Abstract
This chapter serves as the introduction to the edited volume ‘Designing for the User Experience in Learning Systems’. It sets out to frame design for learning, including the description of some design principles for learning systems, and then proceeds to set the goals of the volume, indicate some prior work in this area, and summarise the contributions of the chapters in terms of addressing the goals.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Knowledge and Content are used interchangeably in most depictions of the Triangle, and also here. The aim is to point that, in this context, Content should not be understood as a static piece of text in a book as in previous times, but could be an interactive activity on a tablet, a project in a laboratory, or an assessment. It is in this way that the more generic term Knowledge can be used instead.
References
Baylor AL, Kim Y (2004) Pedagogical agent design: the impact of agent realism, gender, ethnicity, and instructional role. In: Lester JC, Vicari RM, Paraguacu F (eds) Intelligent tutoring systems. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 592–603
Bias RG, Mayhew DJ (2005) Cost-justifying usability: an update for the internet age. Morgan Kaufmann, Amsterdam
Bishop J, Verleger MA (2013) The flipped classroom: a survey of the research. In: ASEE national conference proceedings. American Society for Engineering Education
Byrne DE (1971) The attraction paradigm. Academic Press, New York
Cockburn A (2000) Writing effective use cases, 1st edn. Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co. Inc., Boston, MA, USA
Daniel J (2012) Making sense of MOOCs: Musings in a Maze of Myth, Paradox and possibility. Ubiquity Press. https://jime.open.ac.uk/articles/10.5334/2012-18/. Accessed on 31 May 2018
Duran D (2017) Learning-by-teaching. Evidence and implications as a pedagogical mechanism. Innov Educ Teach Int 54(5):476–484. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2016.1156011
Fischer G, Nakakoji K, Ostwald J, Stahl G, Sumner T (1993) Embedding critics in design environments. Knowl Eng Rev 8(4):285–307. https://doi.org/10.1017/S026988890000031X
Freeman A, Adams Becker S, Cummins M, Davis A, Hall Giesinger C (2017) NMC/CoSN Horizon report: 2017 K-12 Edition. The New Media Consortium. https://www.nmc.org/publication/nmccosn-horizon-report-2017-k-12-edition/. Accessed on 31 May 2018
Garon-Carrier G, Boivin M, Guay F, Kovas Y, Dionne G, Lemelin J-P, Tremblay RE (2016) Intrinsic motivation and achievement in mathematics in elementary school: a longitudinal investigation of their association. Child Dev 87(1):165–175. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/cdev.12458. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12458
Global survey on the quality of MOOCs (n.d.). http://www.survey.MOOC-Quality.eu/. Accessed on 31 May 2018
Griffin P, Care E (2015) Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills: methods and approach. Springer, Dordrecht
Hoekstra H, Sluijs Ev (2003) Managing competencies: implementing human resource management. GITP
Honey M, Pearson G, Schweingruber H (2014) STEM integration in K-12 education: status, prospects, and an agenda for research. National Academies Press, Washington, District of Columbia
Hourcade J (2015) Child-computer interaction. University of Iowa, Iowa City
Inclusive Design Research Center. (n.d.). What is inclusive design. https://idrc.ocadu.ca/about-the-idrc/49-resources/online-resources/articlesand-papers/443-whatisinclusivedesign. Accessed on 31 May 2018
ISO (2010) ISO 9241–210:2010: Ergonomics of human system interaction–Part 210: Human-centred design for interactive systems (Standard). International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, CH
Kapros E (2016) The role of empathy in designing for education. Learnovate, Trinity College Dublin. http://www.learnovatecentre.org/empathy-in-designing-for-education/. Accessed on 31 May 2018
Kearney M, Schuck S, Burden K, Aubusson P (2012) Viewing mobile learning from a pedagogical perspective. Res Learn Technol 20(0). https://journal.alt.ac.uk/index.php/rlt/article/view/1225. https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v20i0.14406
Kim Y, Park N (2012) The effect of steam education on elementary school student’s creativity improvement. In: T-h Kim et al (eds) Computer applications for security, control and system engineering. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 115–121
Mach N (2009) Gaming, learning 2.0, and the digital divide. In: Siemens G, Fulford C (eds) Proceedings of edmedia: world conference on educational media and technology 2009. Honolulu, HI, USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), pp 2972–2977. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/31901
Margaryan A, Bianco M, Littlejohn A (2015) Instructional quality of massive open online courses (MOOCs). Comput Educ 80(C):77–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.08.005
