (2010) Production of first and second generation biofuels: a comprehensive review. Renew Sustain Energ Rev 14:578–597CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Patumsawad S (2011) 2nd generation biofuels: technical challenge and R and D opportunity in Thailand. J Sustain Energ Environ (Special Issue):47–50Google Scholar
  36. Rashid N, Rehman MSU, Sadiq M, Mahmood T, Han JI (2014) Current status, issues and developments in microalgae derived biodiesel production. Renew Sustain Energ Rev 40:760–778CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Rutz D, Janssen R (2007) Biofuel technology handbook, pp 106–129Google Scholar
  38. Saini JK, Saini R, Tewari L (2014) Lignocellulosic agriculture wastes as biomass feedstocks for second-generation bioethanol production: concepts and recent developments. 3 Biotech 4:337–353Google Scholar
  39. Serrano E, Rus G, Garcia-Martinez J (2009) Nanotechnology for sustainable energy. Renew Sustain Energ Rev 13:2373–2384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Singh SB, Tandon PK (2014) Catalysis: a brief review on nano-catalyst. J Energy Chem Eng 2:106–115Google Scholar
  41. Statista, The statistic portal (2016) The world’s biggest biodiesel producers in 2014, by country (in billion liters),
  42. World Energy Resources (2013) Survey. World Energy Council, LondonGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Ceit-IK4San SebastianSpain
  2. 2.Universidad de Navarra, TecnunSan SebastianSpain
  3. 3.KERBASQUE, Basque Foundation for ScienceBilbaoSpain

Personalised recommendations