McConney A, Oliver MC, Woods-McConney A, Schibeci R, Maor D (2014) Inquiry, engagement, and literacy in science: a retrospective, crossnational analysis using PISA 2006. Sci Educ 98(6):963–980. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/sce.21135. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21135
Nielsen J (1994) Usability inspection methods. In: Conference companion on human factors in computing systems. ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp 413–414. https://doi.org/10.1145/259963.260531
Nielsen J (1995) Heuristic evaluation: how-to. https://www.nngroup.com/articles/how-to-conduct-a-heuristic-evaluation/. Accessed on 31 May 2018
OECD (2011) The protection of children online (No. 179). https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/content/paper/5kgcjf71pl28-en. https://doi.org/10.1787/5kgcjf71pl28-en
Parmaxi A, Zaphiris P (2017) Web 2.0 in computer-assisted language learning: a research synthesis and implications for instructional design and educational practice. Interact Learn Environ 25(6):704–716. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2016.1172243
Peirce N, Conlan O, Wade V (2008) Adaptive educational games: providing non-invasive personalised learning experiences. In: 2008 second IEEE international conference on digital game and intelligent toy enhanced learning, pp 28–35. https://doi.org/10.1109/DIGITEL.2008.30
Pellas N, Kazanidis I, Konstantinou N, Georgiou G (2017) Exploring the educational potential of three-dimensional multi-user virtual worlds for stem education: a mixed-method systematic literature review. Educ Inf Technol 22(5):2235–2279. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-016-9537-2
Prensky M (2003) Digital game-based learning. Comput Entertain 1(1):21–21. https://doi.org/10.1145/950566.950596
Quigley CF, Herro D, Jamil FM (2017) Developing a conceptual model of STEAM teaching practices. School Sci Math 117(1–2):1–12. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/ssm.12201. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12201
Quinn C (2000) mLearning: mobile, wireless, in-your-pocket learning. http://www.linezine.com/2.1/features/cqmmwiyp.htm. Accessed on 31 May 2018
Reeves D (2010) A framework for assessing 21st century skills. In: 21st century skills: rethinking how students learn. Solution Tree Press, pp 305–325
Ridgeway CL, Smith-Lovin L (1999) The gender system and interaction. Ann Rev Sociol 25(1):191–216. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.25.1.191
Ryan RM, Deci EL (2002) Overview of self-determination theory: an organismic dialectical perspective. In: Handbook of self-determination research. University of Rochester Press, pp 3–33
Sanchez-Gordon S, Lujn-Mora S (2017) Technological innovations in large-scale teaching: five roots of massive open online courses. J Educ Comput Res. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633117727597
Seale JK (2014) E-learning and disability in higher education accessibility research and practice. Routledge, London
Stahl G, Koschmann T, Suthers D (2006) Computer-supported collaborative learning: an historical perspective. In: Sawyer RK (ed) Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences. Cambridge University Press, pp 409–426. http://www.cis.drexel.edu/faculty/gerry/cscl/CSCL_English.pdf
Stracke CM (2017) The quality of MOOCs: how to improve the design of open education and online courses for learners? In: Zaphiris P, Ioannou A (eds) Learning and collaboration technologies. Springer International Publishing, Cham, Novel learning ecosystems, pp 285–293
Traxler J (2010) Distance education and mobile learning: catching up, taking stock. Distance Educ 31(2):129–138. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2010.503362
Voogt J, Roblin NP (2012) A comparative analysis of international frameworks for 21st century competences: implications for national curriculum policies. J Curric Stud 44(3):299–321. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2012.668938
Zyngier D (2008) (Re)conceptualising student engagement: doing education not doing time. Teach Teach Educ 24(7):1765–1776. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0742051X07001102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2007.09.004
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kapros, E., Koutsombogera, M. (2018). Introduction: User Experience in and for Learning. In: Kapros, E., Koutsombogera, M. (eds) Designing for the User Experience in Learning Systems. Human–Computer Interaction Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94794-5_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94794-5_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-94793-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-94794-5
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)